http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
박은석(번역자),이화진(번역자) 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소 2009 亞細亞硏究 Vol.52 No.2
There certainly exist some positive views toward political developments of Taiwan who has taken the path of gradual democratization after the authoritarian rule of National Party, but this transition requires a more in-depth examination. Post-war politics of Taiwan has shifted from authoritarianism toward post-authoritarianism, and authoritarian era can be divided into three stages; classical authoritarianism under Jiang Jieshi based on pro-US and anti-communist ideology; reformative authoritarianism under Jiang Jingguo which absorbed liberal views; popular authoritarianism led by Li Denghui. Contemporary Taiwan, who can be rightly described to be in post-authoritarian era, is currently witnessing the situation in which unmoderated power struggle between the National Party and the Democratic Progressive Party is taking place in the form of ‘election’. The symbiotic relation between the two Parties is being concealed by severe political struggles, and this cover-up led to degradation of politics into a private politics deprived of publicity. Elections in Taiwanese society no more function as a locus for discussion and choice of public agenda, but as an instrument for mobilizing and disintegrating the people employing the regional identity rivalry. These circumstances prove that post-authoritarian politics is yet no more than another authoritarianism hiding its essence. In order to surmount these problems, two tasks need to be conducted; first, it needs to be indicated that the politics of regional identity and the problem of ‘unification-or-independence’ are fictitious; second, discussion on public politics instead of private politics, equal endorsement of diverse identities and distributive justice and welfare system should be substantialized.
쉬진위(徐進鈺),천광싱(陳光興),이화진(번역자),문수정(번역자) 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소 2009 亞細亞硏究 Vol.52 No.3
This paper aims at tracing intellectual discourse and social practices stretching over 20 years marked by the editorial association of a Taiwanese journal, Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, the progressive and critical intellectual organization that has been calling for critical engagement of intellectuals in Taiwanese society. This is a task of viewing reflectively upon the development of Taiwanese society, politics, economy and culture in a critical standpoint. Through this task we look upon the cases of failures of the past governments, historic errors such as excluding non?Taiwanese origins under the banner of Taiwanization, denying democratic accountability while calling for democratization, oppressing diversity while proclaiming pluralization, pursuing liberalization and globalization with no respect for justice and equality. Through this critical reflection and participation, this association has been seeking to form a positive circle between theories and practices by recognizing the complexity of reality.