http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
합리적 의심의 여지 없는 증명 기준에 대한 배심원의 이해도 연구
김종대 ( Jong Dae Kim ),이은로 ( Eun Lo Lee ),한상훈 ( Sang Hoon Han ) 연세대학교 법학연구원 2011 法學硏究 Vol.21 No.2
The 「Civil Participation in the Criminal Trial Act」(the Act) passed the National Assembly of Korea on April 30, 2007, and it has come to effect on Jan. 1, 2008. The Act enabled lay persons to take part in decisions in serious criminal trials. The jury trial is the new system in Korean history. In this sense the introduction of the jury system is regarded as an immense change of the judiciary system. Even though the new Korean jury system does not take the conventional form of the English or American jury-a kind of hybrid systme of German mixed judge tribunal and American jury, the jury deliberates without judges at the first stage. So jury insturctions are important and crucial to ensure the fair and correct verdicts and sentences. This research involves 334 college students, and 519 adults, and three versions of instructions on the proof beyond a reasonable doubt are employed. The results show that mock jurors understand the standards slightly differently by versions. So we can conclude that sophisticated and right jury instructions are needed to enhance jury understanding of the standards of proof beyond a reasonable doubt as well as other criminal principles.