RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        멀티모달 기반의 감성 조명 시스템

        권순민,정인범,Kwon, Sun-Min,Jung, In-Bum 한국정보통신학회 2012 한국정보통신학회논문지 Vol.16 No.4

        본 논문에서는 인간의 감성을 멀티모달 환경에 기반하여 인식하여 감성지수에 따라 조명의 색을 조절하는 감성조명 시스템을 구현하였다. 감성조명을 위하여 사용된 LED 조명은 친 환경적이며 고효율 및 긴 수명을 가지고 있다. 특히 LED 조명은 단일 조명구로도 다양한 색 표현이 가능한 장점을 가지고 있다. 인간의 감성을 보다 정확하게 판별하기 위하여 사용자의 얼굴 영상 정보와 및 각성 상태 정보를 동시에 사용하여 멀티모달에 기반된 감성지수를 산출하였다. 실험을 통하여 LED 조명 색감이 사용자의 감성지수에 따라 변화 되므로 기존의 조명들에 비하여 인간 친화적인 조명시스템을 구축함을 보인다. In this paper, human sensibility is measured on multi-modal environment and a sensitivity lighting system is implemented according to driven emotional indexes. We use LED lighting because it supports ecological circumstance, high efficiency, and long lifetime. In particular, the LED lighting provides various color schemes even in single lighting bulb. To cognize the human sensibility, we use the image information and the arousal state information, which are composed of multi-modal basis and calculates emotional indexes. In experiments, as the LED lighting color vision varies according to users' emotional index, we show that it provides human friendly lighting system compared to the existing systems.

      • KCI등재

        사법경찰관 작성 피의자신문조서에 대한 법정책과 대법원의 해석 방향에 대한 검토

        권순민(Kwon, Soon-Min) 조선대학교 법학연구원 2018 法學論叢 Vol.25 No.1

        여기에서는 사법경찰관 작성 피의자신문조서에 대해 매우 엄격하게 증거능력 인정 하는 것과 검사 작성의 피의자신문조서와 차별을 두는 형사소송법 규정과 당해 피의자는 물론 피의자와 공범관계에 있는 자에게 까지 이러한 차등을 연계하여 인정하는 대법원의 해석의 합리성에 대해 검토하였다. 사법경찰관 작성 피의자신문 조서의 증거능력을 다루고 있는 우리 형사소송법 제312조 제3항은 그 증거 가능성을 매우 제한적으로 규정하고 있다. 그것은 사법경찰관 그 자체의 불신이라기 보단 수사기관 입 장에 몰입된 수사편향성과 인권침해적 위험성을 염두에 둔 것으로 보인다. 같은 수사기관 임에도 검사작성의 피의자신문조서의 그것과 비교하여 더 염격한 이유는 검찰 그자체에 대한 법적 신뢰라기 보다는 인권옹호자와 객관 의무를 전제로한 차이를 반영한 것이라고 할 수 있다. 그런데 영상녹화제도와 조사자 증언제도의 등장한 이러한 기존의 법체계와 대법원 해석과 곳곳에서 충돌하고 있다. 이러한 충돌을 기존 체제에 다소 무리하게 도입된 이 두제도를 중심으로 혹은 전제로 해서 해석하기 보다는 인권침해 소지를 줄이고 지나치게 수사전략에 매몰되지 않는 입법적 정리와 법정책이 요구된다. I searched in to interpretation and legal policy and case law of supreme court about protocol of interrogation prepared by judicial police officer rules the admissibility very limitedly. According to Korean Criminal Procecdure Law Protocol concerning interrogation of a criminal suspect, prepared by any investigative institution other than a prosecutor, shall be admissible as evidence, only if it was prepared in compliance with the due process and proper method and the defendant, who was the suspect at the time, or his/her defense counsel admits its contents at a preparatory hearing or a trial(Article 312 (3)). This is applied to Protocol of accomplice interrogation prepared by judicial police officer according to Supreme Court judgment. It seems that it is rather minding the risks of human rights abuse as an investigative agency. Existing legal system appeared in Video Recording of criminal Suspect s statements and testimony by interrogating police officers are conflicting with the Supreme Court judgment occassionally. Rather than interpretating these two systems which are introduced by force or presupposing, reducing violation of human rights possession and it also requires legislative order and legal strategy which do not overly buried into the investigation strategy.

      • KCI등재

        피의자를 위한 국선변호인 제도 확대 적용에 대한 검토

        권순민(Kwon Soon Min) 한국형사소송법학회 2018 형사소송 이론과 실무 Vol.10 No.1

        The State-Appointed Counsel system prevents human rights violation and ensures the fairness of criminal process. According to Article 12 of Constitution of the Republic of Korea “Any person who is arrested or detained shall have the right to prompt assistance of counsel. When a criminal defendant is unable to secure counsel by his own efforts, the State shall assign counsel for the defendant as prescribed by Act. The State-Appointed Counsel system is used for the defendants at this present time. Exceptively, the state-appointed counsel to a Criminal Suspect are used only for Request for Warrant of Detention and Examination of Criminal Suspect, arrest, and Review of Legality of Arrest and Detention. In the process of Request for Warrant of Detention and Examination of Criminal Suspect, if a criminal suspect subject to examination has no defense counsel, the judge of the district court shall ex officio appoint a defense counsel. And in the process of Review of Legality of Arrest and Detention, when the arrested or detained criminal suspect is not represented by a defense counsel, Article 33 of Criminal Procedure Law shall be apply mutatis mutandis. But this system must promote extended application for the criminal suspect. German and United States are already conducting the State-Appointed Counsel for the criminal suspect. If we introduce this system for the criminal suspect, the right of defendant are ensured and it will be possible to maintain balance with the other rules of Criminal Procedure Law.

