자연친화 숲 프로그램을 활용한 자유놀이가 유아 창의성에 미치는 효과

김수희 ( Su Hee Kim ) KNU기업경영연구소 2021 기업경영리뷰 Vol.12 No.3

본 연구는 자연친화 숲프로그램을 활용한 자유놀이가 유아의 창의성에 미치는 효과를 살펴보는데 목적이 있다. 김수희 외(2015)가 개발한 자연친화 숲프로그램을 활용하여 개정누리과정에서 강조하는 자유놀이를 중심으로 서울시 S구에 위치한 교육기관 만 5세 유아 22명(실험집단 11명, 통제집단 11명)을 대상으로 실시하였다. 검사도구로는 전경원(2000)이 개발한 유아용 창의성 측정도구를 이용하였다. 실험집단과 통제집단의 프로그램 실시전과 후를 살펴보는 설계방식으로 하여 자연친화 숲프로그램을 활용한 자유놀이의 효과를 검증하였다. SPSS 22.0 프로 그램을 사용하여 T검증을 실시한 결과 첫째, 만 5세 유아의 언어창의성에서는 유의미한 효과가 있었으나 둘째, 만 5세 유아의 동작창의성에서는 유의미한 효과가 나타나지 않았다. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of free play on the creativity of infants using nature-friendly forest programs. Using the nature-friendly forest program developed by Kim Su-hee and others (2015), the program was conducted on 22 5-year-old infants (11 experimental groups and 11 control groups) located in S-gu, Seoul, focusing on free play in the revised Nuri process. As an inspection tool, a child creativity inspection tool developed by Jeon Kyung-won (2000) was used, and the effectiveness of free play using nature-friendly forest programs was verified by the experiment and control group pre-post inspection design. The T-test using the SPSS 22.0 program showed significant effects on language creativity in infants aged 5 years old, but not sig-nificant effects on behavior creativity in infants aged 5 years old.

인간 포배기 배아의 초자화 동결에 관한 연구: II. 초자화 동결이 포배기 배아의 착상 및 임신에 미치는 영향

김수희,이상원,이주희,강상민,오희정,이승민,이성구,윤혜균,윤산현,박세필,송해범,임진호,Kim, Su-Hee,Lee, Sang-Won,Lee, Ju-Hee,Kang, Sang-Min,Oh, Hee-Jeong,Lee, Seoung-Min,Lee, Seong-Goo,Yoon, Hye-Gyun,Yoon, San-Hyun,Park, Se-Pill,Song, Hai- 대한생식의학회 2000 Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine Vol.27 No.1

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of vitrification on the implantation and the pregnancy of human blastocysts. Method: The transfer of the frozen-thawed blastocysts by the slow freezing or vitrification was performed between January 1998 and July 1999. The zygotes derives from IVF were cocultured with cumulus cells in YS medium containing 20% hFF for 5days. Two or three of the best balstocysts produced on day 5 were transferred into the uterus, and then supernumerary blastocysts were randomly divided into two groups. One was frozen by slow freezing and the other was frozen by vitrification method. The slow freezing procedure was performed in two steps (5% glycerol and 9% glycerol + 0.2 M sucrose for 10 min, respectively) using programmed freezer ($-2^{\circ}C$/min to $-7^{\circ}C$, manual seeding at $-7^{\circ}C$, $-0.3^{\circ}C$/min to $-38^{\circ}C$ and plunged into $LN_{2}$). The blastocysts frozen by slow freezing were thawed at $36^{\circ}C$ then removed glycerol in 7 steps. The vitrification procedure was performed in three steps (10% glycerol for 5 min, 10% glycerol + 20% ethylene glycol for 5 min, 25% glycerol + 25% ethylene glycol and directly $LN_{2}$ within 1 min). The blastocysts frozen by vitrification were thawed at $20^{\circ}C$ water then removed cryoprotectant in 3 steps. In each group, thawed blastocysts were cocultured with cumulus cells in YS medium containing 20% hFF for 18h and transferred into the uterus. The implantation rate was evaluated per transferred blastocysts and the pregnancy rate was evaluated per transfers. Results: The survival rate of vitrified group (74.5%) was higher than slow freezing group (68.0%), but not significant. When 98 thawed blastocysts of vitrification were transferred in 40 cycles, 19 pregnancies (clinical pregnancy rate; 47.5%) were established. One miscarriage occurred in the eighth week of pregnancy (ongoing pregnancy rate; 45.0%). 7 pregnancies were ongoing, 11 pregnancies went to term, and 16 healthy infants were born. The Implantation rate was 31.6%. These results were higher than those obtained by the slow freezing (clinical pregnancy rate; 40.3%, ongoing pregnancy rate; 32.5% and implantation rate; 25.3%), but not significant. Conclusion: Vitrification is a simple, quick and economical method when compared to slow freezing. It will be chosen as a good method of human embryo freezing in IVF-ET programs.

