韓國産 食用버섯중의 微量金屬元素의 含有量에 關한 硏究

魯一協 淑明女子大學校 1981 論文集 Vol.21 No.-

The sorts of trace mineral elements in Korean edible mushrooms studied in this paper are calcium, Magnesium, Iron, copper, Zinc, Manganese, Lead and Cadmium. The contents of these trace mineral elements are determined by means of Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Jarell-Ash 82-526). For convenience sake, let 12 species of mushrooms be represented as follows. S-1;Agaricus campestris Fr. S-2;Agaricus campestris S-3; Pholiota nameko (I. Ito) S. Ito et Imai S-4; Auricularia auricula-judae(Fr.) Que'l S-5; Tremella fuciformis Berk. S-6; Tricholoma matsutake (S. Ito et Imai)Sing. S-7; Pleurotus ostreatus Fr.Que'l S-8; Lentinus edodes Berk Sing. S-9; Ramaria botrytis (Pers.) Ricken S-10; Coprinus comatus(Fr.) S.F. Gray S-11; Gyrophora esculenta S-12; Flammulina Vertipes(Fr.) Sing. The results of analysis are shown in Table Ⅲand the results obtained from this study are as follows. 1) The content of calcium in twelve mushrooms is the most, and decrease in order Zn, Fe.Mg,Cu,Mn,Pb and Cd. 2) The gross contents of trace mineral elements are the most in S-6 species and decrease in order s-4,S-1,S-12,S-8, S-9,S-2,S-11,S-5,S-7,S-10 and S-3. 3) In s-6 species, the content of calcium is the most, and it contains a larger amount of Magnesium, Iron, copper and Manganese than the other mushrooms.

도이체 이데오로기에의 批判(上)

崔逸雲 全北大學校 1976 論文集 Vol.18 No.-

The points of the present theory are to be classified into two parts of contents; one is that of chapter 1,2, and 3, and the other that of chapter 4 and 5. Chapter 1 is on "Die heilige Familie oder Kritik der kritischen Kritik", chapter 2 on Bruno Bauer and his fellow scholars' speculative secret, and chapter 3 on Bruno Bauer and his problems. As is generally known, "Die deutsche Ideologie" contains the confutation theory by Marx and Engels against the contemporaries' theories. Then his style is too difficult and satrical to catch the meaning, and so I tried to make clear the meaning of the terms and appended some notes. In 1843, Bruno Bauer published the Journal "Allgemeine Literaturzeitung" at Scharteburg, in which he tried to criticize liberalism and radicalism, and their meaningless influence on society at that time. At the same times Marx and Engels wrote against Bruno Bauer and his brother's thought expressed in the journal "Allgemeine Literaturzeitung", Thus they criticized each other. And Marx and Engels published "Die heilige Familie...". in which they criticized Bruno Bauer's thought in "Allgemeine Literaturzeitung". In chapter 2, I stated Marx and Engels pointed out in "Die heilige Familie" that Bruno Bauer and Szeliga could not diverge from speculative secret. In other words, they pointed out the mistakes made by Bruno Bauer and Szeliga in explaining how the secret in idealistic thinking method works on general social life. Especially they criticized severely a popular novel "Mystres de Paris" written by Sue. In chapter 3, I stated Marx and Engels criticized in "Die heilige Familie..." Bruno Bauer's thought in regard to the problem of the Jews, political affairs, philosophy and socialism. Especially they criticized Hegels "die konkrete Allgemeinheit" in the viewpoint of dialectical materialism. Hegel's "die konkerete Allgemeinheit" means that the universal precedes the concrete. This reminds us of the arguement on universality in the Middle Ages, but Marx proved Hegel's theory to be false. Marx proved that the universal does not contain the concrete, nor makes it appear, and that the universal does not contain the concrete, nor makes it appear, and that the universal is extracted from the concrete. In chapter 4, Marx and Engels' criticism of Feuerbach's thought is stated. As is generally known, Feuerbach is well known for his "Wesen der Christentums" and "Vorlesung ueber das Wesen der Religion". He believed that God as well as Religion has his origin in human nature. He believed that God did not create man, but man created God. In this respect, we can be sure that Feuerbach denied the conventional view of religion. Marx and Engels may have agreed to this revolutional view of religion and they even praised Feuerbach. But they could not entierly bring themselves to endorse Feuerbach's theory. Marx and Engels reproached Feuerbach for being superficial because he failed to grasp the true meaning of life and religion from the viewpoint of their communism and historical materialism. Of course they did the same to those who did not follow them. Then what is my viewpoint of Marx and Engels thought? In chapter 5, I criticized Marx and Engels' thought. Here I expressed my point of view, criticizing Feuerbach's, Hegel's, and Stirner's philosophy, including Marx and Engels' view of history itself. I insist that the motive power of our history is not material productivity or material productive relation, but our spiritual power; that our history makes development when it has a positive thinking method, but it is depressed and decayed when it is under the control of a speculative thinking method. According to this theory, we shall be able to find out the dircetion of history. I criticized the works of Marx and Engels from the above point of view.

