RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    Overview of the Process of Conducting Meta-analyses of the Diagnostic Test Accuracy = Overview of the Process of Conducting Meta-analyses of the Diagnostic Test Accuracy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104300404

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Diagnosis is a critical step for clinical treatment. Many individual studies have been conducted to determine the accuracy of various diagnostic tests, but they had small sample sizes and correspondingly inadequate statistical strength. Combining the results from several such studies can help increase the statistical strength and precision of their results. Meta-analysis is a useful tool for evaluating the accuracy of diagnostic tests and can be used to obtain precise estimates when multiple small studies for a given test and subject pool are available. The need for meta-analysis on studies examining diagnostic test accuracy has increased noticeably, and more meta-analyses on diagnostic test accuracy studies are being published. A meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies differs from a typical meta-analysis because diagnostic test accuracy studies report a pair of statistics, such as sensitivity and specificity, rather than a single statistic. Therefore, meta-analyses of the diagnostic test accuracy need to deal with two summary statistics simultaneously. More complex statistical methods are required for conducting meta-analyses using diagnostic test accuracy studies compared to that required for conventional meta-analysis. This is because the sensitivity and specificity are generally inversely correlated due to a threshold effect, and there is considerable heterogeneity in the results of test accuracy studies. This review provides an overview of the process of meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy. (J Rheum Dis 2018;25:3-10)
    번역하기

    Diagnosis is a critical step for clinical treatment. Many individual studies have been conducted to determine the accuracy of various diagnostic tests, but they had small sample sizes and correspondingly inadequate statistical strength. Combining the ...

    Diagnosis is a critical step for clinical treatment. Many individual studies have been conducted to determine the accuracy of various diagnostic tests, but they had small sample sizes and correspondingly inadequate statistical strength. Combining the results from several such studies can help increase the statistical strength and precision of their results. Meta-analysis is a useful tool for evaluating the accuracy of diagnostic tests and can be used to obtain precise estimates when multiple small studies for a given test and subject pool are available. The need for meta-analysis on studies examining diagnostic test accuracy has increased noticeably, and more meta-analyses on diagnostic test accuracy studies are being published. A meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies differs from a typical meta-analysis because diagnostic test accuracy studies report a pair of statistics, such as sensitivity and specificity, rather than a single statistic. Therefore, meta-analyses of the diagnostic test accuracy need to deal with two summary statistics simultaneously. More complex statistical methods are required for conducting meta-analyses using diagnostic test accuracy studies compared to that required for conventional meta-analysis. This is because the sensitivity and specificity are generally inversely correlated due to a threshold effect, and there is considerable heterogeneity in the results of test accuracy studies. This review provides an overview of the process of meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy. (J Rheum Dis 2018;25:3-10)

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Gotzsche PC, "Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis. It may be crucially important for patients" 321 : 585-586, 2000

    2 Pattamapaspong N, "Value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gout in patients presenting with acute arthritis" 46 : 759-767, 2017

    3 Naredo E, "Ultrasound-detected musculoskeletal urate crystal deposition: which joints and what findings should be assessed for diagnosing gout?" 73 : 1522-1528, 2014

    4 Terslev L, "Ultrasound as an outcome measure in gout. A validation process by the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group" 42 : 2177-2181, 2015

    5 Ottaviani S, "Ultrasonography in gout: a case-control study" 30 : 499-504, 2012

    6 Hanley JA, "The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve" 143 : 29-36, 1982

    7 Campbell JM, "The joanna briggs institute reviewers' manual 2015. The systematic review of studies of diagnostic test accuracy" 46-, 2015

    8 Glas AS, "The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance" 56 : 1129-1135, 2003

    9 Leeflang MM, "Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy" 149 : 889-897, 2008

    10 Deeks JJ, "Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests" 323 : 157-162, 2001

    1 Gotzsche PC, "Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis. It may be crucially important for patients" 321 : 585-586, 2000

    2 Pattamapaspong N, "Value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gout in patients presenting with acute arthritis" 46 : 759-767, 2017

