http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 전수정(Su-Jeong Jeon) (검색결과 5 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
외과계 중환자에서의 초기 정맥영양공급의 현황 분석과 열량대단백비의 임상적 의의
허은정 ( Eun Jeong Heo ),박가영 ( Ka Young Park ),전수정 ( Su Jeong Jeon ),남궁형욱 ( Hyungwook Namgung ),이은숙 ( Eun Sook Lee ),송인애 ( In Ae Song ) 한국정맥경장영양학회 2015 한국정맥경장영양학회지 Vol.7 No.3
Purpose: Surgical critically ill patients require adequate nutrition support and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) guidelines recommend low non-protein calorie: nitrogen ratio (NPC:N ratio, 70∼100) for critically ill pateints. In this study, we assess the current use of early parenteral nutrition of surgical critically ill patients and analyze the clinical significance of NPC:N. Methods: This is a retrospective study of critically ill adult patients who remained in the intensive care unit (ICU) for over 3 days and could not receive enteral nutrition for the first 7 days. Data on parenteral intake of patients were collected from electronic medical records. Association of NPC:N scores with clinical outcome (length of ICU stay, length; of hospital stay, duration of ventilation, and mortality) were analyzed using Pearson correlation and multiple regression. Results: The study included 72 cases, average parenteral calorie intake was 14.6 kcal/kg/day and protein intake was 0.5 g/kg/day. We assessed the NPC:N scores to determine the patients’ NPC:N for the first 7 days in ICU close to the A.S.P.E.N guidelines. NPC:N scores showed weak negative correlation with length of hospital stay and duration of mechanical ventilation (r=-0.259, P=0.028; r=-0.495, P=0.001). Multiple regression adjusted with APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II score, age, and body mass index showed correlation of higher NPC:N score with decreased length of hospital stay and shorter duration of ventilation (P=0.0001, P=0.035, respectively). However, length of ICU stay and mortality within 60 days showed no significant correlation with NPC:N scores. Conclusion: Parenteral calories and protein intakes of critically ill patients in ICU were lower in comparison to A.S.P.E.N. recommendation in this study. Low NPC:N scores might be related to shorter length of hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation. Consultation of a nutritional support team could have a positive effect in providing appropriate nutrition support.
-
전성태(Seong-Tae Jeon),전수정(Su-Jeong Jeon) 세창출판사 2012 창작과 권리 Vol.- No.69
In the customary way, the valid or invalid judgment of the patent was exclusively under the jurisdiction of the administrative agency, in particular patent office. That's why the agency carried out the principle of allocation of authorities faithfully and there was the politic judgment that the specialized agency must be in charge of the technology decision. However if an invalid reason of the relevant patent is obvious in the infringement lawsuit, to judge it invalid in the court precisely without waiting for invalid judgement of the administrative agency, the court could reach a conclusion on whether is the valid or invalid judgment of the patent by reason that it has no occasion to continue the unnecessary dispute and reduce the lawsuit fee. Naturally this is limited to assert the invalid defense of the relevant patent by the defendant. Nevertheless according to acknowledge an invalid defense in the patent infringement lawsuit, there are several issues to realize the economy of lawsuit which had intended. On some circumstances, the lawsuit became complicated, prolonged the period and increased the costs. Therefore this paper investigates on the effect which the approval of the invalid defense in the patent infringement lawsuit has influence on both the party to a lawsuit and practical affairs of court and described to suggest the related issues and future directions in problem solving.
