기후변화 대응으로서 에너지 전환을 위한 지방정부의 전략과 과제

김문현(Moon Hyun, Kim),박시현(Si Hyun, Park) 한국환경정책학회 2018 한국환경정책학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2018 No.2

헌법재판소(憲法裁判所)와 국회(國會)의 관계(關係)에 관한 일 고찰(考察)-헌법재판(憲法裁判)과 민주주의(民主主義), 권력분립주의(權力分立主義)의 조화(調和)의 관점에서

김문현 ( Moon Hyun Kim ) 이화여자대학교 법학연구소 2006 法學論集 Vol.11 No.1

1. Decisions of the Constitutional Court mean many times a kind of political decisions under the guise of judicial decisions. In a sense Decisions of the Constitutional Court mean legislations. 2. ``Verfassungsgerichtbarkeit`` is a very important institution for guarantee of the Constitutionalism, but there may be troubles between ``Verfassungsgerichtbarkeit`` and democracy. 3. There have been disputes about Judicial Activism and Judicial Passivism. But for the harmony between ``Verfassungsgerichtbarkeit`` and democracy, adopting multi-level scrutiny has very important meaning. 4. As the main theoretical foundation for multi-level scrutiny, I think the Political Process Theory of Judicial Review in the U.S. is more persuasive.

요한복음 5:1-18의 내러티브 읽기

김문현(Moon Hyun Kim) 한국복음주의신약학회 2010 신약연구 Vol.9 No.4

The article explores the characterization of the crippled man in John 5:1-18. The portrayal or characterization of the crippled man is closely related to the overall plot of this healing narrative (John 5:1- 47). The article tries to investigate the sign of healing, the dialogue over the sign to understand the characterization of the crippled man in 5:1-18. The sign of healing is closely related to John's characterization of Jesus as God's divine agent to do God's work and that of the crippled man as a helpful clue to understand the identity of Jesus. The article focuses on the characterization of the crippled man by way of the dialogue with Jesus in the healing miracle (5:1-9). The man in some ways is identified with a representative or symbolic role as the Judeans. Furthermore, the man seems to reflect the disability of the suffering Judean multitude. The healing narrative will show his collaboration with the Judean authorities. Related to this man's characterization is the final vignette of the Sabbath controversy, which clearly demonstrates the disposition of the Judeans. The characterization of the man is negatively described. The article shows that although the man is now cured physically, he is not cured spiritually; his faith has not grown. Finally, the healing of the invalid man reflects God's involvement in this present world. To project the idea of Jesus' divinity, the man functions as a foil to demonstrate God's healing work on humanity. Jesus as the healer asks whether humanity is willing to be healthy, both directly and indirectly.

기본권의 법적 근거와 판단기준에 관한 소고

김문현 ( Hyun Kim Moon ) 국제헌법학회,한국학회 2012 世界憲法硏究 Vol.18 No.2

기본권이 어떤 권리이고 그 범위는 어떠한지에 대한 판단은 명확치 않고 그로 인해 다양한 권리가 기본권이라 주장되고 있다. 이 논문은 기본권은 무엇을 통해 인식할 수 있고, 어떤 기준으로 기본권성을 인정할 수 있는가에 대하여 고찰함을 목적으로 하고 있다. 기본권은 헌법에 의해 직접 보장되는 주관적 권리라는 점에서 인권이나 법률적 권리와 구별되며 기본권의 문제는 의회주의-다수결주의에 전적으로 맡겨져 있는 것이 아닌, 최종적으로는 입헌주의에 따른 헌법재판소의 판단사항임을 의미한다. 기본권은 개별적 기본권에 관한 헌법규정, 헌법 제10조, 제37조 제1항을 통해 인식할 수 있으며 헌법 제2장의 기본권규정과 다른 헌법규정이나 헌법상 원리나 제도 등을 연계하여 기본권의 구체적 내용을 구성할 수 있다. 그러나 원리나 제도에서 바로 기본권이 도출되는 것이 아니며, 원리나 제도와 관련하여 구체적 권리가 인정된다면 그것은 기본권규정에 근거한 것이거나 법률적 권리로 보아야 한다. 기본권개념의 지나친 확장은 자칫 입법이나 공공정책의 판단에 맡겨야 할 권리의 문제를 헌법적 효력을 부여함으로써 헌법재판관의 가치적 선호를 기본권의 확장을 매개로 실현함으로써 다수지배에 기초한 민주주의룰 훼손하는 문제를 초래할 수도 있다.결국 기본권성 여부는 그 권리가 어느 정도 역사와 전통, 관행에 뿌리를 가지고 있고, 변화된 시대, 사회의 현실에 있어서 기본권의 원천으로서 인간의 존엄성실현에 얼마나 중요하고 필요하며 구체적 의미를 가지는가, 그 권리가 국민과 국제사회의 법적 관습과 의식에 의해 어느 정도 지지되고 있으며, 다수지배로 부터 보호되어야 하는가 등에 의해 판단되어야 할 것이다. A variety of rights has been claimed as Grundrechte(basic rights), but it is not clear whether they are Grundrechte or not. Grundrechte are different from human rights, and legal rights that are grounded on the legislations. Grundrechte are guaranteed in the Constitution and bind alll state power. In addition, they may be limited only in accordance with the paragraph 2 of Article 37 of the Constitution, Grundrechte may be discovered the grounds on Article 10, individual provisions about Grundrechte, and on paragraph 1 of Article 37 of the Constitution, but they can not be derived from institutions or constitutional principles. As the Spreme Court of the U.S. stated in Washington v. Gluckberg(1997), “by extending constitutinal protection to an asserted right, we, to a great extent, place the matter outside the arena of public debate and legislative action.” In nature, freedom and equal protection are comprehensive, but social rights and right to vote etc. are not. Not explicitly stated in clear in the Constitution whether the asserted right is a basic right or not, it should be decided according to whether the right is deeply rooted in the history and traditions, practices, to whether it is supported by the changed reality, public consciousness, and international human rights declarations and legislations, and to whether it should be not open to legislations and policies.

