http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Skonicki, Douglas 성균관대학교 동아시아학술원 2011 Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies Vol.11 No.1
In this article, I analyze how the Song dynasty thinker Ouyang Xiu (1007-1072) and the Tokugawa intellectual Ogyu Sorai (1666-1728) employed a similar hermeneutics to repudiate the cosmological theories embraced by their contemporaries. Both men argued that the conceptions of the cosmos held by their peers were based on misinterpretations of the Confucian classics. They moreover asserted that the classics revealed the parameters of knowledge established by the ancient sages, which served to delimit the proper bounds of intellectual speculation. They contended that the cosmological theories propounded by their peers overstepped these bounds and that such theories were therefore unsubstantiated. On the basis of the above two claims, Ouyang and Sorai sought to replace the cosmological theories held by the majority of their contemporaries with what they asserted was the correct view of the relationship between the cosmos and humanity found in the classics.
( Douglas Skonicki ) 성균관대학교 동아시아학술원 2011 Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies Vol.11 No.1
In this article, I analyze how the Song dynasty thinker Ouyang Xiu (1007-1072) and the Tokugawa intellectual Ogyu Sorai (1666-1728) employed a similar hermeneutics to repudiate the cosmological theories embraced by their contemporaries. Both men argued that the conceptions of the cosmos held by their peers were based on misinterpretations of the Confucian classics. They moreover asserted that the classics revealed the parameters of knowledge established by the ancient sages, which served to delimit the proper bounds of intellectual speculation. They contended that the cosmological theories propounded by their peers overstepped these bounds and that such theories were therefore unsubstantiated. On the basis of the above two claims, Ouyang and Sorai sought to replace the cosmological theories held by the majority of their contemporaries with what they asserted was the correct view of the relationship between the cosmos and humanity found in the classics.