CUSTOMER RESPONSES TO A FRONTLINE SERVICE ROBOT IN A RETAIL SERVICES CONTEXT

Amelia,Christine Mathies,Paul G. Patterson 글로벌지식마케팅경영학회 2020 Global Marketing Conference Vol.2020 No.11

Investment T rend o n Millennia ls a nd F intech F ra ud M itigation

Tifa Noer Amelia(Tifa Noer Amelia ),Andi Gazly Satrya Amal(Andi Gazly Satrya Amal ) People & Global Business Association 2024 Global Business and Finance Review Vol.29 No.2

A Structural Case for International Cooperation

( Amelia Correa ),( Romar Correa ) 세종대학교 경제통합연구소 (구 세종대학교 국제경제연구소) 2003 Journal of Economic Integration Vol.18 No.2

We recommend a Bretton Woods system along structural lines. A key component of the case is the substitution of the money transmission mechanism by the credit transmission mechanism. We suggest that the real exchange rate be the variable of cooperation between countries that are free to set interest rates to pursue domestic policy objectives.

Cost, Quality and Capacity Considerations in Group-Buying of Training Services

Amelia Carr,신호정 한국상품학회 2007 商品學硏究 Vol.25 No.4

This paper examines the practice of group-buying of educational services, known as consortium training. A theoretical and historical overview of group-buying is presented within the context of quantity discounts and network organization. A formal model is developed, adopting alternative cost components such as variable cost per trainee, fixed cost per trainee, and cost of poor quality in training. In traditional group-buying, the primary goal is to maximize the number of participating companies in order to gain economies of scale. Consortium training, however, limits the number of participants due to the inverse relationship between training quality and the number of trainees. Using the proposed model, a consortium or a company can 1) identify the optimum number of companies to join the consortium training program and 2) objectively measure the economic benefits of consortium training.

Trade and Food Security in the ASEAN

Amelia L. Bello,Mayumi Hayag D. Teves 한국무역학회 2019 한국무역학회 국제학술대회 Vol.2019 No.08

Food security is crucial in attaining sustainable and inclusive development. Goal 2 of the Sustainable Development Goals aims for Zero Hunger; Goal 3 strives for Good Health and Well‐Being while Goal 12 promotes Responsible Consumption and Production. Food security is said to exist when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life (FAO 1996). In the ASEAN community, food security remains an overriding concern because it is affected by both short and long‐term factors. Teng (2013) lists these factors: population growth, changing patterns of food consumption arising from rapid urbanization, shrinking agricultural land, declining agricultural productivity, constraints in natural resource utilization, the negative impacts of global warming and climate change on agricultural productivity and rural livelihoods, unstable prices of food prices and oil‐based chemical inputs and the rapid transformation of agricultural and food supply chains.

Visualization of Candidate Division OP3 Cocci in Limonene-Degrading Methanogenic Cultures

( Amelia Elena Rotaru ),( Regina Schauer ),( Christina Probian ),( Marc Mussmann ),( Jens Harder ) 한국미생물 · 생명공학회 2012 Journal of microbiology and biotechnology Vol.22 No.4

Members of candidate division OP3 were detected in 16S rRNA gene clone libraries from methanogenic enrichment cultures that utilized limonene as a carbon and energy source. We developed probes for the visualization of OP3 cells. In situ hybridization experiments with newly designed OP3-specific probes [OP3-565 and Eub-338(VI)] revealed abundant small OP3 cocci attached to larger cells. Syntrophic Deltaproteobacteria, OP3 cells, and methanogens affiliating with Methanoculleus and Methanosaeta formed the limonenedegrading community.

Competition and Global Competitiveness:

Amelia L. Belloa,Rolando T. Bellob,John Jasper M. Corianac 아시아무역학회 2017 Journal of Asia Trade and Business Vol.4 No.2

This paper takes a look at the experiences of Romania and the Philippines, two countries which have established a Competition Commission to promote and maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct. Competition is distinguished from competitiveness; the former is a type of market structure while the later argues that the economic competitiveness of the country is determined by the business environment. In 2016, the Philippines created the Philippine Competition Commission to promote and maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct. Meanwhile, the Romanian Competition Council which was established in 1996 enforces and ensures the application of the national and community rules on competition. The paper also explores the trend in the Global Competiveness Index for the two countries. Both countries scored best in the Basic Requirement sub-index but fared poorly in the Sophistication and Innovation Factors sub-index. For the period 2012-2017, both countries had continuously posted the highest scores for Macroeconomic Environment and Health and Primary Education. The Philippines did poorly in Infrastructure and Innovation. For Romania, the lowest scores were for Institutions and Innovation.

