http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
GLOBAL BOND MARKETS: DETERMINANTS OF GOVERNMENT BORROWING COSTS FOR DEVELOPED AND EMERGING MARKETS
Hasan Baklaci,Peggy E Swanson People&Global Business Association 2004 Global Business and Finance Review Vol.9 No.2
This study examines the determinants of government borrowing costs by investigating whether government bond yields in developed and in emerging markets are driven by domestic factors, global factors, or both. The study's contributions include: (1) a new methodology to determine the relative dominance of domestic and global factors, (2) inclusion of new variables which are significant determinants of yields, and (3) analysis of commonalities and differences within and between developed and emerging markets. The findings indicate that domestic factors are dominant in the Eastern European countries, global factors are dominant in the Western European countries, and domestic and global factors are roughly equivalent in the Asian countries.
Kum, Rauf Oguzhan,Ozcan, Muge,Baklaci, Deniz,Kum, Nurcan Yurtsever,Yilmaz, Yavuz Fuat,Gungor, Volkan,Unal, Adnan Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2014 Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention Vol.15 No.17
Background: Laryngeal carcinogenesis is a multifactorial process that has not been fully elucidated. Despite extensive research, reliable markers with diagnostic and prognostic value are still lacking. It was recently reported that an elevated preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may correlate with an increased risk of recurrence, tumor aggressiveness and poorer prognosis in various malignancies. The aim of this study was to examine whether NLR could be used as an inflammatory marker to differentiate laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) patients from benign laryngeal lesion (BLL) and precancerous laryngeal lesion (PLL) patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was performed on 209 patients admitted to a tertiary referral center with laryngeal lesions and undergoing biopsies to establish their histopathological diagnosis. We reviewed the patient files for their clinical, histopathological and laboratory data. The patients were divided into three groups according to their histopathological findings, as BLL, PLL and LSCC groups. The patients in the PLL group were also divided into three subgroups as mild, moderate and severe dysplasia/carcinoma in situ (CIS) subgroups. The groups were compared for NLR and the other laboratory data. Results: The mean NLRs of the BLL, PLL and the LSCC groups were $2.12{\pm}0.86$, $2.32{\pm}0.68$ and $3.46{\pm}1.51$, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.001). The mean NLRs of the patients with PLL and LSCC were significantly higher than the patients with BLL (p=0.031 and p=0.001, respectively). The mean NLRs were similar among mild dysplasia, moderate dysplasia and severe dysplasia / CIS groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating NLR in BLL, PLL and LSCC. NLR is an inexpensive, reproducible and widely available blood test, and could be a useful inflammatory marker to differentiate LSCC from BLL and PLL.