요한복음 21:1-11의 내러티브 읽기 - 베드로의 인물성격과 역할을 중심으로 -

김문현(Moon Hyun Kim) 한국복음주의신약학회 2016 신약연구 Vol.15 No.1

This article is a critical narrative analysis of John 21:1-11 by focusing on the characterization and role of Peter. The article assumes that John 21 is a natural narrative continuation of the previous chapters (1-20) and it tries to explore a narrative analysis of the fishing expedition and the miraculous catch of 153 fishes. The article is divided into four main scenes (vv. 1-3; vv. 4-6; vv. 7-8; and vv. 9-11) and investigates the critical narrative meaning of the engagement and interaction of main characters, Peter, the beloved disciple, and the risen Jesus. The emphasis is put on the characterization of Peter who engages in four different scenes in John 21:1-11. Peter lead the other six disciples on a fishing expedition(vv. 2-4), but they did not catch any fish that night. When the risen Jesus commanded them to cast the net on the right side of the boat, they caught a large number of fish. The beloved disciple recognized the miraculous catch of fish as a discerning sign pointing to Jesus on the beach, and delivers the confessional cry (“It is the Lord”) to Peter alone(21:7). Peter quickly wraps himself with his undergarment and jumps into the sea. The characterization of Peter (a bold leap-passion and action) and that of the beloved disciple (a confessional cry-perceptual faith) are not contrasting but cooperative toward the recognition and approach to the risen Jesus. Thus both disciples represent the ideal discipleship in Johannine community. The article emphasizes the role of Peter as a skillful missionary equipped with great power and care. Peter is the only disciple who obeys Jesus’ command (“bring some of the fish”) and draw the net, full of large fishes, 153, ashore without any damage on the net or losing any of the fishes by demonstrating his powerful missionary skill. The specific number ‘153’ also prophetically anticipates Peter’s missionary capability and accomplishment in a symbolic and historical representation for “catching men.” Peter’s powerful action in 21:11 implies his special role as a responsible leader for the Johannine community to bring people to Christ. For the mission and leadership of the community that exceeds the concerns and interests in John 1-20, the risen Jesus appears again to challenge his disciples (Peter) to draw the people and take care of them for the kingdom of God.

요한복음의 하나님에 대한 소고

김문현 ( Kim Moon Hyun ) 서울신학대학교 기독교신학연구소 2018 神學과 宣敎 Vol.53 No.-

요한복음의 하나님은 누구인가? 그 하나님을 어떻게 알 수 있는가? 많은 요한학자들은 이 질문을 주로 신학적인 관점으로 설명하고 있다. 본 논문은 요한복음 본문에 등장하는 하나님과 예수를 ‘아버지와 아들’의 상호관계성의 관점에서 인물성격을 분석하고 있다. 그 이유는 ‘예수를 보면 하나님이 보인다’는 관점이 ‘아들을 보면 아버지가 보인다’로 연결되기 때문이다. 요한복음 안에 하나님은 직접적인 등장인물로 나타나지 않지만, 요한복음 전체의 내러티브 맥락에서 하나님의 성격과 역할, 즉 참됨, 유일성, 초월성, 선재성, 영원성, 영광의 계시의 신학적인 특성들은 아버지와 아들의 상관관계를 통해 더욱 분명하게 제시된다. 하나님의 창조사역과 구원계획은 재창조자로서의 예수의 역할 속에 대변된다. 하나님과 예수의 상호관계성을 통한 신적인 계시의 공유는 그 예수를 믿는 자들에게 하나님의 생명이 주어지게 되며, 이는 요한복음의 저술목적을 분명히 드러내고 있다(20:31). 요한복음은 다양한 인물들이 등장하여 각각 독특한 성격을 드러내고 있다. 특히 예수의 신원과 역할을 이해하는 것은 영생에 이르는 믿음과 구원과 밀접한 관계가 있다. 하나님에 대한 이해는 예수를 통해서, 그리고 다양한 등장인물들과 관계성의 의미론적인 관점을 통해서 더욱 분명히 드러난다. 요한복음에서 예수의 역할에 대한 기독론과 구속론의 신학적인 담론의 배경은 하나님의 구원계획을 어떻게 이해하는가에 달려 있다. 하여 아버지와 아들로서의 상관관계에 따른 하나님의 생명과 구원을 제시하는 하나님의 계시는 다른 인간들에게 그 생명을 함께 누리는 기회를 제공하게 된다. This study aims to explain the characterization and role of God in John's Gospel. How can we understand the God as the character in John's Gospel? Many Johannine scholars have been answered the question mainly in various theological terms and discourses. Rather than focusing on describing the God Himself, this study focuses on the examination of the narrative interactivity and characterization between God as the Father and Jesus as the Son. It means this study shows that ‘to understand Jesus as the Son is to understand God as the Father’(Jn. 14:9). The theological aspects of God’s characterization, such as, truthfulness, uniqueness, transcendence, preexistence, eternity, and the revelation of glory are clearly manifested through the narrative interactivity between the Father and the Son. The creation activity of God is clearly represented with the role of Jesus as the recreator. The divine sharing of God's revelation with Jesus endows with the eternal life to those who believe in Jesus; this definitely points out the purpose of writing John’s Gospel (20:31). Owing to the interactive relation between the Father and the Son, the life and redemptive salvation of God can provide the graceful opportunity of sharing to others through the revelation of God.

