首里方言のTAMについて : 狀態性述語を中心に

정상철 ( Sang Cheol Jung ) 한국일어일문학회 2006 日語日文學硏究 Vol.59 No.1

강조용법의 「ノダ」문에 관한 연구 : 하위타입과 문법적인 특징을 중심으로

정상철(Jung Sang Cheol) 韓國外國語大學校 外國學綜合硏究센터 日本硏究所 2015 日本硏究 Vol.0 No.64

본고에서는 강조용법의 「ノダ」문을 대상으로 하여 시간적한정성과 임의성, 설명의 구조, 이중판단, 접속조사 등의 관점에서 고찰한 것이다. 그 결과를 요약해서 정리하자면 다음과 같다. 첫 번째로 강조용법의 「ノダ」문을 크게 2분류했다. 즉 설명구조적인 강조인가, 비설명구조적인 강조용법인가이다. 이들 중 후자의 경우가 강조용법의 「ノダ」문의 대표적인 용법으로 생각되는데 중요한 하위 타입으로는 전경적인 사건의 강조인가 배경적인 사건의 강조인가 하는 점이다. 한편 전자의 경우는 이유설명, 전체보충설명, 부분보충설명을 강조하는 하위용법이 있다. 두 번째로는 강조용법의 「ノダ」문의 문법적인 특징에 관한 것이다.즉 설명의 「ノダ」문과 달리 강조용법의 「ノダ」문은 1)기본적으로 설명구조 밖에서 「ノダ」가 나타나고, 2)단문레벨의 인식적인 판단만을 나타내며, 3)「どころが、しかも、まして」 등의 접속사가 많이 보이고, 4)계기적인 관계에서는 동사술어문의 완성상 형식을 사용하여 전경(foreground)적인 사건을 강조하게 되고, 한편 동시적인 관계의 경우에는 주로 계속상 형식으로 배경(background)적인 사건을 강조한다. This paper proposes that the emphasis "Noda" statement in Japanese(KATARI), was discussed from the viewpoint of semantic-grammatical features and temporal localization. The main issues are as follows. First of all, I suggest that there are two type of "Noda" statement which one is the explanative structure and the other is the non-explanative structure. The former, moreover divided causal explanation sentence into noncausal-explanation sentence as its sub-type. The latter that typical uses of the emphasis "Noda", presents not only the information of foreground of the sentences that marks the perfective forms but also the information background that used the imperfective forms, on the other hand. Finally, basically the emphasis "Noda" statement has the semantic-grammatical features that 1)reveals non-explanative structures, 2)has a epistemic modality of the one sentence level, 3)co-occurs discourse markers (DOKOROGA, SIKAMO, MASITE), 4)The perfective forms functions NARRATIO and the imperfective forms DESCRIPTIO in narrative discourse, respectively.

反語文の情報構造について

鄭相哲(Jung Sang Cheol) 일본어문학회 2017 일본어문학 Vol.76 No.-

本稿は韓·日語の対照的な観点から反語文の情報構造について考察したものである。その主な結果は次の通りである。 まず、典型的な反語文では有題文から無題文へ情報構造の置換が行われ、<全体焦点化>で強調的な効果をもたらす。しかし、非典型的な反語文では通常の疑問文的な側面をも保持しているので、<全体焦点化>が必ずしも義務的ではない。 次に、韓国語では同語反復による「떨긴 누가 떨어」「춥긴 뭐가 추워」などのような構文的なパタンとして反語文が認められるものがある。この場合は<全体焦点化>が行われず、文法的な条件が優先される。 最後に、韓国語で<全体焦点化>が行われないもう一つの場合は一種のとりたて表現である「야(ya)」が用いられる場合である。この構文では「야(ya)」の前の部分である旧情報の主題をとりたてるので、結果的には<全体焦点化>された反語文と同様な働きをするように考えられる。 The present article explores the information structure of rhetorical questions in Korean-Japanese comparative perspective. Our main results are summed up as follows. Firstly, in typical instances of rhetorical questions, the information structure of thematic sentence is converted into the information structure of non-thematic sentence, with the effect of engendering “sentential focus.” On the other hand, in non-typical instances of rhetorical questions where a standard interrogative meaning still somehow persists, “sentential focus” does not necessarily emerge. Secondly, Korean possesses a constructional type of rhetorical question that involves tautologies such as “떨긴누가떨어” and “춥긴뭐가추워.” In these cases, “sentential focus” does not arise, and grammatical conditions are operative on a preferential basis. Finally, Korean displays another case in which “sentential focus” is absent, namely sentences involving a type of focus particle, ya (야). In this construction, we contend that ya puts into focus its preceding element which expresses a topic or old information and as a result, the information structure of this construction is tantamount to the information structure of rhetorical questions with “sentential focus.”

