http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
특허권 비실시자의 특허가 침해된 경우 구제 방법으로서 Liability Rule
박성민(Park, Sung-Min),방민주(Bang, Min-Joo),변준석(Byun, Jun-Suk) 세창출판사 2010 창작과 권리 Vol.- No.58
The current patent law is based on Property Rule. But, as we can see in USA, such protection system has defects in protection of non-practicing patentee's right. The main causes are high transaction costs, wealth effect, and strategic behavior. Therefore, under certain condition, Liability Rule should be applied. Considering non-practicing patentees includes not only patent trolls but also individual inventorㆍsmall-sized corporations, excessive application of Liability Rule may bring them improper handicap and compromise development of industry, which is purpose of the patent law. Liability Rules should be applied under following circumstances. First, in case non-practicing patentee behaved strategically for the purpose of getting leverage. But in real case, it would not be easy to determine what is strategic behavior and what is not. Second, in case infringers put much higher economic values than non-practicing patentee on patent itself. If Property Rule is applied in such circumstances, a patent fee will be wrongfully high because of wealth effect. To avoid evaluation error, value should be 'much' higher. If a patent fee of exclusive-license set properly, someone who have intention of practicing will be motivated to develop new patent, and avoid encroaching precedent patents by pre-searching. Definitely, those effects are important factor of development of industry.
최도진(Do-Jin Choi),오영호(Young-Ho Oh),편도웅(Do-Woong Pyun),방민주(Min-Ju Bang),전종우(Jong-Woo Jeon),이현병(Hyeon-Byeong Lee),박득배(Deukbae Park),임종태(Jong-Tae Lim),복경수(Kyoung-Soo Bok),유효근(Hyo-Keun Yoo),유재수(Jae-Soo Yoo 한국콘텐츠학회 2021 한국콘텐츠학회논문지 Vol.21 No.12
특정 연구 분야에 대한 전문성을 가진 연구자를 찾기 위해서는 객관적인 전문가 판별 방법이 필요하다. 기존에는 전문가 판별을 위해 인용 그래프 기반의 판별 기법과 수식 기반의 판별 기법이 존재한다. 본 논문에서는 기존 수식 기반 판별에서 고려하지 못하였던 다양한 특성들을 반영한 효율적인 전문가 판별 기법을 제안한다. 연구자의 전문성을 판별하기 위해 품질, 생산성, 기여도, 최신성, 정확성, 지속성을 고려한 전문성 지수를 제안한다. 또한, 학술 검색 사이트만의 특성을 반영하기 위해 소셜 인용 수를 추가로 고려한다. 다양한 학술 사이트 기반의 논문 수집 및 성능 평가 결과를 제시하고 제안하는 기법의 타당성과 실현성을 입증한다. An objective expert discrimination scheme is needed for finding researchers who have insight and knowledge about a particular field of research. There are two types of expert discrimination schemes such as a citation graph based method and a formula based method. In this paper, we propose an efficient expert discrimination scheme considering various characteristics that have not been considered in the existing formula based methods. In order to discriminate the expertise of researchers, we present six expertise indices such as quality, productivity, contributiveness, recentness, accuracy, and durability. We also consider the number of social citations to apply the characteristics of academic search sites. Finally, we conduct various experiments to prove the validity and feasibility of the proposed scheme.