질의 응답 Q&A - 최근 큰 이슈가 되고 있는 $CO_2$의 처리에 대하여 알고 싶습니다

채광석,Chae, Gwang-Seok (사)한국토질및기초기술사회 2009 지반과 기술 Vol.6 No.4

영양-비타민과 광물질이 돼지에 미치는 영향

채광석,Chae, Gwang-Seok 대한양돈협회 1986 養豚 Vol.8 No.7

농지 거래 행태조사와 제도 개선 방안

채광석(Chae Gwang-seok),김홍상(Kim Hong-sang) 한국농촌경제연구원 2014 한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

농지 총량 관리에 관한 연구

채광석(Gwang-seok Chae),김홍상(Hongsang Kim) 한국농촌경제연구원 2011 한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

Although there is a reasonable system for preservation of farmland, the operation of the system has the characteristic of focusing on controlling the non-agricultural supply of farmland to secure farmland in terms of size. The farmland classified as ‘superior’ is still conversed in large scale and there are many unplanned developments. Farmland conversion is initiated by the local government, but the local government’s concept and objective of farmland preservation are not clearly defined, and farmland management on an aggregate basis becomes difficult. In preserving and managing farmland, problems arise not because of an erroneous design of the farmland management system but because of the invariable perception of changing circumstances. Although the current system aims to preserve farmland centering around ‘superior’ farmland within an agriculture promotion area(conservation area), there is a limitation in that the concept as to what is the appropriate level of preservation is not properly established. This research reviewed changes in the total amount of farmland and the actual state of management, derived differences and implications concerning domestic and overseas farmland preservation and management through a survey of cases in major advanced countries, and analyzed the demand outlook and the possibility of introducing a management system on an aggregate basis from technical, systematic, financial and legal aspects. The major findings of this research are as follows: First, the current size of the ‘agricultural promotion area,’ which can be categorized as the farmland for preservation, is 810,000ha out of the total farmland, and we should accomplish the target rate of food self-sufficiency with the agricultural promotion area only. Therefore, in order to implement a new policy objective, we need to prepare a method of securing farmland on a total amount basis and prepare a legal and systematic action plan. Second, we need to understand farmland management as a concept which includes investment and financing for efficient use of farmland beyond the scope of management of ownership and use (lease and rent). When such a legal system and change in the perception are complete, the effectiveness of the plan for farmland use will be improved. Third, up until now a control-oriented preservation policy has constituted the main pillar of farmland preservation in our country. But in order to accomplish the crucial national objective of securing food when there is continuous pressure to convert farmland and mitigate regulations, preserving farmland through incentives should be contemplated. For example, adopting a taxation system providing tax benefits to those who participate in farmland preservation projects should be considered positively.

농지상속 실태와 정책 과제

채광석(Gwang-Seok Chae),박석두(Seok-Doo Park) 한국농촌경제연구원 2012 한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

Background of Research This study focuses on investigating the actual state of farmland inheritance and presenting desirable improvement methods in the aspect of sustainable agricultural management. This study is to find out the methods for stable management succession by inheritors or other farmers in the aspect of agricultural structure policy. Therefore, the main contents of this study include the problems, tasks, and methods of farmland inheritance for sustainable agricultural management. Method of Research In order to provide the improvement methods, the following steps are to be taken: 1) identify the actual state of farmland inheritance (in case of professional farmers versus general farmers and inheritors) 2) analyze its influence to agricultural management 3) derive tax matters related to it, and 4) provide the system for it, which supports successive farmers to be its beneficiaries and leads the people who are not farmers to use their inherited farmland with maximized efficiencies, and make policy improvements Research Results and Implications The main contents of this paper are described in four chapters as follows: In Chapter 2, we figure out the farmland inheritance system and its problems by reviewing the related laws. Then, we review the inheritance related systems, such as the Family Business Inheritance Support System and the Agricultural Management Inheritance Support System. In Chapter 3, we discuss the actual state of farmland inheritance and farmer succession, and also their problems. At first, by using the data from the nationwide statistics, the trend of farmland inheritance and the actual state of farmer succession are reviewed. Especially in regard to farmer succession, the factors influencing the selection of major inheritors are analyzed. Then, through a survey, the actual state of specific agricultural inheritance, inheritance intentions, etc. are identified. In Chapter 4, we also discuss the case studies related to farmland inheritance in other countries. At first, agricultural inheritance laws in Germany, Japan and France are examined. The German system does not recognize division of farmland inheritance among sibling inheritors but recognizes the inheritance by only one sibling among them. In contrast, the Japanese and French systems are for the equal division of inheritance. Regarding the inheritance support system, we review case studies in the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and Japan. Chapter 5 is for the farmland inheritance system and its policy improvement methods, including the vision, direction, and tasks for fulfilling sustainable agricultural management. The policy methods are, in large part, divided into two: the one which supports agricultural inheritance of successive farmers and the other which leads people who are not engaged in agriculture to maximize efficiencies of their inherited farmland.