저가의 MCU를 사용하여 HSMS 통신 시스템 설계 및 구현

김수희,Kim, Su-Hee 한국정보통신학회 2015 한국정보통신학회논문지 Vol.19 No.12

HSMS communication system using low-cost micro controller units(MCUs) is an essential technique for online semiconductor equipment system developments. It is intended as an alternative to SEMI E4 (SECS-I) for applications where higher speed communication is needed and the facilitated hardware setup is convenient. In this paper, an HSMS communication system using low-cost MCUS is designed and implemented. Using a MCU with a low price but high-performance as a main board, a module which processes HSMS communication is designed, and a circuit is designed to process BCR independently with a microminiature MCU. To convert tag data which is recognized from BCR into data based on HSMS communication protocol, SECS-II message is designed. Lastly, an HSMS communication system is implemented based on these designs. A low-cost HSMS communication module developed in this study can be applied in realtime monitoring and controlling system for semiconductor processes. 저가의 MCU를 사용한 HSMS 구동 시스템은 반도체 설비 온라인 시스템 구축에는 없어서는 안 될 필수적인 기술이다. HSMS는 더 빠른 속도의 통신이 필요하고 장비 하드웨어 구성이 용이한 어플리케이션을 위해 SECS-I 대신에 많이 사용된다. 기존의 SECS와 HSMS 디바이스는 SECS의 전반적인 프로토콜 구현되어 있어서 매우 고가이다. 이 연구에서는 기업에서 필요로 하는 SECS 프로토콜만을 지원하는 HSMS 통신 시스템을 설계하고 구현하고자 한다. 저가이지만 고성능 MCU를 메인 보드로 하여 HSMS 통신을 처리하는 모듈을 설계하고, BCR을 독립적으로 처리 할 수 있는 회로를 초소형 MCU를 이용하여 설계한다. 그리고 BCR로부터 인식된 태그 데이터를 HSMS 통신 프로토콜에 부합하는 데이터로 변환하기 위해 SECS-II 메시지를 설계한다. 이 설계들을 반영한 HSMS 통신 시스템을 개발한다. 개발한 저가의 HSMS 통신 모듈은 반도체 공정에 대한 실시간 감시 및 제어 시스템에 적용될 수 있다.

