http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Detlef Staude 강원대학교 인문과학연구소 2016 Journal of Humanities Therapy Vol.7 No.2
The author, the main organizer of the 14th ICPP in Bern in 2016, looks back on the conference, it's positive outcomes and it's deficiencies. From those experiences onwards he reflects on the situation and relevance of ICPP's in the movement of philosophical practice today and asks, whether other institutions like a regular international newsletter might be needed to promote the development of philosophical practice and to keep the movement together.
Detlef Staude 강원대학교 인문과학연구소 2018 Journal of Humanities Therapy Vol.9 No.1
The review is a quest for the main issue of the reviewed book from Lydia Amir, Rethinking Philosophers’ Responsibility. It describes in short the content of its 15 different chapters and tries to judge - seriously and with humor - their relevance on their own and in the book publication as a whole.
Protagoras: A Cultural Theorist and Philosophical Practitioner?
( Detlef Staude ) 한국철학상담치료학회 2017 철학 실천과 상담 Vol.7 No.-
What essentially is philosophical practice? - If someone wants to answer this profound and often asked question, one can do this with the help of a traditional philosophical method, namely asking for the offspring of it, the arché. By doing so, one might have a look at the founders of the nowadays movement of philosophical practice, but one also can go back in time to the foundations of occidental philosophy itself.
Philosophical Practice as Mind-opening Dialog Towards Freedom and Vivification
Detlef Staude 강원대학교 인문과학연구소 2015 Journal of Humanities Therapy Vol.6 No.2
The author argues that philosophical practice is neither therapy nor application of philosophy. Instead he refers on the Aristotelian distinction between praxis and poiesis and sees philosophical practice as a mind-opening dialog unable to intend particular results. Nevertheless philosophical practice owns a force near to therapeutic potentials: the effects which reflections, questions and ideas have on people and on everyday life on the one hand and its vivifying potential on the other. He illustrates this by the example of a successful long-term course on the history of philosophical ideas. The author shows the differences between a school lesson or a usual university course of today and a seminar which is held in the attitude of philosophical practice. Philosophical practice for him is an inspiring adventurous exercise which leads to vivification and inner freedom.
Detlef Keese 한독사회과학회 2010 한독사회과학회 국제학술대회 Vol.2010 No.1
학술 문헌과 같은 공적인 논의에서 독일 경제에 있어 중소기업의 의미는 제기되고 있지는 않지만, 중소기업의 정확한 범위는 분명하지 않다. 이는 중소기업뿐만 아니라 가족 기업의 집단에서도 해당된다. 그래서 먼저 실용적으로 작동 가능해야만 하는 명확한 정의가 필요하다. 여기에서는 중소기업의 특성과 그에서 유래하는 움직이는 경제에 대한 결과를 고려해야만 한다. 결과적으로 보면 독일 기업지도는 중소기업과 가족기업에 의해 명백하게 형성되어 있음이 드러난다. 그동안 통일 이후 신연방주와 이전의 연방주간 기 업구조는 꽤나 동화(균형화)되었지만 그럼에도 아직 더 큰 기업계층에서는 차이가 나타나고 있다. 이러한 특성은 가족기업에서도 마찬가지이다. 중소기업의 큰 의미 그리고 그 들의 독특한 특성 때문에 이들 기업 세그먼트를 특히 공적인 수단을 통해 지원할 근거는 충분하다. 이러한 지원은 유럽연합, 연방, 주 등에서 자치단체에 이르기 까지 각종 지원 프로그램을 통해 광범위하게 진행되고 있다. 내용상으로 지원 조치는 실제로 재정조달, 상담, 자격부여, 연구개발 및 판매 등에서 이루어진다.
Detlef Garz 숙명여자대학교 아시아여성연구원 2015 OMNES: The Journal of Multicultural Society Vol.6 No.1
Korean migrant workers, nurses and miners, left their homeland for theFederal Republic of Germany in the 1960s and 1970s. All spent their earlyadulthood there. About one third stayed in Germany into late adulthood, mostof them marrying (nurses either married a Korean or a German and minersusually married a Korean) and having children who, in turn, are currently inearly adulthood. The first-generation migrant workers have spent the longestpart of their lives in Germany. Having now reached the age of retirement,some of them are reflecting on going back to Korea, and some have madethe first move or have already “crossed the Rubicon.” A small number havesettled in Korea’s south in a place that became known as the German Village(Dogil Maeul). In this article, three aspects of this migration and return migrationprocess will be discussed: first, going to and living in Germany, second,pondering going back to Korea after retirement, and third, living together withtheir spouses in Korea’s German Village.
Detlef Keese 한독사회과학회 2010 한독사회과학논총 Vol.20 No.2
Obwohl in der öffentlichen Diskussion wie in der Literatur die Bedeutung des Mittelstands für die deutsche Wirtschaft nicht in Frage gestellt wird, ist doch die genaue Abgrenzung des Mittelstands nicht eindeutig. Dies gilt sowohl in Bezug auf die kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen wie auch für die Gruppe der Familienunternehmen. Daher * Univ. Mannheim, Deutschland. keese@ifm.uni-mannheim.de sind hier zu¬nächst definitorische Klärungen notwendig, die auch praktikabel operationalisierbar sein müssen. Dabei sind die Eigenheiten der kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen und die sich daraus ergebenden Konsequenzen für eine funktionierende Wirtschaft zu berücksichtigen. Schließlich zeigt sich, dass die deutsche Unternehmenslandschaft eindeutig von den klei¬nen und mittleren Unternehmen sowie auch von den Familienunternehmen geprägt ist. Auch wenn sich mittlerweile die Unternehmensstruktur zwischen den alten und den neuen Bundesländern seit der Wiedervereinigung ziemlich angeglichen hat, so lassen sich doch noch bei den größeren Unternehmensklassen Unterschiede erkennen. Diese Feststellung hat auch in Bezug auf die Familienunternehmen ihre Gültigkeit. Trotz oder wegen der großen Bedeutung der kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen und ihrer spezifischen Eigen¬heiten gibt es gute Gründe, dieses Unternehmenssegment besonders mit öffentlichen Mitteln zu fördern. Dies geschieht auf breiter Basis von der Europäischen Union, dem Bund, den Ländern bis hin zu den Kommunen in mannigfaltigen Förderprogrammen. Inhaltlich betreffen die Fördermaßnahmen im Wesentlichen die Bereiche Finanzierung, Beratung und Qualifizierung, Forschung und Entwicklung sowie den Absatz.