http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이주희(Lee, Joohee),다카요시 쿠사고(Kusago, Takayoshi),정성진(Jung, Sungjin),전주현(Jeon, Juhyeon) 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소 2013 亞細亞硏究 Vol.56 No.2
Both Korea and Japan had managed to achieve rather egalitarian income distribution, despite their limited social spending on welfare programs. However, after the economic depression and financial crisis of the 1980s and 1990s, these two countries suffered from deepened labor market dualization and thus failed to maintain full employment. Welfare expansion reforms were required to overcome the crisis, but both countries were reluctant to increase government spending. This study investigates whether the Korean and the Japanese public want to support the universal welfare states which involve higher tax rates, and what factors influence their welfare preferences. The analysis of this study demonstrates that the majority of the Korean and the Japanese prefer welfare spending even if it results in higher taxes. The respondents with higher socio-economic status were more willing to pay higher taxes than the respondents with lower socio-economic status in both Korea and Japan. It might be because current work-based social protection in these countries provide more benefits to those with secure and highly paid jobs. In order to broaden the support for universalistic welfare state, Korea and Japan need to improve social protection for lower socio-economic groups including nonstandard workers.