http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
급성기 족관절 염좌 환자에 대한 환측취혈(患側取穴)과 건측취혈(健側取穴)의 치료 효과 비교 연구
정효근,정영표,강수우,이지은,위준,임정아,김재홍,류충열,조명래,윤여충,Jung, Hyo-Keun,Jeong, Yeong-Pyo,Chiang, Suo-Yue,Lee, Ji-Eun,Wi, Jun,Im, Jeong-A,Gim, Jae-Hong,Ryu, Chung-Yeol,Cho, Myeong-Rae,Yun, Yeo-Chung 대한침구의학회 2008 대한침구의학회지 Vol.25 No.3
Objectives : The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of the acupuncture at affected limb and unaffected limb on treating ankle sprain of acute stage. Methods : From October 1st, 2007 to March 23rd, 2008, the 60 patients who had visited Dongshin mokdong oriental medical hospital and Gwangju oriental medical hospital, Dongshin university with acute ankle sprain were divided into 2 groups ; one group took acupuncture at affected limb, and the other group took acupuncture at unaffected limb. To evaluating the efficiency of each treatment, Visual Analog Scale(VAS) and Ankle-Hindfoot Scale(AHS) were applied before treatment and after 3rd treatment. Results : As a result of evaluating by using VAS, the score of acupuncture at unaffected limb was marked lower than the score of acupuncture at affected limb. As a result of evaluating by using AHS, the score comparison between the two groups had no significance after treatment. Conclusions : Acupuncture at unaffected limb is more effective than acupuncture at affected limb on treating ankle sprain of acute stage.