http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : ( Fabio Vieira Teixeira ) (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
( Paulo Gustavo Kotze ),( Antonino Spinelli ),( Rodolff Nunes Da Silva ),( Ivan Folchini De Barcelos ),( Fabio Vieira Teixeira ),( Rogerio Saad Hossne ),( Idblan Carvalho De Albuquerque ),( Marcia Ola 대한장연구학회 2015 Intestinal Research Vol.13 No.3
Background/Aims: Postoperative endoscopic recurrence (PER) occurs in nearly 80% of patients 1 year after ileocecal resection in patients with Crohn`s disease (CD). Biological agents were more effective in reducing the rates of PER in comparison with conventional therapy, in prospective trials. The aim of this study was to compare the PER rates of biological versus conventional therapy after ileocecal resections in patients with CD in real-world practice. Methods: The MULTIPER (Multicenter International Postoperative Endoscopic Recurrence) database is a retrospective analysis of PER rates in CD patients after ileocecalresection, from 7 referral centers in 3 different countries. All consecutive patients who underwent ileocecal resections between 2008 and 2012 and in whom colonoscopies had been performed up to 12 months after surgery, were included. Recurrence was defined as Rutgeerts` score ≥i2. The patients were allocated to either biological or conventional therapy after surgery,and PER rates were compared between the groups. Results: Initially, 231patients were evaluated, and 63 were excluded. Of the 168 patients in the database, 96 received anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and 72 were treated with conventional therapy after resection. The groups were comparable regarding age, gender, and perianal disease. There was longer disease duration, more previous resections, and more open surgical procedures in patients on biologicals postoperatively. PER was identified in 25/96 (26%) patients on biological therapy and in 24/72 (33.3%) patients on conventional therapy (P =0.310). Conclusions: Inthis retrospective observational analysis from an international database, no difference was observed between biological and conventional therapy in preventing PER after ileocecal resections in CD patients. (Intest Res 2015;13:259-265)
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
