주민주도형 아파트 커뮤니티 사업의 활성화 방안 - 서울시 아파트 커뮤니티 활성화 공모사업을 중심으로 -

지은영,천현숙,은난순,채혜원,Jee, Eun-Young,Chun, Hyeon-Sook,Eun, Nan-Soon,Che, Hye-Won 한국주거학회 2014 한국주거학회 논문집 Vol.25 No.5

This study aims to understand the current state of a community project in Seoul and to determine a revitalization plan for community projects of inhabitants initiative. Regarding the research methods, 10 apartments that participated in this activation project in Seoul were selected, 31 residents who participated in community activities were surveyed, and 20 community planners in Seoul were surveyed. The results indicate that community leaders are the most important factor in community programs. community leaders must be able to promote participation and a spirit of service; they must also be capable of managing and implementing programs. To ensure that local community resources are utilized and integrated, it was shown that consultation and human resources are of the highest necessity. Moreover, regarding community education, it was shown that for providing general opportunities and means by which community activities may be implemented, program information and space applications are crucial. Furthermore, financial support and support for public relations activities from the government are necessary. To activate apartment communities, first, community education programs for residents must be provided. Second, a system that facilitates access to and sharing of resources from areas outside the community must be established. Third, financial support should be consistent to support community activities. Finally, the promotion of community vitalization at the government level is necessary.

논문편 : 연령계층별 노인주거환경에 대한 선호도 비교

지은영,고정자 ( Eun Young Jee,Jung Ja Ko ) 대한가정학회 1997 Family and Environment Research Vol.35 No.2

주거복지지표 개발에 관한 연구 II - 수요자 측면의 주거복지체감지표와 지수를 중심으로 -

지은영,은난순,홍형옥,Jee, Eun-Young,Eun, Nan-Soon,Hong, Hyung-Ock 한국주거학회 2008 한국주거학회 논문집 Vol.19 No.5

The aim of this research is to develop the sentiment indicators of housing welfare for evaluating housing welfare policies conducted by the Korean government. The methods of this research are used by analysis of related documents, FGI (Focus Group Interview), and survey. The survey was made by experts and consumers. To analyze the survey, this research also uses confirmatory factor analysis by SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science) program, AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) by Expert Choice program, frequency, average, percentages, Factor analysis etc. As a result of this research, selected housing welfare indicators are settled as follows: In the housing welfare aspect, 11 indicators in the department of 'Housing Satisfaction' and 11 indicators in the department of 'Community Satisfaction' (22 in total) are suggested. The indicators are 1) Water Supply and Distribution Equipment 2) Heating equipment 3) the size of the exclusive residential area 4) the number of rooms 5) Ventilation and Lighting 6) Sound Insulation (Indoor Noise) 7) Air Pollution/Odor 8) House Deposit 9) Rent Paid 10) Maintenance (Dwelling) Cost 11) The length of Occupation 12) Proximity to Welfare Facilities 13) Educational Environment 14) Convenience of Facilities (shops, hospitals etc.) 15) Convenience of Transportation and Commuting 16) Distance from Workplace 17) Landscape and Green Space (Tree, Flowers, Grass etc.) 18) Vandalism (Destruction Behavior, graffiti etc.) 19) Privacy 20) Noise in Public Places (Drinking, Loudly Talking etc.) 21) Safety from Crime 22) Safety from a Disaster. As of 2007, the housing welfare sentiment index is measured by the survey of 1,000 inhabitants in the public housing, which shows 3.51.

주거복지상담 현장의 실태분석과 활성화 방안

지은영,Jee, Eun-Young 한국주거학회 2015 한국주거학회 논문집 Vol.26 No.6

This study is based on a survey of welfare counselling services provision, including best practice, current issues and suggestions for ways to improve housing welfare. For this study, 20 facilities providing housing welfare consulting and 26 people actually doing the consulting at those facilities were surveyed. The high-level findings of this study include: 1. Lower level local governments should be the frontline in providing housing welfare consulting services as they have the capability to provide greater accessibility to such services for those in need and deliver sustainable housing welfare benefits responsibly; 2. Housing welfare consulting has a wide scope and requires a high level of expertise. For this reason, the Counseling Service Providers have a great need for field training and capacity building. In this regard, certified housing welfare professionals may offer a viable solution. 3. In terms of best practice, the qualities required for Consulting Service Providers include professional knowledge, communication skills, understanding of those seeking Consulting, and the capability to check the progress in consulting and follow up.

