RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        One again on Udayana’s treatment of the Negative Particle ‘Nañ’

        Om Nath Bimali 한국외국어대학교 인도연구소 2016 남아시아연구 Vol.22 No.1

        The Navya Nyaya vaiseshik tradition of the Indian philosophical schools perceives reality as existent, knowable and verbal. The world of realities for this tradition consists of positive entities as well as negative entities. The Śabdabodha literature presents a lengthy, fuller and very detailed descriptions of the processes involved in the generation of verbal understanding communicating the positive entities. But aparts from Raghunath Shiromani’s Nañvāda no other text is known to be presenting a fuller treatment of the issues of communicating the negative entities. However, a noteworthy development has taken place recently with the publication of Nañvādākārikā from Nagoya in Japan. The present paper attempts to understand the Linguistic philosophy of the communication of Negative entities outline by Udayan, the author of the text.

      • KCI등재

        औचित्य का कावत्व : स्वरूप, सन्दर्भ और समस्याएँ

        ????? ?????(Om Nath Bimali) 한국외국어대학교 인도연구소 2016 남아시아연구 Vol.21 No.3

        Auchitya as the soul of poetry: it"s references and problems. The question as to what constitutes the idea of poetry evokes the emergence of certain notions in our mind. All those notions are somehow or the other related to poetry. The said notions can be seen as the poetical elements. Those notions play different rules and contribute something or the other, thus helping a certain linguistic expression received the persona of poetry. But among all those poetical elements what is that element whose presence enables a linguistic expression to be designated as poetry and whose absence debars it from being a case of poetry, irrespective of the presence of other poetic elements? What is the very essence of poetry? What is it to be a case of poetry? What is the soul of poetry? This has all along remained the most significant question in the history of literary criticism in India. A mere glance into the tradition would reveal the fact that the Indian savants of literary art, have delved very deep into these questions. In fact their engagement with this very question was so intensive, so expensive, so full and so fertile that this paved the way for emergence and development of Indian science of literary criticism. One of the six schools fundamentally differed from others when it comes to the idea of the soul of the overall phenomenon called ‘Poetry’. Unlike other schools, the present school did not see a particular, traditionally perceptible poetic element constituting the idea of poetry. Rather, the appropriate synthesis of all poetic elements on the part of the poet constitutes the idea of Poetry. This theory is known as the theory of “Auchitya” and its propounder was a 10<SUP>th</SUP> or 11<SUP>th</SUP> Century critique ‘Kshemendra’. This article aims at critically examine the theory, its historicity and the problems it brings. This paper also sums up the modern contributions on this poetic notion.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