http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
자바 프로그래밍 교육에서 웹 기반 강의와 면대면 강의의 학습 효과 비교 분석 연구
이충기,Lee Chung-Ki 한국공학교육학회 2001 공학교육연구 Vol.4 No.2
최근에 인터넷과 웹의 이용이 보편화됨에 따라 이를 교육에도 활용하고자 하는 많은 노력이 이루어지고 있다. 웹을 이용한 웹 기반 강의의 장점은 언제 어디서나 저렴한 비용으로 교육받을 수 있다는 것이다. 따라서 웹 기반 강의의 전망은 매우 밝고 잠재 고객들도 매우 많다고 볼 수 있다. 웹 기반의 자바 프로그래밍 교육 수요도 늘어나고 있다. 본 논문은 자바 프로그래밍 과목을 웹 기반 강의와 면 대 면 강의로 운영한 후 학습 효과를 통계적 추론을 사용하여 비교 분석한다. 이러한 분석 결과를 통하여 웹 기반 강의가 면 대 면 강의에 비해 효과적이지 못하다고 결론짓는다. 또한 자바 프로그래밍 교육에서 웹 기반 강의의 취약점을 파악하고 웹 기반 강의를 질적으로 개선하기 위한 방안을 제안한다. Recently, as the use of the Internet and the Web becomes universal, there has been a great deal of efforts to use it for education. The advantage of a Web-based lecture is that people can take it anywhere at a low cost anytime. Therefore, its prospect is very bright and its potential customers abound. The demand for java programming education using the Web is increasing. This paper compares and analyzes the learning effects of Web-based and traditional lectures in a java programming course, using statistical inference. Based on the analysis result, it concludes that the learning effects of the Web-based lecture are less effective than those of traditional lecture. Also, it recognizes weak points of Web-based lecture in java programming education and proposes a scheme for enhancing Web-based lectures.
A Comparative Study of Involvement and Motivation among Casino Gamblers
이충기,BongKoo Lee,Bo Jason Bernhard,이태경 대한신경정신의학회 2009 PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION Vol.6 No.3
Objective: The purpose of this paper is to investigate three different types of gamblers (which we label “non-problem”, “some problem”, and “probable pathological gamblers”) to determine differences in involvement and motivation, as well as differences in demographic and behavioral variables. Methods: The analysis takes advantage of a unique opportunity to sample on-site at a major casino in South Korea, and the resulting purposive sample yielded 180 completed questionnaires in each of the three groups, for a total number of 540. Factor analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan tests, and Chi-square tests are employed to analyze the data collected from the survey. Results: Findings from ANOVA tests indicate that involvement factors of importance/self-expression, pleasure/interest, and centrality derived from the factor analysis were significantly different among these three types of gamblers. The “probable pathological” and “some problem” gamblers were found to have similar degrees of involvement, and higher degrees of involvement than the non-problem gamblers. The tests also reveal that motivational factors of escape, socialization, winning, and exploring scenery were significantly different among these three types of gamblers. When looking at motivations to visit the casino, “probable pathological” gamblers were more likely to seek winning, the “some problem” group appeared to be more likely to seek escape, and the “non-problem” gamblers indicate that their motivations to visit centered around explorations of scenery and culture in the surrounding casino area. Conclusion: The tools for exploring motivations and involvements of gambling provide valuable and discerning information about the entire spectrum of gamblers. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to investigate three different types of gamblers (which we label “non-problem”, “some problem”, and “probable pathological gamblers”) to determine differences in involvement and motivation, as well as differences in demographic and behavioral variables. Methods: The analysis takes advantage of a unique opportunity to sample on-site at a major casino in South Korea, and the resulting purposive sample yielded 180 completed questionnaires in each of the three groups, for a total number of 540. Factor analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan tests, and Chi-square tests are employed to analyze the data collected from the survey. Results: Findings from ANOVA tests indicate that involvement factors of importance/self-expression, pleasure/interest, and centrality derived from the factor analysis were significantly different among these three types of gamblers. The “probable pathological” and “some problem” gamblers were found to have similar degrees of involvement, and higher degrees of involvement than the non-problem gamblers. The tests also reveal that motivational factors of escape, socialization, winning, and exploring scenery were significantly different among these three types of gamblers. When looking at motivations to visit the casino, “probable pathological” gamblers were more likely to seek winning, the “some problem” group appeared to be more likely to seek escape, and the “non-problem” gamblers indicate that their motivations to visit centered around explorations of scenery and culture in the surrounding casino area. Conclusion: The tools for exploring motivations and involvements of gambling provide valuable and discerning information about the entire spectrum of gamblers.