-
미국법상 복수 주체에 의한 특허권 침해책임의 귀속법리에 관한 소고 : Akamai v. Limelight 사건 판결을 소재로
전수정,전성태 梨花女子大學校 法學硏究所 2016 法學論集 Vol.21 No.2
특허제도는 당해 특허발명의 모든 구성요소(클레임)를 실시하여야 특허침해가 성립한다는 ‘구성요소완비의 원칙(all elements rule)’을 채용하고 있다. 그런데 방법발명의 경우 복수주체가 특허발명의 구성요소를 일부씩 분담하여 실시하지만, 이들 각각의 실시를 합하면 당해 발명의 모든 구성요소를 실시하게 되는 경우 누구에게 어떠한 책임을 물어야 할 것인지가 문제되었다. 특히 미국에서는‘구성요소완비의 원칙’에서 파생된 특허의 클레임된 모든 요소가 단일주체에 의해 실시되어야 한다는 단일개체이론에 따라, 각 복수 주체간의 관계성에 주목하여 직접침해의 하나의 형태로서 공동침해의 성립요건이 논의되어 왔다. 특히 최근 미국은 복수 주체에 의한 공동침해에 관한 다양한 판례와 학설이 전개되고 있었으나, 일련의 Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. 사건을 통해서 어느 정도 정리되었다. 이글은 미국 특허권 침해의 적용법리인 보통법상의 불법행위책임과 특허법상의 침해책임 법리를 개관해 보고, Akamai Technologies, Inc.v. Limelight Networks, Inc. 사건을 분석하였다. 이를 통해 미국의 특허법상 공동침해법리의 전개방향을 살펴, 현행 미국에서의 특허권 공동침해에 대한 적용법리 및 해석 기준을 고찰하였다. 결론적으로 미국에서 복수 주체에 의한 특허권 침해책임에 대한 규율 법리는 유형적으로 첫째 복수 주체 중 특정 주체가 ‘지시 또는 통제’라는 지배력을 가지고 있는 경우, 둘째 ‘공동사업’ 관계와 같이 복수 주체 상호간에 서로 대등한 관계에 있는 경우로 나누어 판단되고 있음을 알 수 있다. 결국 미국의 특허침해책임의 법원인 불법행위법상 대위책임과 공동사업책임 법리가 미국 특허법 제271조(a)의 특허권 직접침해책임의 적용에 있어서 하나의 해석기준이 되고 있다고 할 것이다. 여기서 미국의 논의는 우리에게 다음과 같은 시사를 준다고 할 수 있다. 첫째, 특허법의 제원칙인 구성요소완비의 원칙은 단일한 자에 의해 클레임의 모든 구성요소가 실시되어야 하는 것은 아니라 클레임의 모든 구성요소가 실시되는 것으로 충분하다는 점, 둘째, 미국과 마찬가지로 우리나라에서도 특허법상의 침해책임법리만으로는 해결하기 어려운 복수 주체에 의한 공동침해책임에 있어 전통적인 불법행위법을 책임의 근거로 삼을 수 있다는 점이다. The term "patent” refers to a legal right generated to protect a person who creates a new technical idea to contribute to industrial innovation. The patent rights are only assigned to an invention evaluated as a new, useful, and industrial applicability through a series of procedures such as application, examination, and registration. The acquisition of patent rights means that a patentee has an exclusive right to practice his/her patented invention and that the said patentee has the legal authority to prohibit others from practicing his/her invented invention. In other words, a patentee acquires a monopolistic and exclusive right in his/her invention. In addition, the Patent Act recognizes injunction (Article 126 of the Patent Act) and compensation for damages (Article 750 of the Civil Act, Article 128 of the Patent Act) in order to guarantee the patentee's rights. Meanwhile, the single entity rule has been understood as a rule that was derived from the all elements rule and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit established in the BMC case (Resources, Inc. v. Paymentech, L.P. 498 F. 3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2007)). In addition, this rule has been understood as the single biggest obstacle to the recognition of joint patent infringement by joint entity or multiple actors. However, the fact that the ground of the single entity rule is indefinite was also confirmed through the US precedents or the literal interpretation of Article 271(a) of the US patent law. Also, this rule was denied during a rehearing of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the Akamai case. The all elements rule is applied to determine if direct infringement occurred by comparing the elements of claim in a patented invention and in an accused invention. Thus, it was verified that there is no ground to assume in applying this rule and that only a single entity shall practice all elements in a claim.
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