고산 윤선도 국문시가의 수사미학

전일환 한국고시가문학회 2003 한국시가문화연구 Vol.0 No.11

Gosan, YoonSunDo is one of the most famous Korean literaturer at the period of Chosun dynasty. He wrote the beautiful pieces of work such as Uhboosasisa and Sanjoongsingok. Even though he was the mentor of the king Hyo at the time, he had to go through the difficult and painful banishment time due to his strong and straightforward personality. He lived himself in the nature and tried to put his emotion towards the Korean literature to improve its quality by mending it beautifully. The main device in the poetry of Gosan shows that it is based on the Chinese Byungmoon. JungDaewoo, which is the method of using the similar or the same objects to create the beauty, BanDaewoo is the pair of contrary meaning and also Gwandaewoo is another device which is to use the relationship between the high and low, ascending, cause/effect and assumability. All these devices are the method of Gosans literary work. Firstly, Gosan took pleasure to use the technique of JungDaewoo to bring out the harmony naturally to improve the quality of its aesthetic value. This device is the technique of contrasting the similar or the same objects to bring out the harmony smoothly and comfortably. Secondly, the meaning that the author wants to send out is clearly done by using the technique of BanDaewoo. It seems that contrasting objects help the reader/receiver to understand more clearly and it also creates the same feeling and strong emotion towards the pieces of his work. It shows the increases of realness and the feeling of movement in his work. Thirdly, Gosans sentence is much better than Song gang jungchuls one. This is resulted by his usage of Gwandaewoo which shows the smoothness of the relationship between high/low, the breathe of the relationship between cause/effect and also the relationship between the conditional/relative clauses in his beautiful sentences. It means his stylish devices of Korean language are so soft and beautiful that his emotion is naturally brought into his work of art. From this profile, Gosan does not only increase the dimension of the Korean literature but also shows that he was treated as one of the distinguished poets at the period of Chosun dynasty.

認識次元의 設定을 爲한 試論

崔逸雲 全北大學校 1973 論文集 Vol.15 No.-

주체적 인식의 차원과 객체적 인식의 차원에 관한 것을 개괄적으로 해명하면 우리가 그동안 본질적으로 대립하는 성질을 가졌기 때문에 통일할 수 없는 것으로만 생각하여 오던 여러 가지 문제가 인식의 차원의 설정으로써 해명된다는 것이다. 자유성과 필연성, 당위성과 존재성, 목적성과 기계성의 문제도 그렇다. 그것은 칸트가 생각한 것 같이 요청으로서만 인정하여야 할 것도 또 그러한 방법 이외에 증명되지 않는 것도 아니며 레이몽이나 Malebanche가 생각한 것처럼 불가사의한 것도 아니다. 그것들이 증명되지 않고 요청으로 밖에 인정할 수 없다거나 또는 불가사의하였다는 것은 그들이 인식의 차원이라는 것을 이해하지 못하였기 때문이다. 물론 우리의 일상의 사고에 있어서는 이 양자의 구분은 편리하기도 하다. 다시 말하면 자유성과 필연성, 당위성과 존재성, 목적성과 기계성을 구분하여 생각하는 것은 퍽 편리하다. 그러나 그렇다고 해서 그것들의 본질이 이질적이라 생각하고 있다면 그것은 잘못된 사고방식이다. 그러므로 인식의 차원을 이해하고 그러한 구분을 받아들이면서 그것의 통일적인 성격을 이해한다면 인식에 있어서 종래의 사고방식으로는 생각지도 못할 시야가 전개될 것이다.

도이체 이데오로기의 批判(下)