러시아의 민족국가 기원에 관한 학설 비교연구

김수희(Kim, Su-Hee) 아시아·중동부유럽학회 2011 동유럽발칸학 Vol.13 No.1

The arguments about the origin of the first national state of Russia have been continued over 250 years. The beginning of the arguments resulted from inaccuracies of the historical data and the linguistic analysis of archaeological sources based on the legend. Moreover, the motive of some scholars who began to intensify the arguments is to rationalize their nationalism in their study of the origin of Russia in politically acute situation. The name of the first national state of Russia is “Kievan Rus’ (КиевскаяРусь)”. With this, in western countries, some scholars consider the founding subjects of the state as northman which is the ancient Scandinavian But, many Russians are seeing founding fathers as Slavs. Such an extreme insistence originates from differences of analysis about Kiev(Киев) as place-name that is clarified in name of the country and Rus'(Русь) as building subject of the state. Therefore, introduce western and Russia datas that become basis of these argument, and wish to apply historic access method that is depending on knowledge experience enemy and indicate problems of this arguments. This is effort to put origin language sources about place-name and a race that is small and narrow sight and intercept endless argument, Wrote to analogize truth through influence and order that is accepting Area of the Eurasian plain two in macroscopic inside measurement. As Civilization of Eastern Europe does lard in the context of history, it result by religious workers of Rādhấniya be. These are not Islamite and cooperation between Rādhấniya and Khazars is available by relation that Christian is not. A various race and languages, and reunified society and economical true nature were symbol of Mare Balticum. This was result of political rescue that sea nomadic peoples combine with empires of grassy plain and commercial activity that exchange superiors open to select charisma. Mare Balticum means accommodation ladder’s Baltic Sea here. Therefore, Rus’ regional governing power and role want to see as definite basis in country construction of the Russia in Slav move and dwelling environment. 러시아의 민족국가 기원에 관한 논쟁은 약 250년간 지속되고 있다. 논쟁의 핵심은 명확한 자료의 부재 속에 전설에 기초한 자료와 언어학과 고고학적 해석의 부정확성에 따른 결과이다. 더욱이 이 같은 상황에서 논쟁을 격화시키고 있는 요인은 민족주의적 사관에 따른 자신들의 주장을 합리화시키려고 했던 슬라브학파에서 유래한다. 러시아 최초의 민족국가의 명칭은 “끼예프 루시(Киевская Русь)”이다. “끼예프 루시”의 건국의 주체를 서방세계에서는 일반적으로 고대 스칸디나비아인(Northman)으로 보고 있는 반면 다수의 러시아인들은 슬라브족으로 보고 있다. 이 같은 상반된 주장은 국가의 명칭에 명시된 지명인 끼예프(Киев)와 국가 건설의 주체로서 루시(Русь)에 대한 해석의 차이에서 기인한다. 따라서 이러한 논쟁의 근거가 된 서방과 러시아 자료들을 소개하고, 경험적 지식에 의존하고 있는 역사적 접근방법을 적용하여 이 논쟁들의 문제점들을 지적하고자 한다. 이것은 지엽적인 지명과 인종의 명칭의 기원에 대한 학자들의 소모적인 논쟁을 차단하기 위한 노력이며, 거시적 안목에서 “끼예프 루시”가 건국되던 시기에 이 지역을 중심으로 전개되었던 유라시아문명의 발달이라는 관점에서 새로운 시각을 제공하려는 것이다. 동구의 문명화는 라드하니야(Rādhấniya)의 교역업자들의 덕분이었다. 당시 노예 교역이 활발했던 동구는 800-860년까지 이미 이해관계를 가진 2개 영역으로 분할되어졌다. 남부는 3개의 유목민적 행보를 보였던 아발, 불갈, 하자르족간의 분리로 유지됐으며, 북 동구는 대(大) 스웨덴인(Great Sweden)을 주민으로 하는 카리스마적씨족 및 루시(Rus')회사의 중개인들이 지도한 마레이 발티쿰(Mare Balticum)의 지배가 되었다. 여기서 마레이 발티쿰은 현재의 발틱해를 의미한다. 따라서 필자는 슬라브족의 이주와 거주환경 속에서 루시의 지역에 대한 지배적인 역할을 러시아 최초의 민족국가건설에 결정적 근거로 볼 가능성이 많다는 것을 이 논문에서 지적하고자 한다.

문서의 효율적인 검색을 위한 HTML 문서 변환 시스템

김수희(Su-Hee Kim),장대용(Dae-Yong Chang) 한국정보과학회 2000 한국정보과학회 학술발표논문집 Vol.27 No.2Ⅰ

이 연구에서는 텍스트 문서를 웹에서 HTML 문서 형태로 효율적으로 검색할 수 있는 변환 시스템을 개발하였다. 웹상에 사용자가 원하는 부분만을 HTML 문서 형태로 제공하도록 문서의 논리적인 구조를 파악하며 그 구조에 대한 정보와 각 논리 단위에 해당하는 부분의 범위 정보를 저장할 수 있도록 관계형 데이터베이스 스키마를 개발하였다. 개발한 시스템은 문서의 목차 테이블을 자동으로 구축하고 목차 테이블의 각 항목에 하이퍼링크를 설정한다. 문서를 웹에서 검색하기 위한 첫 화면은 목차 테이블이며, 그 중 한 항목이 클릭되면 그 항목의 내용이 제공되고, 만약 그 하위에 속하는 항목들이 있다면 그들에 대한 링크를 역시 제공한다. 이러한 방법으로 한 문서의 전체를 그 논리 구조에 따라 사용자가 원하는 대로 검색할 수 있다. 이 시스템은 멀티미디어 타입의 문서를 하이퍼미디어 문서 형식으로 변환할 수 있도록 확장하여 보완 개발될 수 있고, 장래에 전자 출판과 전자 도서관에 응용될 수 있다.