헌법상 가능한 복지국가모델에 관한 일고찰

김문현(Kim Moon-Hyun) 한국공법학회 1992 공법연구 Vol.20 No.-

요한복음의 성령 이해

김문현(Kim, Moon Hyun) 한국복음주의신약학회 2012 신약연구 Vol.11 No.2

One of the critical questions in understanding the Spirit in John's Gospel is how we can interpret the nature and function of the Spirit-Paraclete that occurs in the Farewell Discourse (14:16, 26; 15:26; 16:7). Many Johannine scholars tend to understand the Spirit as throughly Christological; particularly, the Paraclete in the Farewell discourse is understood in the Christological perspective. The emphasis of the Spirit in Christological terms depends on its function as the replacement or substitute for the risen and departed Christ. However, the article surveys the contours of John's portrait of the Spirit that is closely interrelated to the Father. By this notion, the article attempts to argue that the primary role of the Spirit - including even the Paraclete sayings - that runs throughout the Gospel is the Father's life giving power as the Spirit of God. For a better understanding of the Johannine nature and function of the Spirit, the article focuses on the Spirit (Paraclete)'s relationship to Jesus, the risen Christ, the Father, and other characters including the disciples, the world, and etc. The interactive relationship between the Father and the Son should be dealt with carefully in balanced ways in John's Gospel to evaluate the nature and function of the Spirit. The emphasis of the life giving work of the Spirit as God's Spirit also indicates the forensic function of the Spirit's work of bearing witness to Jesus. Thus, the Paraclete's work of convicting the world in regard to sin, righteousness, and Judgement (16:7-9) also emphasizes God's distinctive activity and presence in the world. All in all, the article also attempts to sustain the Christological frame of the Spirit (Paraclete) but not at the expense of a theological perspective of the Spirit.

일렉트로 슬래그로 재용해한 Fe-22Cr-5Al 합금의 미세조직 및 고온 산화 거동에 미치는 첨가 원소의 영향

김문현 ( Moon Hyun Kim ),이정근 ( Jeong Keun Lee ),주대헌 ( Dae Heon Joo ),김명호 ( Myung Ho Kim ) 한국주조공학회 2002 한국주조공학회지 Vol.22 No.6

N/A The effects of alloying elements added on the microstructure and high temperature oxidation behavior of the electro-slag remelted Fe-22Cr-5Al alloy were investigated. The amount of casting defect was makedly reduced by the electro-slag remelting. The temperature oxidation reststance was greatly improved by the addition of Be and Zr.

요한복음 17장 어떻게 읽을 것인가?

김문현(Kim, Moon Hyun) 한국복음주의신약학회 2011 신약연구 Vol.10 No.4

The prayer itself (John 17) is not separated from the overall literary chiastic structure of Jesus' farewell discourse (John 13-17). Under the rubric of the structure, John 17 is parallelled with John 13, and is also a variation of the prologue section (1:1-18). The prayer is artistically constructed along with the threefold spiralling movement that is accompanied by the three different objects of Jesus' prayer: Jesus prays for himself (1-8), his disciples (9-20), and all believers (20-26). To understand the nature of Jesus' prayer, we must first understand the identity and the mission of Jesus in John 17. John's use of both narrative time and narrative space highlights the transcended consciousness that indicates a supra-human understanding of time and space. Within this structure, Jesus' prayer moves towards the climactic petition that is itself a literary unity emphasizing the unity among believers. The idea of unity(oneness) among believers is modeled on the unique and deep interrelationship of the Father and the Son. This paper mainly focuses on Jesus' vision for the church that Jesus envisages in John 17. The prayer convincingly shows that Jesus' mission is to seek the glory of God as the ultimate sacrifice (sanctification) through his crucifixion. Jesus' followers are likewise called to seek the glory of God through the unity among them by the name of God. By this, John 17 ultimately shows the vision of Jesus for the church.