RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        한국과 일본 대학생의 스포츠상황에 대한 도덕적 가치판단수준 비교

        함정혜(Chung Hae Hahm) 한국여성체육학회 2013 한국여성체육학회지 Vol.27 No.1

        The purpose of this study was to compare the differences of moral reasoning among general students, sports related majors students, and student athletes in Korea and Japan University. We collected total 612 out of 700 (315 from Korea, 297 from Japan) and 88 questionnaires were excluded questionnaire due to incompleteness and unreliable data. For this study, Hahm-Bellar Values Choice Inventory-16(HBVCI-16), which is a Moral Reasoning Questionnaire on Sports Activities, was used. The collected data was analyzed by t-test, one way ANOVA and two way ANOVA with using SPSS Var. 17.0 statistical package program and result were as follow. First, the Japan student`s overall score of moral reasoning were lower compare to Korean university students. Second, there were 1 % higher score of moral reasoning in woman against man and in younger subjects. Sports majored university students presented 1% higher score against other related students and higher grade students presented 5% higher score against lower grade students. Third, among student athletes of Korea and Japan, although there were no significant differences, it was 0.1% higher among those who engaged in individual sports and 5% higher score in those who have less sports career.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        놀이의 본질과 기능에 관한 연구

        함정혜(Hahm, Chung-Hee) 한국체육철학회 1996 움직임의철학 : 한국체육철학회지 Vol.4 No.1

        For several decades play has been of interest to historians. psychologists, socialogists, anthropologists, and philosophers. Huizinga who was the famous theorist of play has advanced the theory that the apparent play of many species of animals serves as evidence that play preceded culture and therefore. serves as the basis for culture. Play was seen as generating many benefits and values for human existence. As categorizing play, we classify the classical theories, recent theories, and modern theories. Each theory had the limitations especially with the classical and recent theories. The classical theories have viewed the play with an instrumental values. The recent theories concern with the actual form of the play behavior and attempt to link the antecedent and subsequent events via causes and effects. Both did not concerned with intrinsic characteristics of play. The intrinsic nature of play was well explained by Roochnik. He has expressed the fundamental nature of play as below, play stance. Play is a mode of being. It is a way of comforting oneself, a way of approaching and extending oneself to the world... it can become a stance. A stance is very much like an attitude. An attitude is a way of thinking about things: it is a mental disposition and orientation toward the world... A stance goes beyond the intellect to the body and the spirit, and becomes a mode of being-toward-the-world. The reality of play is the free activities which is essencially human need to perceive an optimal of novelty and resulting in intrinsic motivation to get personal competence. So, the basic reality of all human life is actually play. Conclusively, play is the most important in human life. To understand the reality and nature of play, we have to dig out the intrinsic and existential values of play.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        운동의 가치등급화에 관한 비판

        함정혜(Hahm, Chung Hae),김영선(Kim, Young Seon) 한국체육철학회 2002 움직임의철학 : 한국체육철학회지 Vol.10 No.2

        In our profession, we seek the values which include and promote though physical activities. The body has the characteristic that is not only value-free but also value-oriented. Values are goods: they are things that human beings find desirable. We pursue many values which related the physical activities. In on way or another all people in the field of sports science and physical education have opportunities to improve people`s lives through value pursuing. Which values are most important? What are the possibilities to make harmony such values with our real good life? This study criticized the Kretchmar`s value ranking and proposed some value-related problems. Kretchmar suggested that value of sport, dance and exercises and physical activities composed of fitness-oriented, knowledge-oriented, skill-oriented, and pleasure-oriented ones. and the values have the priorities. Also with these four values, he put the meaning with intrinsic and extrinsic values. He tried ranking the intrinsic values which give priority to pleasure and skill oriented ones, and the extrinsic values to fitness-oriented one. But the problems were, first of all, the sport values could not be ranked because the values originated in the holistic human being. Second, the relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic values could not be distinguished clearly and well-defined. Third, the intrinsic value were reversed with the extrinsic value. We thought that both values were important, but the meaning of intrinsic and extrinsic values should be definitely identified and recognized for our good life.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        체육 스포츠 사회체육의 개념에 관한 고찰

        함정혜(Hahm Chung Hae) 한국여성체육학회 1996 한국여성체육학회지 Vol.10 No.-

        The studies on the concepts and definitions of the physical education, sport, and sport & leisure science have been on-going process for a long time. But there were no concrete consensus for these concepts. The physical education which had been considered physical training, gymnastics, physical activity, or sports began to set its concept in the nineties. The term of the physical education was defined as `education of the physical` or education through the physical` emphasizing educational aspect. In spite of its relation to education, the focus of physical education have been changed into `human movement` which started to make the physical education develop itself from the viewpoint of human movement. Also the physical education strived to find its own independent way in the academic disciplines getting out of the subordinate field of education. Recently, with the introduction of the concept of somatics, men`s physical activities including sports become the subjects of the academic studies. and described men`s lived movements. With the same ideas, sports were merely no longer strict and formal physical activities or athletics,. Sport, in the broad sense, shcoud be viewed the cultural phenormena in the societal field which pursued human beings` mental, emotional, as well as physical developments. In the middle of 1990`s sport & leisure science had been started to develop the human being`s health, and welfare for the future. To begin with sport & leisure science have been called as the `sport for all$quot; that was a kind of campaign or movement in the foreign countries. Now the sport & leisure science contributed on the publics` physical activities, their health improvement, and life time sports for the public welfare in order to improve the quality of life. In this study I descrived the concepts and definitions of physical education, sport, and sport & leisure science in order to understand the meaning of these realities, and pointed out the questions involved in our academic fields. In my opinion, physical education, sports, and sport & leisure science were steemed from one root. That meant all of these studied the humans` lived movement although each had its own methodology and objectives.

      • KCI등재

        여가의 생활신학적 고찰

        함정혜(Chung Hae Hahm) 한국여성체육학회 2000 한국여성체육학회지 Vol.14 No.1

        The purposes of this study were to identify the concepts of the leisure as the modern and traditional aspects, and to realize what the leisure should be for the well-being life in the theological aspect. The modern concepts of leisure recognized as the free time, free spirit, and spontaneous activities. The traditional concept of leisure that Aristotles mentioned was the touching with God for the purification of our mind and body. These both concepts were related with the thological meaning. The impotant points were that the meaning of leisure was more than the pleasure and amusements, not the escape from the ordinary life, and not simply activities. Also the word of leisure was not contrsat with the word of work, the implication of two words had mutual relations in our life. The core concept of leisure was discoverd in the theology of everyday life. The theology of everyday life was one of practical theology. The theory of the theology of everyday life treat how the human beings could live as the Christian. For instance, we could think our acts or behaviors whether these theologically were right in some aspect before we decided. The leisure was also practically used as right direction for our life. The leisure was the vital parts of our life and the expression of our life styles. The meaning of leisure shoud be re-recognized as the mode of life and synthetical approach to life of well-being.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