韓ㆍ臺 벤처기업의 e-비즈니스 발전단계별 성공요인

문희철(Hee-cheol Moon),정상철(Sang-Chul Jung),황경연(Kyung-yun Hwang),오세구(Se-Gu Oh) 한국인터넷전자상거래학회 2007 인터넷전자상거래연구 Vol.7 No.2

This article reports the results of a study investigating critical success factors for the development stage of e-business in venture firms in Korea and Taiwan. For Daedeok Valley Venture Firms, there were statistical significance found in the top management support factor, ability of organizational learning factor. It resource factor and competitor orientation factor according to the development stage of e-business. However, for in Hsinchu Science Park Venture Firms, there were not statistical significance found in the top management support factor, ability of organizational learning factor, customer orientation factor and competitor orientation factor according to the development stage of e-business.

同時タクシス連体節の時間性について : 韓国語との対照を中心に

정상철(Jung, Sang-Cheol)(鄭相哲) 일본어문학회 2019 일본어문학 Vol.87 No.-

本論文は韓国語と日本語の同時的な時間関係を表わす連体節のテンス·アスペクトを対象としたものである。時間的限定性、タクシス、動詞タイプなどの観点から考察し、その主な内容としては、大きく次の二点にまとめられる。 第1点目は、連体節のテンス·アスペクトの意味を実現する文法的な条件とその順序である。つまり、1)時間的限定性の有無、2)タクシス(継起関係か同時関係か)、3)主節テンス(未来/現在/過去)、4)連体節の述語タイプ(内的限界動詞かどうか)である。この順序は非常に厳格であり、相互交替は不可能である。 第2点目は韓国語の「던(ten)」の使用条件と意味についてである。まず、基本的に同時的なタクシスで連体節の述語が文法的に限界づけられていない(unbounded)場合は義務的であり、限界づけられると任意的になる。また、継起性やアスペクトを表わす場合はなじみにくい。次は「던」の文法的な意味としては、時間名詞のようにはたらき連体節を絶対テンス化し、話し手の目撃性を表わすものと考えられる。 In this article, we deal with tense and aspect of ad-nominal clauses which express simultaneity taxis in Korean and Japanese. Our analysis is based on the notions of temporal localization, taxis, and verb types, and its core results are twofold as follows. Firstly, our primary finding is concerned with grammatical conditions and their order which are relevant to the realization of temporal and aspectual meanings of ad-nominal clauses. That is, (i) the presence/absence of temporal localization, (ii) taxis (temporally sequential relation, simultaneity), (iii) tense of a matrix clause (future, present, past), and (iv) the types of predicate in an ad-nominal clause (telic, atelic). This order is strict and cannot be overridden. Secondly, another central outcome of our study pertains to the conditions on the use of 던 (ten) and its grammatical meaning. The use of this grammatical item is obligatory when the predicate of an ad-nominal clause is grammatically unbounded due to simultaneity taxis; otherwise, it is optional. Moreover, the use of the grammatical item is not natural when simultaneity or aspect is expressed. As for the grammatical meaning of 던 (ten), it behaves like a temporal noun, as a result of which the ad-nominal clause has absolute tense, and the speaker’s evidentiality is expressed.