농지전용의 원인과 영향에 관한 연구

박석두(Seok-Doo Park),채광석(Gwang-Seok Chae) 한국농촌경제연구원 2013 한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

농업경영체 등록정보를 활용한 농업직불제 소득효과 분석

한석호(Suk-Ho Han),채광석(Gwang-Seok Chae) 한국산학기술학회 2016 한국산학기술학회논문지 Vol.17 No.5

정부는 시장개방에 따른 농가의 경영불안정을 완화하고 농가소득보전을 위해 다양한 형태의 직접지불제를 운용하고 있다. 그러나 농업부문의 직불제는 농업정책의 중심으로 농가소득 안정화의 중요한 역할을 수행하는 핵심적인 정책수단으로 자리잡고 많은 예산이 지출됨에도 불구하고 직불금 수급실태와 소득안정기여도 등 정책효과에 대한 분석이 미흡한 실정이다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 농식품부의 2014년과 2015년의 농업경영체 D.B.를 이용하여 직불금 농가단위 실태분석, 시사점을 도 출하고, 제도의 성과평가를 시도하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 평균 거시지표를 활용한 농업분석 등 기존의 연구 틀에서 벗어 나, 경영체 DB를 활용하여 농가단위 제도의 성과평가를 시도하고 시사점을 도출한 것이 특징이라 할 수 있다. 직불금 수급실 태와 성과평가를 시도한 결과, 직불금 수급액 분포가 정상분포곡선보다 왼쪽으로 많이 치우친 것을 알 수 있었다. 2014년 농업경영체DB에 의하면 전체 농업경영체의 약 절반 수준인 49.3%의 농가가 연간 10만 원도 안 되는 직불금을 수령하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 영농규모가 클수록 소득증대효과와 소득안정화효과 모두 크게 나타났는데, 이는 면적에 비례해서 직 불금이 높았기 때문이다. 고령농업경영체일수록 직불금에 의한 농가소득 기여도가 높게 나타난 점은 장점으로 평가되나, 영 농규모가 0.5ha미만의 소규모 농가의 직불금의 농가소득 기여도가 3% 수준에 불과한 반면, 10ha이상의 대규모 농가의 직불 금 농가소득 기여도가 29.4%로 높게 분석되었다. 대규모 농가는 소규모 농가보다 농업소득은 10배 차이인데, 직불금 수급액 은 110배를 더 받는 것으로 분석되어, 향후 직불제도 정책개선 및 수정이 요구된다. The government has run and managed various forms of direct payment systems, such as the paddy and field direct payment, to ease the instability of farm incomes with respect to market opening, and preserve farm income. Direct payments to the agricultural sector is a center in the key policy instrument that plays an important role in income stabilization. Despite the large amount of spending in the farm unit, the status of direct payment, and policy effects the analysis of direct payments, such as stability of income contribution, are insufficient. This paper, using the farm unit DB in 2014 and 2015, performed farm level analysis of direct payment, and derived the implications of the performance evaluation system. As a result, the distribution of direct payment showed considerable bias to the left side compared to the normal distribution curve. Approximately half of the farms (49.3%) in 2014 DB should receive below 100,000 won per year by a direct payment. A larger-scale farm showed a significantly increased income effect and income stabilizing effect because direct payments make higher contributions to farm income in proportional to the area. In the more elderly farmers, a high contribution by direct payment to farm income was found to be an advantage; however, in small-scale farms of less than 0.5ha, direct payment contribution on farm household income was only 3%. In large-scale farms, 10ha or more, the contribution to farm income were found to be 29.4%. The income of large farms was 10 times larger than small farmers, and the direct payment entitlements that were received were 110 times larger. Through this policy, direct payments are required for future improvements and modifications.

밭농업 기반정비 확충 방안

김홍상(Kim Hong-sang),채광석(Chae Gwang-seok) 한국농촌경제연구원 2014 한국농촌경제연구원 정책연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

