RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        합리적 의심의 여지 없는 증명 기준에 대한 배심원의 이해도 연구

        김종대 ( Jong Dae Kim ),이은로 ( Eun Lo Lee ),한상훈 ( Sang Hoon Han ) 연세대학교 법학연구원 2011 法學硏究 Vol.21 No.2

        The 「Civil Participation in the Criminal Trial Act」(the Act) passed the National Assembly of Korea on April 30, 2007, and it has come to effect on Jan. 1, 2008. The Act enabled lay persons to take part in decisions in serious criminal trials. The jury trial is the new system in Korean history. In this sense the introduction of the jury system is regarded as an immense change of the judiciary system. Even though the new Korean jury system does not take the conventional form of the English or American jury-a kind of hybrid systme of German mixed judge tribunal and American jury, the jury deliberates without judges at the first stage. So jury insturctions are important and crucial to ensure the fair and correct verdicts and sentences. This research involves 334 college students, and 519 adults, and three versions of instructions on the proof beyond a reasonable doubt are employed. The results show that mock jurors understand the standards slightly differently by versions. So we can conclude that sophisticated and right jury instructions are needed to enhance jury understanding of the standards of proof beyond a reasonable doubt as well as other criminal principles.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