      • KCI등재

        연구논문(硏究論文) : 의식 없는 피의자에 대한 혈액채취와 영장주의

        권순민 ( Soon Min Kwon ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2011 법학논총 Vol.35 No.2

        Because compulsory investigation may arrogate fundamental human right gravely, criminal procedure law regulates requirement and process to it. Investigation agency and court have to keep to such due process. Especially when drunken driving suspect is fallen into unconsciousness, blood of suspect is important proof. Criminal investigation agency want to extract and use as evidence. In this case, investigation agency need warrant for her search and seizure without her consent. However according to Korean Supreme Court(98do968, 1999), criminal investigation can ask doctor and nurse to extract unconscious suspect`s blood and use as a evidence on the premise of doctor or nurse`s consent, not suspect running article 218 of criminal procedure law. However, this decision soil ideal of warrant principle. In warrant principle, investigation agency present the warrant to deprived person of the benefit and protection of the law because of such investigation. In order to protect suspect`s information, article 218 of criminal procedure law have to be interpreted strictly. Ultimately, legislation for extracting and using suspect`s blood as a criminal evidence is needed.

      • KCI등재

        연구논문(硏究論文) : 직무질문을 위한 유형력 행사의 요건과 한계

        권순민 ( Soon Min Kwon ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2012 법학논총 Vol.36 No.2

        This study review Korean Supreme Court`s case on police stop and questioning. Korean Supreme Court admits some forcing for police questioning under considering of Principle of Proportion. This suggestion of Court is based on try for activity of operation the police. However, there is no legal source that Court`s resolution. I think Court have to decide for liberty of civil, not criminal justice system when it is vague. I think under current the Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officer, it is impossible to exert some forcing for police questioning.

      • KCI등재

        연구논문 : 국민참여재판의 신청과 배제에 관한 연구

        권순민 ( Soon Min Kwon ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2014 법학논총 Vol.38 No.4

        Application and exclusion in citizen participation in criminal trials perform a function as filter to progress a citizen participation trial. Act on citizen participation in criminal trials guarantees defendant to have right to a participatory trial, as provided by this Act. However such case shall not proceed to a participatory trial, If a defendant does not want a participatory trial. So, A court shall inquire a defendant of an eligible case, in writing or by other means without exception, of whether a defendant desires a participatory trial. and the court shall ensure to assure a defendant of his/her right to a participatory trial to the maximum. A defendant shall submit a written statement, describing whether a defendant desires a participatory trial, within seven days from the date on which a duplicate of indictment is serviced. The Supreme Court admits defendant to submit her desires a participatory trial until preparatory proceedings for a trial are closed, or the initial proceeding of a trial begins for expansion of participation of defendant. It also shall not proceed to participatory trial if a decision to exclude is made pursuant to Article 9 (1) in this Act. According to Aricle 9 in this Act, a court may not decide to proceed to a participatory trial for a period beginning after an indictment is filed and ending on the day after the closing of preparatory proceedings for a trial in any of something cases. However the reasons for decision to not proceed to a participatory trial are so ambiguous. This regulations for decision to exclude should be amended clearly for activating the citizen participation in criminal trial.

      • KCI등재

        형사소송법상 조사자증언제도의 합리적 운영방안

        권순민 ( Soon Min Kwon ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2010 법학논총 Vol.34 No.2

        The investigation authorities`s statement in criminal procedure has made an entrance under the subject as for the principle of trial-centeredness. Realization of the principles of direct and oral proceedings is the core trial-centeredness and this principle has become the kernel directing post throughout the course of current criminal justice reform in Korea. However, practice of the trial has already become formalistic and skeleton. The protocol which contains a statement of a suspect prepared by public prosecutor or judicial police officer(investigation authorities) can effectively program the conviction of judges in advance. If the investigation authorities`s statement is used as one of various information(evidence) and is controlled by legal procedure that helps the judge convict, it can rather contribute to the formation of a rational conviction and ensure a fair trial. But I don`t think this system can make rational criminal justice. I don`t think this system can make rational criminal justice in our times, because in criminal procedure the investigation authorities`s statement can possibly cause problem that the defendant`s statement conducted in front of investigator can be as a evidence without difficulty. Besides devices to control this system is weak. Devices to check and control the investigation authorities`s statement are required to be strengthened beforehand and afterwards in criminal procedure.

      • KCI등재

        스트릿 댄서의 슬럼프 원인과 극복 방법에 대한 체험적 분석

        권순민(Kwon, Sun-Min),박성진(Park, Sung-Jin),안병주(An, Byong-Ju) 한국체육과학회 2017 한국체육과학회지 Vol.26 No.3

        The purpose of this study is to analyze the experiences and perceptions of street dancers about the slump, and to analyze the specific causes, physical and psychological conditions, and coping strategies. In order to accomplish this research purpose, 25 street dancers were interviewed. Based on the collected data, I analyzed in detail the actual slump experience of the street dancer, perception of the slump, the body and psychological state according to the slump experience, and how to overcome the slump. Specifically, the results of the study are as follows. The results of the study show that street dancers are all experiencing slumps and slumps can have a negative impact on street dancers, but there is a high perception that dancers will be more positive when overcome through continuous efforts to improve rest and skill can confirm.

      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