http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Eun-Shil Kim(김은실) (검색결과 30 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
유색작물의 Cyanidin-3-Glucoside 최적 추출분석
김은실,신진철,정하숙,Kim, Eun-Shil,Shin, Jin-Chul,Chung, Ha-Sook 한국작물학회 2006 Korean journal of crop science Vol.51 No.suppl1
Anthocyanins are water-soluble glycosides and acylglycosides of anthocyanidins, having different color variations due to its substitution patterns. Anthocyanins, present in various fruits, vegetables and crops as natural colorant, have been well characterized for its bioactive properties, anti-oxidant, anti-cancer, anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory properties. During extraction and purification, the factors, such as pH, temperature, oxygen, light, enzymes, nucleophilic agents, sugar derivatives and co-pigments, have affected on anthocyanin stability. For this reason, the extraction method should be thoroughly checked for the qualitative/quantitative analysis of anthocyanin in particular plant material. To identify the optimum extraction method of cyanidin-3-glucoside, major anthocyanin of dark purple-colored grains, Oryza sativa cv. Heugjinjubyeo, Phaselous vulgaris, Phynchosia gngularis, Sesamum indium, Rhynchosia nulubilis and Lablab purpureus, reversed-phase HPLC analysis using solvent system of acetonitrile, methanol and water were accomplished.
-
-
-
공사영역에 대한 여성인류학의 문제제기 : 비교문화적 논쟁
김은실(Kim Eun-Shil) 이화여자대학교 한국여성연구원 1996 여성학논집 Vol.13 No.-
Since the 1970s the oppositional model of public and private has been widly used to discuss the lower status of women cross-culturally. The concepts of public and private entered into feminist studies primarily through the works of cultural anthropologists. It was especially Michelle Rosaldo who suggested the oppositional model between domestic and public domains as a way of explaining women's lower status in a wide variety of historical and social settings. This article examines the way in which Rosado's model of public/private division has been discussed in the Western feminist studies particularly in feminist anthropology and reviews its theoretical and methodological debates for cross-cultural settings. Rosaldo, in her 1974 articled, escribed the relationship between women's lower status and public and private model as follows: Sexual asymmetry is universal based not in terms of biology per se but in terms of the fact that a good part of a woman's adult life is spent giving birth to and raising children in most societies; that because of these responsibilties women participate relatively less than men in public life; that this leads to a differentiation of domestic and public spheres of activities; and that such structural differentiation affects men's and women's relative psychological, cultural, political and economic experiences in given societies. From this fact, women and men's universal social arrangement are organized into public and private domains and sexual asymmetry is constructed. Rosaldo made some points about this; first, in all known societies male activities are more highly valued than female activities; second, universal sexual asymmetry is a culturally legitimated; third, though women exert important pressures on the social life of the group, they generally do so through informal influence and power rather than through formal authority. Therefore, women's status would be lowest in those societies where there is a firm differentiation between domestic and public spheres of activity and where women are isolated from one another. Rosaldo's model has had much influences upon many women scholars in 1970s and the early 1980s. At the same time, however, various criticisms against this model have been advanced. Many feminist scholars including anthropologists who carried their own fieldworks in various cultures argued the universal applicability of Rosaldo's model by problematizing the universalality of women's subordination in variour cultures; the Western-centric epistemological and methodological assumptions of the public and the private which have derived from the Victorian social thought; and the identification between the concepts of woman and motherhood. They also pointed out theoretical and cenceptual vagueness about this model by questioning the way in which the divisions are organized and the concepts of power, anthority, and woman are constructed in various cultures. Upon these responses to her original formulation, Rosaldo herself examined her domestic/public model and reposited her model as a tool to problematize the political relationship between public and private, and gender relations as well. Rosaldo, in her 1980 article "The use and abuse of anthropology," reasserted the significance for the public status of women's reproductive role as the basis of the public and private divisions. She argued in her article that the vast majority of opportunities for public influence and prestige were all recognizead as men's privilege and right in all known human groups. She criticized women scholars who emphasized situations in which women enjoyed the use of power because that this kind of works reinforced the idea of gender differences as essential attributions to men and women. She also stated that this kind of work neglected the fact that what we had to do was to change the world in which men and women utlimately lived together. Particularly upon the Marxist feminists who emphasized the w
-
김은실(Kim Eun-Shil) 나혜석학회 2016 나혜석연구 Vol.9 No.-
본 논문은 1920년대 최고의 문제적 소설가인 염상섭이 신여성 나혜석의 결혼을 모델로 하여 쓴 동아일대 신문연재 소설 「해바라기」를 다룬다. 나혜석과 일본 유학 시절 매우 가까운 친구관계를 유지했던 염상섭은 개인적으로 알고 있는 나혜석과 나혜석을 둘러싼 남성들의 이야기를 소설화하여 심리적 내면을 묘사하는 새로운 소설 양식을 창조해냈다. 본 논문은 이러한 사건이 나혜석에게 어떤 영향을 미치는지 그리고 당시의 남성 지식인들은 자신들이 알고 있는 나혜석을 어떻게 평가하는지를 살펴보면서 남성지식인 사회에서 인기인이었던 나혜석의 위치성을 드러내고자 하였다. 그리고 이러한 모델소설을 통해 염상섭이 성취한 것은 무엇이었고, 신여성을 소재화하면서 여성에 대해 고정된 그리고 부정적인 이미지를 만들어내고 있는 염상섭의 여성경멸과 여성혐오의 기원이 무엇인지를 살펴보고자 하였다. This article deals with the novel Sunflower written as a serial story for the Dong-A Ilbo(Dong-A Daily News) by the most problematic Korean novelist of the 1920s, Yeom Sang-Seop. Sunflower was modeled after the modern woman Na Hye-Seok and her marriage. Yeom Sang-Seop, who formed a close friendship with Rha Hyeseok during their days in Japan as overseas students, created a new mode of novel writing by focusing on the actual relationship between Rha Hyeseok and the men around her and describing the psychological inner emotion and changes among them. In this article, I examine the effects this novel had on Rha Hyeseok and how the male intellectuals of the time viewed her, thereby illuminating her situationality as a woman of great popularity within an intellectual circle dominated by men. I also look into the achievements that Yeom Sang-Seop was able to claim through this modeling novel as well as the misogynistic origins behind the fixed and negative images of women in his treatment of the modern women as a writer.
-
-
-
-
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
