http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Oluwatosin Stephen Ilori,Peter Babalola Olaitan,Oluwatosin Ruth Ilori,Adebimpe Oyebisi Aderounmu 대한미용성형외과학회 2022 Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Vol.28 No.4
Background Following surgery or other types of trauma, scar formation occurs with wound healing because of the replacement of normal skin with fibrous tissue. The conversion of a normal scar to an abnormal scar usually occurs 6 to 8 weeks after surgery. Abnormal scars can be a source of patient dissatisfaction, especially following cosmetic surgical procedures. Therefore, supporting scars with tape after surgery is critical for reducing scar tension. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of patients’ satisfaction with their scar outcomes following microporous taping and to identify the determinants of scar satisfaction. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to compare the scar satisfaction of postsurgical patients who underwent scar taping with microporous tape to those who did not. The scars were assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery using the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS). The test group had microporous tape applied to their scars and the tape was worn 24 hours a day for a period of 6 months. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. Categorical variables and mean PSAS scores were compared using the chi-square test and repeatedmeasures analysis of variance, respectively. Results At 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months the taped group had significantly lower PSAS scores and higher satisfaction scores than the control group. Scar thickness and pruritus were statistically significant determinants of patient satisfaction. Conclusions Microporous tape is an effective modality for improving scar satisfaction in postsurgical patients.
Issues on the Categorial Status of ‘Òun’ in Yorùbá
Johnson Folorunso Ilori 세종대학교 언어연구소 2012 Journal of Universal Language Vol.13 No.2
This paper examines issues on the categorial status of òun in Yoruba grammar, particularly its status as conjunction. It draws insight from binding theory to show that in Standard Yoruba and other related dialects, such as Ìlàjė, òun is constantly anaphorically bound by the first of the two nominal constituents it purportedly coordinates in line with binding rule and binding principle ‘B’within the particular phrasal context where it is often analysed as conjunction. Relying on data from South-Eastern Yoruba dialects (Oǹdó and Ào) and a Central Yoruba dialect (Òmùò-Arárò̇mí)where there is clear cut evidence for two òun in the lexicon, one of which is non-referential unlike the òun in Standard Yoruba, the paper shows that the use of òun as conjunction in Ào, reported in Taiwo (2005), is not exclusive as there are other dialects in the language that do the same. The paper however provide additional evidence to demonstrate that the claim that òun is a conjunction in Yoruba based on the Ào data cannot be generalized to Standard Yoruba and other related dialects (e.g., Ìlàjė) where the non-referential òun found in Ào, Òmùò-Arárò̇mí, and Oǹdódialects is absent. These make argument in favour of the so-called conjunction òun in Standard Yoruba (School) grammar being a 3sg pronominal anaphor compelling.