    3 Naredo E, "Ultrasound-detected musculoskeletal urate crystal deposition: which joints and what findings should be assessed for diagnosing gout?" 73 : 1522-1528, 2014

    4 Terslev L, "Ultrasound as an outcome measure in gout. A validation process by the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group" 42 : 2177-2181, 2015

    5 Ottaviani S, "Ultrasonography in gout: a case-control study" 30 : 499-504, 2012

    6 Hanley JA, "The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve" 143 : 29-36, 1982

    7 Campbell JM, "The joanna briggs institute reviewers' manual 2015. The systematic review of studies of diagnostic test accuracy" 46-, 2015

    8 Glas AS, "The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance" 56 : 1129-1135, 2003

    9 Leeflang MM, "Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy" 149 : 889-897, 2008

    10 Deeks JJ, "Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests" 323 : 157-162, 2001

    11 Leeflang MM, "Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy" 20 : 105-113, 2014

    12 Das S, "Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonographic features of gout in intercritical and chronic phase" 20 : 887-893, 2017

    13 Higgins JP, "Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis" 21 : 1539-1558, 2002

    14 Walter SD, "Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data" 21 : 1237-1256, 2002

    15 Wallace SL, "Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout" 20 : 895-900, 1977

    16 Ogdie A, "Performance of ultrasound in the diagnosis of gout in a multicenter study: comparison with monosodium urate monohydrate crystal analysis as the gold standard" 69 : 429-438, 2017

    17 Irwig L, "Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy" 48 : 119-130, 1995

    18 Egger M, "Meta-analysis: principles and procedures" 315 : 1533-1537, 1997

    19 Munafo MR, "Meta-analysis of genetic association studies" 20 : 439-444, 2004

    20 Trikalinos TA, "Meta-analysis methods" 60 : 311-334, 2008

    21 DerSimonian R, "Meta-analysis in clinical trials" 7 : 177-188, 1986

    22 Davey Smith G, "Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials" 350 : 1182-, 1997

    23 Zamora J, "Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data" 6 : 31-, 2006

    24 Simundic AM, "Measures of diagnostic accuracy: basic definitions" 19 : 203-211, 2009

    25 Filippucci E, "Hyaline cartilage involvement in patients with gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. An ultrasound study" 17 : 178-181, 2009

    26 Thompson SG, "How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?" 21 : 1559-1573, 2002

    27 Wright SA, "High-resolution ultrasonography of the first metatarsal phalangeal joint in gout: a controlled study" 66 : 859-864, 2007

    28 Okeh UM, "Evaluating measures of indicators of diagnostic test performance: fundamental meanings and formulars" 3 : 132-, 2012

    29 Loffler C, "Distinguishing gouty arthritis from calcium pyrophosphate disease and other arthritides" 42 : 513-520, 2015

    30 Thiele RG, "Diagnosis of gout by ultrasound" 46 : 1116-1121, 2007

    31 Moses LE, "Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations" 12 : 1293-1316, 1993

    32 Deeks J, "Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 1.0. 0" 2009

    33 Reitsma JB, "Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews" 58 : 982-990, 2005

    34 Harbord RM, "An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary" 61 : 1095-1103, 2008

    35 Lamers-Karnebeek FB, "Additive value for ultrasonographic signal in a screening algorithm for patients presenting with acute mono-/oligoarthritis in whom gout is suspected" 33 : 555-559, 2014

    36 Zufferey P, "A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis" 17 : 188-, 2015

    37 Dinnes J, "A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy" 9 : 1-113, 2005

    38 Rutter CM, "A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations" 20 : 2865-2884, 2001

    39 Whitehead A, "A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials" 10 : 1665-1677, 1991

    40 Neogi T, "2015 Gout Classification Criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative" 67 : 2557-2568, 2015

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2016-03-09 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Rheumatism Association -> Korean College of Rheumatology KCI등재
    2015-04-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of the Korean Rheumatism Association -> Journal of Rheumatic Diseases KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.1 0.1 0.08
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.08 0.09 0.242 0.09
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