いわゆる命令の「のだ」について

정상철(Jung, Sang-Cheol) 일본어문학회 2021 일본어문학 Vol.94 No.-

本稿では話し合い文で見られる、いわゆる命令的な｢のだ｣を対象とし、その文法的な意味と特徴について考察したものである。その主な論点を整理すると、次のようになる。 第1点目は命令的な｢のだ｣は<説明の構造>から考えると、記述文が不在する。したがって、<感嘆>などの用法と同様に<説明の構造>から離れ、｢のだ｣が説明という機能を失い、命令に近い働きをするようになるのである。 第2点目は命令的な｢のだ｣の文法的な特徴として次のような点を指摘した。 1)談話構造の移行(説明から命令) 2)よびかけ語(オイ、サア)との共起 3)文法化 第3点目は命令形による命令文と命令的な｢のだ｣文との異同について考察した。つまり、両者は共に命令的に機能するものの、後者は前者と違い、先行文との関連性、終助詞の種類、非典型的な命令用法の不在などの観点から違いもある、という点について指摘した。 In this paper, the grammatical meaning and characteristics of the so- called imperative NODA appearing in dialogue were examined. The summary of the main discussion is as follows. First of all, from the perspective of <structure of explanation>, the imperative NODA deviates from <structure of explanation> as in the use of <exclamation> in that NODA lost the function of explanation and acquired a new function comparable to the imperative function. Second, it was pointed out that the use of the imperative NODA has the following grammatical characteristics. 1) implementation of the discourse structure (from “explanation” to “command”), 2) co-occurrence with vocative case (oi, saa), 3) grammaticalization Third, the differences between the imperative statement and the imperative NODA were considered. In other words, though both of them realize the imperative meaning, they display several differences pertaining to relevance to the preceding sentence, the types of co-occurring final particles, the atypical imperative usage, and so forth. However, there are many issues that have not been discussed here. In particular, among the atypical usages of NODA shown in dialogue, we could not mention the use of NODA that realizes the meaning of “admiration” and “emphasis”. These topics are left for future work.

YORON方言の時相法体系についての研究 -言語類型論の観点から

鄭相哲(jung Sang-cheol) 한국외국어대학교 일본연구소 2007 日本硏究 Vol.34 No.-

SUC2 Gene 을 갖는 재조합 Saccharomyces cerebisiae 의 Invertase 발현특성

정상철(Sang - Cheol Jung),장재권(Jae - Kweon Jang),김인규(In - Gyu Kim),변유량(Yu - Ryang Pyun) 한국미생물생명공학회 1989 한국미생물·생명공학회지 Vol.17 No.3

일본어 「シテイル」의 연구사

정상철(鄭相哲)(Jung, Sang-Cheol) 일본어문학회 2012 일본어문학 Vol.56 No.-

本稿はアスペクトの有標形式であるシテイルの研究史を概観したものである。その研究史を大局的観点から要素主義、体系主義、体系․機能主義、類型論的な段階に分け、それぞれの段階の特徴について調べた。 まず要素主義の段階の特徴としては語彙的な意味と文法的な意味との相関性の究明、シテイルの多様な用法の追求を指摘した。次の体系主義の段階ではテンス․アスペクト範疇の整備、アスペクトの定義、シテイルの優位性について考察した。次の体系·機能主義の段階ではperfect相、反復·習慣相、タクシス、aspectとaspectualityなどを特徴として指摘した。最 後の類型論的な段階ではTAM観点の有効性と日本方言におけるシテイルの研究を紹介した。つまり、日本方言を大きく西日本型と東北型と沖縄型に分け、順に3項対立型、客体ムード型、主体ムード型といった特徴があることを指摘した。 このような結果はほかの文法範疇の研究や韓国語研究への応用など、今後の研究に役立つものと思われる。

심포지엄 : 언어유형론과 개별언어연구 -일본어의 상을 중심으로-

정상철 ( Sang Cheol Jung ) 한국일어일문학회 2015 日語日文學硏究 Vol.94 No.1

本稿は言語類型論の觀点から他言語との對照を通じ、日本語のアスペクトの特徵について論じたものである。 まずロシア語との對照から日本語の完成相が無標形式である事實が言語普遍的ではないことを確認した。次にロマンス諸語との對照を通じ、2項對立體系である日本語の方が類型論的には少數であり、アスペクトは過去表現において顯著であることが明らかになった。さらに、形態論的なテンスを持たない言語から完成相形式が過去と、繼續相が現在時制と密接な關係にあることが分かった。 次に、諸言語との共通点として、談話レベルでは完成相形式が前景化(foreground)の機能を、繼續相形式が背景化(background)の機能を擔う点、時間表現の文法化經路が日本語も他言語と類似している点などを指摘した。 In this paper, we have discussed on aspect in Japanese from the viewpoint of language typology. The main issues are as follows. First, through the contrast of Japanese with Russian aspect, We confirm that the perfective verbs are unmarked form in Japanese while the imperfective verbs are unmarked form in Russian. And Through the contrast with Spanish aspect, we find that the most Romance languages have a three way system of aspect, On the other hand, Japanese have a two way system, and the perfective forms are in the majority of all cases restricted to past time reference, at least when appearing in asserted main clauses. Second, as a common point between the various language, each perfective verb carrying the narrative forward. The imperfective verbs, on the other hand, tend to hold up the narrative of events rather than carry it forward. Furthermore, grammaticalization pathway of time representation in Japan also pointed out that is similar to the other languages.