Central Venous Catheter Removal Distress Syndrome 2 예

김수희(Su Hee Kim),박성오(Sung Oh Park),고혁(Hyeok Koh),최종수(Jong Su Choi),송경일(Kyoung Il Song) 대한신장학회 2002 Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Vol.21 No.1

Much attention has been paid to the insertion of central venous catheter(CVC) but their removal is a subject discussed rarely. After removal of a central venous catheter, rare but potentially life-threatening, transient cardiopulmonary collapse or neurological dysfunction had developed. The failure to appreciate these complications may be a significant factor in their high mortality. Early recognition and treatment may be made possible by a high index of suspicion. In this report, the clinical courses of two patients with central venous catheter removal distress syndrome are reviewed. Also guidelines for safe removal of CVC are formulated. An awareness of potential CVC removal complications is most important for their prevention and timely treatment. CVCs should be removed with the same degree of meticulous attention to detail that accompanies their insertion. Medical personnel should be reminded that removal of the catheter is an integral component of CVC management. (Korean J Nephrol 2002;21(1):165- 170)

알루미늄 염색 양성 소견을 보인 고교체 (High-turnover) 신성 골이영양증 (Renal Osteodystrophy)

김수희 ( Su Hee Kim ),박용구 ( Yong Koo Park ),장재원 ( Jai Won Chang ),이은경 ( Eun Kyoung Lee ),최정 ( Jung Choi ),박수길 ( Su Kil Park ) 대한신장학회 2005 Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Vol.24 No.2

초,중고 역사교과서에서의 독도 기술과 방향성 검토

김수희 ( Su Hee Kim ) 역사교육학회 2013 역사교육논집 Vol.51 No.-

This study analysed descriptions in the current Korean Dokdo education, focusing on Korean history textbooks of revised ``Elementary·Secondary School Curriculum``(2010) and examined its directionality. Korean textbooks should be configured as a logical system to response to Japanese claim of sovereignty over Takeshima/Dokdo, clearly shown in ``10 points for understanding Takeshima``. Descriptions in current Korean Elementary·Secondary School textbooks would be summarized as follows. At elementary school level, according to the ideals of education, that "territory is our living foundation for generations", Dokdo education should necessarily emphasize ancestors who had defended living space. The stories of fishermen having relied on Dokdo as an inevitable living space, such as An Yong-bok who banished Japanese from Dokdo, fishermen from Geomundo, women divers from Jeju who gave thanks and performed worship for god of the Sea, Choi Jong-deok, the first resident of Dokdo, have us realize that Dokdo is our precious living foundation. At middle school level, Dokdo education should reconfirm earlier recognition of Dokdo islets as living foundation based on the Part of King Sejong in the Annals of the Choson Dynasty Girijy . In order to refute the Japanese theory that Dokdo is Japanese historical territory, should be put forward evidence such as fishing activities of fishermen from Ulleungdo and document of Daizokan(1887) to the effect that Dokdo does not belong to Japan. At high school level, Dokdo education should cultivate critical thinking of high school students so as to contemplate Dokdo issue between the two countries. The process of San Francisco Peace Treaty would be of help to refute ``10 points for understanding Takeshima`` written by Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and identify problems of Lusk letter. Our current Dokdo textbooks lack of facts and objectivity, only emphasizing the fact that Dokdo is our territory. The improvement of Dokdo education should be made in the direction to identify the issues and criticize Japanese claims.

