http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 심지연 ( Sim Jeeyun ) (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
한국어 듣기 평가에서 영상 자료의 역할 -숙달도에 따른 차이를 중심으로-
심지연 ( Jeeyun Sim ) 이중언어학회 2019 이중언어학 Vol.75 No.-
The purpose of this study is to confirm the roles of video in listening test and to measure visual factors influencing listening comprehension by its degree of proficiency. This study conducted two different types of tests: audio only test and audiovisual test were performed on 31 learners. The result showed that learners in audiovisual test had performed better in Korean listening comprehension assessment and it had statistically meaningful difference. As a result of investigation on visual factors which are helpful in listening understanding, it was verified that situation and psychological factors ranked high, but speaker related factors were verified in low ranking. More Specifically, it was found that both the listening situation and the learner’s psychological status were helpful for listening comprehension, whereas mouth shape, facial expression and gesture had limited impact. Based on these results, the concept of Korean listening ability was broadly defined including ability to use visual cues throughout this thesis. (Korea University)
-
외국인 유학생의 조 발표 평가를 위한 구인 개발 연구 -내용 초점의 발표를 중심으로-
김지애 ( Kim Jiae ),심지연 ( Sim Jeeyun ) 국제한국어교육학회 2018 한국어 교육 Vol.29 No.4
This study aims to develop the constructs for evaluating team presentations performed by undergraduate international students in Korea. To achieve the goal, this study reviews related research and sets the criteria to analyze the problems of team presentations performed in Korean by undergraduate international students. Through this analysis we got to know which problems they were making. They were failing to reorganize the resources they had referenced and to organize the contents into one. And errors or mistakes of grammar and spelling were found often in their PPT files, and the editing styles of the PPTs were not consistent. Moreover, their performances were not unlike their PPT files. One made a good presentation but the other students just recited the script without interaction with the audience. Moreover, they could not operate the Q&A part and lead the discussion well, and components for wrapping up the presentation also were omitted frequently. After the analysis, this study conducted a survey with 23 Korean language educators asking about the validity of the construct and description of the survey. Based on the collected feedback, the construct list has been modified primarily, and carried out a second survey with an expert group. Based on their opinion, the final construct list was fine-tuned. (Seoul Cyber University, Korea University)
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
