http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Eiichiro Iwata,Hideki Shigematsu,Kazuya Inoue,Takuya Egawa,Masato Tanaka,Akinori Okuda,Yasuhiko Morimoto,Keisuke Masuda,Yusuke Yamamoto,Yoshihiro Sakamoto,Munehisa Koizumi,Yasuhito Tanaka 대한척추외과학회 2018 Asian Spine Journal Vol.12 No.1
Study Design: Case–control study. Purpose: The aim of the present study was to identify physical findings useful for differentiating between cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) and rotator cuff tears to prevent the misdiagnosis of CSA as a rotator cuff tear. Overview of Literature: CSA and rotator cuff tears are often confused among patients presenting with difficulty in shoulder elevation. Methods: Twenty-five patients with CSA and 27 with rotator cuff tears were enrolled. We included five physical findings specific to CSA that were observed in both CSA and rotator cuff tear patients. The findings were as follows: (1) weakness of the deltoid muscle, (2) weakness of the biceps muscle, (3) atrophy of the deltoid muscle, (4) atrophy of the biceps muscle, and (5) swallow-tail sign (assessment of the posterior fibers of the deltoid). Results: Among 25 CSA patients, 10 (40.0%) were misdiagnosed with a rotator cuff tear on initial diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of each physical finding were as follows: (1) deltoid weakness (sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 55.6%), (2) biceps weakness (sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 100%), (3) deltoid atrophy (sensitivity, 96.0%; specificity, 77.8%), (4) biceps atrophy (sensitivity, 88.8%; specificity, 92.6%), and (5) swallow-tail sign (sensitivity, 56.0%; specificity, 74.1%). There were statistically significant differences in each physical finding. Conclusions: CSA is likely to be misdiagnosed as a rotator cuff tear; however, weakness and atrophy of the biceps are useful findings for differentiating between CSA and rotator cuff tears to prevent misdiagnosis.
Eiichiro Iwata,Hideki Shigematsu,Akinori Okuda,Yasuhiko Morimoto,Keisuke Masuda,Hiroshi Nakajima,Munehisa Koizumi,Yasuhito Tanaka 대한척추외과학회 2016 Asian Spine Journal Vol.10 No.6
Study Design: Case control study. Purpose: To identify the most significant laboratory marker for early detection of surgical site infection (SSI) using multiple logistic regression analysis. Overview of Literature: SSI is a serious complication of spinal instrumentation surgery. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the laboratory data of patients who underwent posterior lumbar instrumentation surgery for degenerative spinal disease from January 2003 to December 2014. Six laboratory markers for early SSI detection were considered: renewed elevation of the white blood cell count, higher at 7 than 4 days postoperatively; renewed elevation of the C-reactive protein (CRP) level, higher at 7 than 4 days postoperatively; CRP level of >10 mg/dL at 4 days postoperatively; neutrophil percentage of >75% at 4 days postoperatively; lymphocyte percentage of <10% at 4 days postoperatively; and lymphocyte count of <1,000/μL at 4 days postoperatively. Results: Ninety patients were enrolled; five developed deep SSI. Multivariate regression analysis showed that a lymphocyte count of <1,000/μL at 4 days postoperatively was the sole significant independent laboratory marker for early detection of SSI (p =0.037; odds ratio, 11.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–122.7). Conclusions: A lymphocyte count of <1,000/μL at 4 days postoperatively is the most significant laboratory marker for early detection of SSI.
Eiichiro Iwata,Hideki Shigematsu,Munehisa Koizumi,Hiroshi Nakajima,Akinori Okuda,Yasuhiko Morimoto,Keisuke Masuda,Yasuhito Tanaka 대한척추외과학회 2016 Asian Spine Journal Vol.10 No.2
Study Design: Case-control study. Purpose: To identify the characteristics of candidate indexes for early detection of surgical site infection (SSI). Overview of Literature: SSI is a serious complication of spinal instrumentation surgery. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial for the welfare of the patient postoperation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed laboratory data of patients who underwent posterior lumbar instrumentation surgery for degenerative spine disease. The sensitivity and specificity of six laboratory markers for early detection of SSI were calculated: greater elevation of the white blood cell count at day 7 than at day 4 postoperatively, greater elevation of the C-reactive protein (CRP) level at day 7 than at day 4 postoperatively, a CRP level of >10 mg/dL at 4 days postoperatively, neutrophil percentage of >75% at 4 days postoperatively, a lymphocyte percentage of <10% at 4 days postoperatively, and a lymphocyte count of <1,000/μL at 4 days postoperatively. Statistical analysis was via Fisher’s exact test and a p -value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: In total, 85 patients were enrolled. Of these, five patients developed deep SSI. The sensitivity and specificity of each index were as follows: index 1, 20.0% and 77.5%; index 2, 20.0% and 83.8%; index 3, 40.0% and 97.5%; index 4, 40.0% and 86.3%; index 5, 0% and 96.3%; and index 6, 80.0% and 80.0%. A significant difference was noted for indexes 3 and 6. Conclusions: A CRP level of >10 mg/dL at 4 days postoperatively would be useful for definitive diagnosis of SSI, and a lymphocyte count of <1,000/μL at 4 days postoperatively would be a useful screening test for SSI. Although laboratory markers for early detection of SSI have been frequently reported, we believe that it is important to understand the characteristics of each index for a precise diagnosis.