찾아가는 마이홈센터 주거복지사의 전문직 인식

지은영(Eun-Young Jee),채혜원(Hye-won Chae) 한국주거학회 2024 한국주거학회 논문집 Vol.35 No.1

The purpose of this study is to understand the professional recognition for Housing welfare professional who works at ‘On-site myhome center’. Professional Recognition consisted of ‘professional identity’ level, ‘theory and knowledge’ level, and ‘job performance skill’ level. The research process consists of three parts. Firstly, the direction of professional identity was set up by literature review related housing welfare and field survey. Second, analysing of professional identity were developed and revised through focus group interview (FGI), and questionnaire survey on 6 experts in housing welfare area. Third, questionnaire survey from 13 Housing welfare professional in On-site myhome center was performed in order to analyze the level of the professional recognition. As a result of this research, selected professional identity were settled as followed : the professional identity for Housing welfare professional consisted of 5 components, 30 items. The level of theory & knowledge and job performance skills recognized by Housing welfare professional when performing their duties was very high. The professional identity of Housing welfare professional was very high in ‘belief in public services’. In particular, the knowledge of ‘Understanding housing welfare recipient’ and ‘Residential organizations and management’ was very high. The level of description for ‘Finding community resources’, ‘Networking and cooperation with local communities’, and ‘Proficiency in community space’ was high.

코로나19 상황을 반영한 중년의 주의식과 주거 내 활동 특성

지은영(Jee, Eunyoung),이현정(Lee, Hyun-Jeong) 한국생활과학회 2021 한국생활과학회지 Vol.30 No.5

노인주거 연구의 접근방법과 쟁점

지은영(Jee Eun-Young),홍형옥(Hong Hyung-Ock) 가정과삶의질학회 2002 가정과삶의질연구 Vol.20 No.5

영구임대주택 ‘찾아가는 마이홈센터’의 지역사회 연계실태와 활성화 방안

지은영(Eunyoung Jee) 충북대학교 생활과학연구소 2023 생활과학연구논총 Vol.27 No.3

Background/Objectives: The purpose of this study is to understand the actual condition of community resources network m the “On-site Myhome Center” and propose a revitalization plan to increase the efficiency of supporting Housing welfare services with the limited resources and manpower of the center. Methods: The subjects of this study were 14 Housing welfare Professionals placed in the “On-site Myhome Center” of Permanent Public rental housing. It was surveyed as a questionnaire composed of open questions. Results: Each of the 14 “On-site Myhome Center” subject to this survey is carrying out specialized projects tailored to tenants. It provides continuous and integrated Housing welfare services by deriving optimal resources through organic links with private organizations and public institutions in the local community. Among the tasks of the “On- site Myhome Center” Housing welfare Professionals, most of them recognize the community resources network as important tasks within the third priority, including four who answered that their importance is the first priority. Conclusion/Implications: For the efficient community resource linkage work of the “On-site Myhome Center”, it is an urgent priority to recruit personnel who are qualified as Housing welfare Professional, not assistants. The lack of space m the “On-site Myhome Center” is also related to the center's internal and external status, so an independent space should be secured and a space for meetings with related organizations should be secured. It is necessary to actively promote the work of “On-site Myhome Center” at home and abroad, and to strengthen specialized projects that do not overlap with those of local social welfare centers or management offices.

청년 1인 가구의 주거복지를 위한 쉐어하우스 거주 실태와 요구도: 입주자와 잠재 수요자 대학생을 중심으로

지은영 ( Eun Young Jee ) 대한가정학회 2016 Human Ecology Research(HER) Vol.54 No.6

The study finds a constructive way to improve shared houses by analyzing shared house living conditions, satisfaction of the residents and potential consumer`s needs. For this, a survey of 179 single-person university residents and interviews with seven young adults residing in shared house was conducted. The results showed that shared house tenants had high satisfaction in regard to bedrooms, common spaces, and rental costs. They successfully adapted to community life by frequently using the living, dining spaces, and common spaces with respect and consideration towards other tenants by following rules. Single-person university household should prefer single rooms and the biggest consideration when they move into a shared house is rent. Affordable rates were 300,000 to 350,000 Korean Won per month (40.5%) and deposit of 3 million won or less (64.3%). Results also showed a need for a professional manager residing in the house with a cleaning service for common spaces and a want to share hobbies with other tenants (3.25/5 point scale). It is very important in a housing welfare perspective that one experiences the value of living and emotional sharing to heighten the satisfaction through shared houses. It is essential to put effort into developing a service that reflects consumer`s needs for shared houses to continue as a housing alternative model for young adults.

서울시 ‘아파트 커뮤니티 활성화 사업’에 대한 입주자의 평가 및 개선방안

지은영(Eun-Young Jee) 가정과삶의질학회 2016 가정과삶의질연구 Vol.34 No.4