Organizational Forms and Agency Costs

Amelia L. Bello 한국무역연구원 2009 The International Academy of Global Business and T Vol.5 No.1

An agency relationship is found whenever one or more persons engage another person to undertake some service on his/their behalf. Positive agency theory seeks to explain patterns that characterize for instance, industrial or organizational forms and other contractual relations. The paper deals with a firm's choice of organizational form, building on agency cost arguments to explain why a certain type of organization form is observed.

BMB Reports 리뷰 소개 : in vivo 성인 신경생성을 조절하는 세포내재성 신호(Cell-intrinsic signal)에 대한 유도적 접근방식

Amelia J. Eisch 한국생화학회 2009 생화학분자생물학회 소식 Vol.29 No.2

Reproducing hybridity in Korea : Conflicting interpretations of Korean culture by South Koreans and ethnic Korean Chinese marriage migrants

Amelia L. SCHUBERT,LEE, Youngmin,LEE, Hyun-Uk 이화여자대학교 아시아여성학센터 2015 Asian Journal of Women's Studies(AJWS) Vol.21 No.3

As South Korea’s gender imbalance has grown, thousands of South Korean men have sought wives from the ethnic Korean minority in China. In this paper, we explore these women’s experiences along with South Korea’s multicultural policies, highlighting the hybrid nature of South Korean culture and challenging its hegemonic role in discourses of multiculturalism. Drawing from interviews we conducted with Korean Chinese between 2010 and 2013, we compare lived perceptions with official representations of transnational marriages. We find official representations essentialize and reify notions of ‘true’ Korean culture. We draw from Joon K. Kim’s (2011) ideas of cultural paternalism and fetishism, but argue that multiculturalism itself, not merely South Korea’s uncritical adaptation, should be reexamined. We conclude by asking how the Korean Chinese make competing claims to cultural authority within South Korean political space, and argue that they ambiguously blur the lines among the multiple cultures implicit in South Korean multiculturalism. 由于韩国男女人口比例持续失衡, 许多韩国男人开始在中国寻找朝鲜族的女人为妻。本论文将探究这些被嫁到韩国的中国朝鲜族女人的特殊经历, 同时结合对韩国文化交融政策的分析, 重点阐述韩国文化的多样性本质, 并对韩国文化在本国多元文化交融过程中所扮演的支配性地位进行讨论。根据我们从2010年到2013年间对一些韩籍朝鲜族华人的采访, 我们将这些中韩跨国夫妇对跨国婚姻的看法与韩国政府相关政策对跨国婚姻的官方解读与阐释进行了比较。我们发现韩国官方对“真正的”韩国文化的解读与阐释略显狭隘与单一。我们在对Joon K. Kim(2011)教授关于韩国文化家长主义以及推崇文化盲目崇拜的观点给予赞同的基础上, 认为不光是韩国的文化家长主义需要接受再检验, 文化多元主义本身也需要接受重新检验。在论文的最后, 我们提出了这样的疑问: 在基于韩国文化家长主义的相关政策下, 在韩国的朝鲜族华人如何才能真正的保存他们自身的文化; 同时我们认为这些在韩生活的朝鲜族华人实际上认为韩国文化本身就是一种多元文化的综合体, 而他们自己的文化只是韩国多元文化中的一个组成部, 即对他们来说不存在一个“纯粹”或“单质”的韩国文化。 한국의 성별 불균형 문제가 심화되면서 수많은 한국 남성들이 중국의 소수민족인 조선족으로부터 배우자를 찾고자 노력하고 있다. 이 연구는 이러한 조선족 결혼이주자들의 경험과 한국사회의 다문화 정책을 탐구하면서, 한국 문화의 혼종적 특성을 부각시키고 다문화주의 담론의 헤게모니적 역할이 지닌 문제점을 지적하고 있다. 2010년부터 2013년까지 진행된 인터뷰를 통해 한국정부가 국제결혼 문제를 어떻게 재현하고 있는지와 실제 결혼이주자들은 이를 어떻게 인식하고 있는지를 비교해 보았는데, 한국정부의 공식적인 재현은 ‘진정한’ 한국문화의 개념들을 본질적인 것으로 구체화하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. Joon K. Kim(2011)의 문화 온정주의와 물신주의 개념에 기대어 이를 설명할 수 있지만, 한국의 다문화주의는 다문화주의의 원리 자체가 무비판적으로 그대로 적용된 것이 아니라는 점에 유념하면서 재검토되어야 한다. 마지막으로, 이 연구는 중국 조선족이 한국정치의 다문화 관련 기관에 어떤 요구들을 하고 있는지를 살펴보면서, 그들이 한국 다문화주의의 여러 문화들 사이의 경계를 모호하게 하고 있음을 주장하고 있다.