崔逸雲 全北大學校 1977 論文集 Vol.19 No.-

唯物史觀의 批判

崔逸雲 全北大學校 1970 論文集 Vol.12 No.-

Russell哲學에 있어서 問題点의 分析 (2) : 數理와 論理 및 記述

崔逸雲 全北大學校 1979 論文集 Vol.21 No.-

This treatise is not concerned with all the fields of Russell's philosophy, but only with some parts of it. I think more problematic issues in Russell's philosophy are as follows : (1) the Theory of Type (2) the theory that mathematics can be deduced from logical principles (3) the Theory of Description I have written a treatise concerning the Theory of Type in my own critical viewpoint. Now I intend to write about Russell's though that mathematics can be deduced from logical principles, that is, logic and mathematics have the same ground in their foundation. But inspite of his efforts, he could not succeed in making an adequate verification in his illustrations. First, Russell had tried to find the principles in the logical constants and implication. But I firmly assert that we could not admit such words as principles, because these are also found out in the proposition of sciences such as physics, chemistry, botany, zoology, philosophy, etc… Secondly, Russell's ten axioms could not elucidate the principles that logic and mathematics have the same foundation, hence axioms have no strict relation to logic and mathematics. Though axioms are divided into many kinds, the main characters of them are nothing but implication. Thirdly, all individuals and concrete statements are reduced to propositional function in Russll's method. But I think that most statements have become obscure by such a method, that perhaps such a method is originated from the plan of simbolization of everything. And so I could not agree with him. Fourthly, Rusesll himself who was against Hegel's idealism fell into the hole of the same idealism as result of taking all mathematics as nonempirical elements origination from universality. Such a method can not help being self-contradiction though Russell thinks his method is scientific and accurate. Fifthly, "description" is also a very obscure theory. Russell named a sentence the infiniite-description, when it has article "a" before the predicative word, and definite description, when it has "the" before the predicative word. More accurately speaking, infinite descriptionis a phrase of a-so-and-so, and definite description is the-so-and-so. Again Russell selected in words, a, the any, some, all, and every, in "on denoting" and "Denothing Phrase", but its elucidation is not so clear. To sum up, above mentioned problems are the most problematical in Russell's though, But as far as I have researched it, it is the most confused and controversial theory, I think.

말굽버섯의 프로테아제에 關한 硏究

魯一協 淑明女子大學校 1984 論文集 Vol.25 No.-

To investigate proteolytic components in Korean higher fungus, Fomes fermentarius (Fr.) Kickx belonging to the family Polyporaceae was collected at Kwangneung in Gyeonggi province. The fungus was extracted with cooling water and salted out by ammonium sulfate. The precipitate was purified by diaysing through visking tube. And the enzyme fraction was obtained as light brown powder after freeze-drying and determined its proteolytic activity. The protease is stable below 45℃ and the pH range from 4.0 to 6.0 and is completly inactivated at 60℃ and 15 minutes. The optimum condition for the enzyme reaction was temperature of 38℃ and pH 5.0. The enzyme activity was not influenced in the presence of Ca^2+ and Fe^2+, which inhibited by Cu^2+ and Na^2+.

10Å Manganite와 δ-MnO_(2)의 부유성에 관한 연구

엄제현,김익수,성일용,김종윤,김진석 三陟大學校 2006 論文集 Vol.39 No.-

For the purpose of researching the floatability of 10Å Manganite and δ-MnO_(2) from Manganese layer, the test was performed by means of the Zeta potential measuring and the floatation experiment for 10Å Manganite, δ-MnOcc. The floatation condition in the floatation experiment were as follow. Sample : δ-MnO_(2), 10Å Manganite from Manganese layer Sample size : 65mesh ~ 200mesh. condition time : 10min. Flotation time : 4 min. Air amount : 20ml/min. Promoter : DACl, NaDS, Kerosene Dpresser : Na_(2)SiO_(2)(Water glass) PH regulator : HCl, CaO From the above test the floatation result were summerized as follow. 1) It was PH 2.3 that the PZC of the 10Å Manganite - rich from Manganese nodule in the ξ - potential measuring. 2) It was PH 3.0 that the PZC of the δ-MnO_(2)- rich from Mangnaese nodule in the ξ - potential measuring. 3) It was 35% using DACl 15mg/l at PH 2.7 that the most difference of floatability of the δ-MnO_(2)- rich and 10Å Manganite - rich.

Todorokite와 δ-MnO₂의 浮遊性에 關한 硏究

엄제현,김익수,성일용,김종윤,김진석 三陟大學校 産業科學技術硏究所 2004 産業科學技術硏究論文集 Vol.9 No.1

For the purpose of reserching the floatability of Manganese-nodule, the test was porformed by means of the Zeta potential measuring and the flotation experiment for Todorokite, δ-MnO₂ The flotation condition in the flotation experiment were as follow. sample : Todorokite, δ-MnO₂ sample size : 65 mesh - 200 mesh condition time : 10 min flotation time : 4 min air amount : 20 ㎖/min promoter : D.A.Cl, S.D.S pH regulator : HCl, CaO From the above test the flotation result were summerized as follow. 1. The point of zero charge(PZC) of Todorokite in the Zeta potential measuring was pH4.3. 2. The point of zero charge of δ-MnO₂ in the Zeta potential measuring was pH3.0. 3. The best floatability of 8 δ-MnO₂ was 85% as a function of pH3.5 using DACl 10㎎/ℓ 4. The best floatability of Todorokite was 40% as a function of pH3.5 using DACl 10㎎/ℓ 5. The most difference of floatability of the δ -MnO₂ and Todorokite was 40% using DACl 10m㎎/ℓ at pH3.5