http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Eor (검색결과 28 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
어수용(Eor, Soo-Yong) 한국재산법학회 2011 재산법연구 Vol.27 No.3
Duty of explanation demanded in the process of making contract is based on the principle of good faith. The Precident says that this duty is derived from law, contract, customs or common logic. Duty of explanation in negotiation toward contract can be classified as subordinate duty compared with primary duty. This duty, on which agreement is settled, can be classified duty in contract. Likewise responsibility on this duty constitutes responsibility of contract and following effect occurs. In rest of all case, duty of explanation can be classified as responsibility of tort. Duty of explanation is composed of three elements ; negotiation, profit of disclosure and intention. Profit of disclosure is admitted for protection to the right of option or weak person to information. If negative elements emerges, profit of disclosure is denied. The right of option should be assured to alienation of real property. But profit of resale or current price are presuggested conditions, so that neccesity to explain those conditions can be denied. It is the most attracting point, being quoted from this precedent, whether it is possible to completely assign the ownership of objective, as a capital duty, or not. On the contrary, duty of information supply, as a subordinate duty, should be determined regarding to accessibility to information among concerned parties in the range of intersection between the principle of self-determination freedom and the principle of good faith. By the way, maket conditions, in alienation contract of real property, such as attainability of advantageous purchasability and profit of resale are open to any one. Because recognising those maket conditions can be easily expected, duty of disclosure to those maket conditions is denied. In conclusion this precident is meaningful as the suggestion of definite standard denying responsibility of explanation in alienation contract of real property. 계약체결과정에서 요구되는 설명의무는 신의성실의 원칙에 근거한다. 판례는 이러한 설명의무는 법률상 규정에 의하거나, 계약, 관습, 조리상의 일반원칙에 의하여 발생한다고 하고 있다. 계약교섭단계에서의 설명의무는 주된 의무와 대비하여 부수적 의무의 성질을 갖고 있고, 본계약과는 별도로 설명의무에 관한 합의가 있는 등의 경우에는 그 설명의무는 계약상 의무로 볼 수 있다. 이러한 설명의무를 위반한 경우 계약상 의무에 대해서는 계약책임이 성립하고 그에 따른 법적 효과가 발생한다. 그 이외의 경우에는 원칙적으로 불법행위 책임으로 구성한다. 계약체결과정에서의 설명의무의 성립요건으로는 계약의 교섭, 고지할 이익의 존재, 고의 과실 등이 있다. 그 중 고지할 이익은 선택권의 보호를 위하여 또는 정보적 약자의 보호차원에서 인정되는 반면, 고지할 이익이 부정되는 소극적 요건도 있다. 분양계약에 있어서 목적물의 권리이전이나 취득, 사용, 수익에 관련된 사항에 대해서는 선택권이 보장된다. 그러나 전매이익, 목적물의 시가 등은 계약의 목적달성이나 실행 이전에 이미 고려되거나 전제된 사항이므로 매도인은 이에 관하여 설명할 의무가 없다. 대상판결의 부동산 분양계약에서도 당사자에게는 주된 의무로서 목적물의 이전 및 사용, 수익에 관한 내용이 중요한 관심사항이다. 나아가 계약체결과 관련하여 그 밖의 중요한 정보제공의무는 자기결정의 원리와 신뢰의 원칙이 교차되는 영역에서 각 당사자에게 균등한 접근 가능성을 고려하여 결정하여야 한다. 그런데 분양계약에서 목적물의 유리한 매수가능성이나 전매이익 등과 같은 시장상황은 누구에게나 그 취득가능성이 열려 있다. 따라서 계약교섭과정에서 그 인식을 일반적으로 기대할 수 있는 이러한 정보에 관하여는 고지의무가 부인된다. 대상판결은 부동산 분양계약에서의 설명의무가 부인되는 명확한 기준을 제시한 것으로서 의미가 있다.
-
-
Food System Proposal and Strategies in APEC
( Myong Keun Eor ),( Se Ik Oh ) 한국농촌경제연구원 2003 Journal of Rural Development Vol.26 No.1
This study tried to both enlighten the background and intrinsic perspectives of the APEC food system and provide logical bases for food importing members. Since food exporting member economies were persistent to insert trade issues into the agenda of ATCWG, a strategic approach to the AFS issue in the ATCWG is required for importing economies. Implementation of the AFS would destroy many trade barriers in food importing countries. According to the APEC principles of voluntarism and flexibility, food importing members can minimize the impact of trade liberalization on domestic food and agricultural production. At the same time, they should emphasize that there are other mechanisms dealing with food trade issues both inside and outside the ATCWG. Importing members also should persuade the exporting members to expand their exports but not to dominate the market.
-
Effects of FTA Among China, Japan and Korea on Agriculture
( Myong Keun Eor ),( Bae Sung Kim ),( Joo Myung Heo ) 한국농촌경제연구원 2005 Journal of Rural Development Vol.28 No.1
The effects of the Free Trade Agreement among China, Japan and Korea on Korean agriculture (CJK FTA) can be measured by Korean agricultural simulation model KREI-ASMO. Simulation results show that reductions in total agricultural income will occur at the range from 14 percent to 22 percent in 2014 depending on the coverage of the FTA. The impacts on agricultural income will be smaller when rice is excluded from the FTA. Also, Potential Bilateral Trade (PBT) indicated that the CJK FTA may result in significant increases in agricultural trade deficits against China and some decrease in trade surplus against Japan.
-
-
-
Ju Young Eor,Nahyun Park,Yoon Ji Son,Sae Hun Kim 한국축산식품학회 2021 한국축산식품학회지 Vol.41 No.3
This study aimed to assess the anti-inflammatory effect of Lactobacillus casei 3260 (LC) alone and LC-fermented Gleditsia sinensis thorn (GST) extract in mouse model of type II collagen induced rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In our previous work, we confirmed the anti-inflammatory effects of LC and GST against LPS-induced inflammation in vitro. In this study, LC and GST were fermented and their effects were assessed in an animal model of RA. Both LC and fermented GST (fGST) treatment reduced mice serum nitrite and total cholesterol and triggered myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity. In addition, both LC and fGST reduced inflammation-related serum biomarkers such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17, and IL-1β. As per the morphological analysis, both LC and fGST protected hind paw joints against RA, and its related mRNA markers improved. Finally, arthritis scores were measured as an indicator of RA of the whole experimental period; the scores suggested that both LC and fGST protect against collagen-induced RA-related inflammation in a mouse model.
-
Reseach Note : Measuring the Effects of Trade Liberalization in Agriculture
( Myong Keun Eor ) 한국농촌경제연구원 2000 Journal of Rural Development Vol.23 No.1
This paper specified an import demand function to measure the effects of trade liberalization more precisely. Using monthly data rather than annual data on import quantity, prices, and income, this study can reflect recent changes in consumer`s tastes and patterns of expenditure. Under the assumption of tariff abolition, import of grape would increase to 27 thousand tons as the price fall to 1,600 won per kilogram by 2010. It has negative impacts on grape and pear producers` income. Even though considering positive effects on consumer`s surplus, the loss of producer`s revenue would be 5,190 million won in 2010.
-
KCI
스콜라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