논문(論文) : 근대 일본식 어구 안강망의 전파와 서해안 어장의 변화 과정

김수희 ( Su Hee Kim ) 대구사학회 2011 대구사학 Vol.104 No.-

Transfiguration process of west coast fishing industry in modern times is different from the south coast, and Japanese are encroaching on the west coast fishing ground because of the lack of croaker fishing ground and the use of common fishing ground, croaker production volume tribe, the activities of the fishes carrier. At that time Japanese fishing activities was allowed in the 4 province of Hamgyeong-do and Gangwon-do, Gyoengsang-do, jeolla-do 4 degree in 1882 the trade rules contracting. After appearance of the Japanese fisherman near the Gaeyado of Jeollabuk-do around 1890, Japan improved the Angangmang which hits to the west coast fishing ground and soothes Koreans` repelling the warship with the expedient which the west coast fishing ground with periodic and went round observed. Under Japanese imperialism policy like this the many fishermen did illegal fishing and strained the blown Pasi structure in the Chuchung-do and Gyoenggi-do, Hwanghae-do, Pyeongan-do. The points which comes to reveal from the research which are like this. First, the stow net fishing introduced in the west coast 1900 was improved under Japanese imperialism policy. From the area where stow net advances Japan provided a fishing industry grants for going out fishing fishermen in the Korea and encouraged the west coast fishing ground. Secondly, The fishing ground which the stow net fisherman went to the front was the uninhabited island not the main place of Korean croaker fishing ground and they had a snapper and croaker fishing around this place. These fishery could sell off every where because Koreans like the croaker most. The croaker compared in supply and the demand was insufficient absolutely and price rises, the croaker production volume of Korea was stalemate. Japanese fishermen supplied a many croaker and they transacted business with Korean merchant in these days. Thirdly, the stow net fishing was similar to the Jungsoen of the fishing methods which advances west coast fishing ground but the capital does not hold plentifully and fishing amount was hight. The Korean fishermen purchased the clipper and a phrase from the Japanese and went into stow net fishing in the Japanese main fishing ground like Island areas of Chungcheongnam-do. 30% of total stow net was Korean possession in the Japanese colonial period. Fourthly, as stow net and Jungseonmang to move the fishing ground along a tide in this way developed, the fishery base-like seasonal fish market that was different from seasonal fish market of the Chosoen period appeared in the west coast fishing ground. A temporary village was formed in the islands area of the west coast by a fishing boat and a business ship moved by croaker fishing season, and merchants moving in pursuit of them. As for the croaker fishery to move a school of fish later, the fishery base-like fishery that was in seasonal fish market form developed by the activity of the fishermen who went up it from the south with the Japanese fishermen who crossed it from Japan every year.

논문(論文) : 개항기 일본어민의 조선어장 침탈과 러,일간의 각축

김수희 ( Su Hee Kim ) 대구사학회 2011 대구사학 Vol.102 No.-

Japanese fishermen`s advance to Choseon fishery and their fishery activity in modern Japanese period was occurred by tacit approval or laissez faire of Japanese government about Japanese fishermen`s violence and plunder around Chaejudo and matter of Japanese diving bell fishermen conflict. Japan prohibited fishing activity around disputed Chaejudo area on the basis of principle in 1883 fishery agreement with Choseon, which stimulated Japanese who took strong measure such as violence or reward them money for taking the plunder and murder toward Choseon fishermen. The Japanese fishermen who took such a terrible action toward Choseon people were filed at consular but immune as ignorance by the extraterritorial rights. After the event, Japan fishermen took the power and violence as normal behavior to rule Choseon people who against toward fishing activity in Japan sea area and acted as outlaw. In this aspect, the advancement of Japanese fishermen to Choseon fishery and the fishery activity became the van of Japan imperialism and invaded to Choseon fishery by the background of Japanese power. At the time, Ministry of Agriculture and Commerce Chief of Marine Department Maki Bokusin(牧朴眞) noted the Choseon-Japan Fishery Treatment(朝·日通漁章程) in 1899 ``Japanese should consider Choseon Sea as Sea of Japan, and never allow Choseon people though fish in Sea of Japan but not to recognize Sea of Japan as Sea of Japan is the basic concept of fishery agreement`` and emphasized one Choseon Sea and Sea of Japan. When contradiction between Russia and Japan became serious in 1902, Japan planned to construct fishery base at Choseon fishery for fishing activity in Japanese area. This fishery base construction plan was more stipulated by forming the Japanese fishery immigration village and 1908 equivalent legal rights with Choseon people under the ``fishery code`` and preparation of structural change and modification of marine product distribution system in Choseon on the legal articles to let the Choseon fishery under the Japanese rule. This kind of colonization of Choseon fishery was more developed by Japanese imperialism to construct Japanese fishery base. Japanese fishery base was constructed around Choseon seashore and island area during Russo-Japan War period, which invoked Japanese sea lion fishermen Nakai Yosaburo(中井養三郞) to annex Dokdo as Japan territory. The recognition of Japan Ministry of Agriculture and Commerce Chief of Marine Department Makibokshin(牧朴眞) who informed Nakai about the terra nullius of Dokdo and the promotion of Choseon fishery policy as ``Fishery Activity`` became the outline of Dokdo invasion and simple evidence of Japanese aggressive fishery policy.