This study aims to examine the current state of dry-field farming infrastructure improvement in changes in the upland farming environment including horticultural crops and fruit with the recent Korea-China FTA talks, and to draw plans to improve the infrastructure of dry-field farming poorer than that of paddy farming. This study covers both fields and paddies for measures to expand the improvement of the upland farming infrastructure. First, the concept of dry-field farming and the significance of its infrastructure improvement are examined. Second, the present state and tasks of upland farming are investigated. Third, the actual condition and tasks of dry-field farming infrastructure improvement are examined, and the ways to supplement the improvement are presented. Fourth, policy tasks for effective reorganization of the infrastructure are presented. We examine dry-field farming infrastructure improvement for fields and paddies, and present alternatives such as expanding the Dry-field Farming Infrastructure Improvement Project’s target, enhancing the project’s level, implementing projects centered on main producing areas, upgrading the budget support system, and reforming the system of coordinating land use and organizing to supplement upland infrastructures early. To expand the project’s target beyond the standard of the grouped area size (that was relaxed from over 30ha to over 10ha), it is needed to increase the target areas more actively, and to develop proper types of the project through organizing by region. Basically, regional differentiation including simple and complex improvement should be sought. However, it is necessary to strengthen and develop the project’s key contents such as paving access roads, readjusting farmland, and developing water. The project should focus on main producing areas. Nevertheless, in consideration of cities and counties without the designation of main producing areas, it is needed to establish the Development Plan for Agriculture, Rural Villages and the Food Industry by city and county, and each region needs to plan and deliberate whether to implement projects including the designation of main producing areas by city and county and of the Dry-field Farming Infrastructure Improvement Project’s target area. As for the reorganization of the project’s budget support system from the Regional Development Special Account to the Agriculture & Fisheries Structure Adjustment Special Account (Agriculture Special Account), the following ways can be considered: implementing existing projects with the Regional Development Special Account and new projects with the budget support system of the Agriculture Special Account in the areas selected by the central government; conducting only field infrastructure improvement centered on main producing areas with the budget support system of the Agriculture Special Account; implementing only projects in areas possible of field readjustment with the Agriculture Special Account’s budget support system; and implementing projects in grouped areas above a certain size (e.g. grouped areas over 10ha: Agriculture Special Account; grouped areas under 10ha: Regional Development Special Account) with the budget support system of the Agriculture Special Account. The policy tasks for efficient upland farming infrastructure improvement are as follows. First, it is needed to promote strategies for projects centered on main producing areas and organization for regional differentiation. Second, projects’ priorities and proper size should be decided. Third, it is necessary to secure stable finance and to improve the budget support system. Fourth, a resources survey and demonstration projects are needed. Finally, it is necessary to upgrade the farmland management systems centered on the land category of paddies and the adjustment of land use.

농작물재해보험의 성과와 정책과제

최경환(Kyeong-Hwan Choi),채광석(Gwang-seok Chae),윤병석(Byeong-Seok Yoon) 한국농촌경제연구원 2010 한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

농업보조금 개편 방안 연구

박성재(Seong-jae Park),박준기(Joon-kee Park),송주호(Ju-ho Song),채광석(Gwang-seok Chae),문한필(Han-pil Moon) 한국농촌경제연구원 2011 한국농촌경제연구원 정책연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

This study is aimed to suggest how to improve performance and efficiency of government subsidy programs for agricultural sector. More specifically, it is designed to address followings: First, general definition of agricultural support and the classified catalogue of WTO domestic support are reviewed. Second, the current status of agricultural support is examined and a direction of its reform is proposed. Third, an appropriate size of agricultural support is considered. Finally, it suggests ways to revamp direct payments, individual subsidy programs, and the management system of implementing agricultural support, which are major issues in the agricultrual support reform. Agricultural subsidies have brought about a set of positive effects on competitiveness, SOC, R&D, and restructuring in the sector, even though too many subsidy programs, each having different goal and target and inefficiency of their implementation have been pinpointed as shortcomings. However, agricultural subsidies have also produced some adverse effects on the sector. First, they have spurred dependence on government aids and weaken farmers’ ability to stand on their own. Second, problems associated with direct payment are pointed out, including its concentration on rice and paddy field, overproduction of rice, a lack of incentive for upland field corps which are in short of production. Third, the projects as FTA countermeasures have so high portion of support, 74.4% that much concern is being voiced about deepening dependence on government and excess demand for the pojects. Fourth, there exist inefficient factors in the management system of budget and fund. Finally, government-oriented fiscal funds would stand in the way of private investment in agriculture. This study focuses on the reforms of direct payments, individual subsidy programs, and their implementing system. The principle of the reforms is based on the consensus from the ’Committee of Advanced Agriculture and Fishery(2009.07)’. Each subsidy program is reconsidered to determine whether it should be abolished, be integrated with other program, be changed to loan program, or be adjusted with lower share of support, and so on. In this stage, the reform of agricultural direct payments would be conducted focusing on the modification of rice direct payment. In order to mitigate overproduction of rice, the variable payment needs to be coupled with production costs. The newly discussed public-service direct payment is not widely shared opinions yet and would be difficult in securing enough fund for implementation. However, in the near future when further opening of domestic agriculture starts to lower profitability of upland crops, a comprehensive reform of agricultural direct payments will be required.