RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • Competition and Global Competitiveness:

        Amelia L. Belloa,Rolando T. Bellob,John Jasper M. Corianac 아시아무역학회 2017 Journal of Asia Trade and Business Vol.4 No.2

        This paper takes a look at the experiences of Romania and the Philippines, two countries which have established a Competition Commission to promote and maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct. Competition is distinguished from competitiveness; the former is a type of market structure while the later argues that the economic competitiveness of the country is determined by the business environment. In 2016, the Philippines created the Philippine Competition Commission to promote and maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct. Meanwhile, the Romanian Competition Council which was established in 1996 enforces and ensures the application of the national and community rules on competition. The paper also explores the trend in the Global Competiveness Index for the two countries. Both countries scored best in the Basic Requirement sub-index but fared poorly in the Sophistication and Innovation Factors sub-index. For the period 2012-2017, both countries had continuously posted the highest scores for Macroeconomic Environment and Health and Primary Education. The Philippines did poorly in Infrastructure and Innovation. For Romania, the lowest scores were for Institutions and Innovation.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