RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 駐韓美地上軍 撤收計劃과 韓美關係의 再調整

        李承憲 건국대학교 1978 學術誌 Vol.22 No.1

        The power structure in the four big powers surrounding the Korean Peninusula underwent changes, from late 1976 to early 1977, when the Carter administration came to power in the United States, the Hua Kuo-Feng system emerged in Communist China, the Fukuda cabinet was formed in Japan, and a new constitution was enacted and the Brezhnev system was strengthened in the Soviet Union. Consequently, these nations were likely to revise their foreign policies and military strategies, and the power relations among them and surrounding the Korean Peninula were also likely to undergo changes. At this stage, it became inevitable for Korea and the United States to readjust their relationship and policy lines amid severe internal discord. Since the advent of the Carter administration, the problem of the withdrawal of the United States' forces from Korea and the problem of applying human rights diplomacy and moral diplomacy to Korea have emerged as new issues. The reason why some tension was created in the Korea-United States relations was that sole differences arose in perception, policy direction and strategic conception under the transitional international situation, causing some discord to mutual adaptation. However, the two nations tried to distinguish what was right and what was wrong and endeavored to compromise in consideration of the obligation as an ally. As a result, the situation developed into a constructive direction which could be beneficial to the two nations. The movement of the Korean government and people opposing the hasty troop withdrawal without compensatory measures, the unilateral troop withdrawal without obtaining concessions from the Communists, and the prudent attitude prevailing within the United States military and the Congress exerted influence upon the Carter administration. At the end of a series of consultation, a Korea-United States joint statement concerning the planned withdrawal of the United States' troops from Korea was announced in July 26, 1977. As source nationals, several pagers and reports were summarily quoted in Part II. The essential parts are as follows. Dr. Kim Kyung-Won, a special assistant to the President of the Republic of Korea, emphasizes in his paper presented at the "Symposium on Northeast Asian Security" which was held at the Stanford Research Institute, Washington D.C., June 20-22,1977 : "Bound together as allies by common interests and shares ideals, we have nevertheless experienced our share of strains and stresses‥‥ The challenge we face today is how to cope with such tensions as are bound to arise from time to time. And what I should like to suggest is that we can most effectively deal with touch tensions if we can establish our relationships based on common interests, ideals and clear understandings regarding our differences as well‥‥ The emerging partnership between Korea and America should demonstrate to the world that genuine, creative friendship can he forged out of relationships that were originally based on one-sided need for help. It should also play a vital role in our joint efforts to build a more peaceful and prosperousworld." American Ambassador to Korea, Riehard L. Sneider, in his speech at the Korean-American Association dinner, December 12,1977, under the subject "Korea and the United States : A Changing Relationship," frankly pointed out : "We see before us the end of the American 'Big Brother' relationship with Korea. Our two countries have worked hard together to make possible a more balanced, equitable repationship‥‥ Cooperation barred on mutual interests must continue to be the focus of our relations, with each country responsive to the interests of the other, with each sensitive to the internal dynamisms and problems of the other. If we work together with mutual understanding and in a spirit of mutual accomodation, we can strengthen the friendship and cooperation that reflects our history, our ideals, and our hopes for the future." U.S. Army General Richard G. Stilwell, former commander-in-chief, United Nations Command in Korea,1973-76, stressed in his article 'The need for U.S. Ground Forces in Korea': "I hold that the withdrawal of ground forces from Korea, without major counterveiling concessions on the Communist side, will undermine the vitality of free Northeast Asia, exacerbate regional tensions, and greatly increase the risk of armed convict. Thus I contend that the continued forward deployment of those forces is essential to security on the Korean Peninsula, to the stability and forward programs of Northeast Asia, and to the maintenance of the United Spates position and credibility as the preseminent world power." "The 1977 Report on Korea" which the Carter administration submitted to Congress describes President Carter's decision to withdraw U.S. ground combat forces from the republic of Korea over a four-to-five year period and the factors on which the decision was based. It stresses the implications of the withdrawal decision for the deterrence of North Korean aggression, and for the preservation of stability in the Northeast Asia region, where U.S. security interests-and those of Japan, the Peoples' Republic of China and the Soviet Union-converge. The report further discusses the military balance on the Korean Peninsula, the modernization of Republic of Korea's armed forces and continuing U.S. security assistance to the country.

      • KCI우수등재
      • KCI등재

        Position Statement: Drug Holiday in Osteoporosis Treatment with Bisphosphonates in South Korea

        이승헌,공현식,김태희,박시영,신정호,조선욱,변동원 대한골대사학회 2015 대한골대사학회지 Vol.22 No.4

        Bisphosphonates have been widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis with robust data from many placebo-controlled trials demonstrating its efficacy in fracture risk reduction over 3 to 5 years of treatment. Although bisphosphonates are generally safe and well tolerated, concerns have emerged about the adverse effects related to its longterm use, including osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures. Because bisphosphonates are incorporated into the skeleton and continue to exert an anti-resorptive effect for a period of time after the discontinuation of drugs, the concept of a “drug holiday” has emerged, whereby the risk of adverse effects might be decreased while the patient still benefits from anti-fracture efficacy. As randomized clinical trial evidence is not yet available on who may qualify for a drug holiday, there is considerable controversy regarding the selection of candidates for the drug holiday and monitoring during a drug holiday, both of which should be based on individual assessments of risk and benefit. This statement will provide suggestions for clinicians in South Korea on the identification of possible candidates and monitoring during a bisphosphonate drug holiday.

      • 담수조건에 따른 염류-나트륨성 토양의 제염 효과

        이승헌,김경만,안열,Lee Seung Heon,Kim Kyung Man,An Yeoul 한국관개배수위원회 2004 한국관개배수논문집 Vol.11 No.2

        This study was carried out to obtain the desalinization effect of saline-sodic soils as water pending condition. Three soils with different salinity were collected and packed at 115000a pot. With artificial 1,000 mg/L water made of sea salt, three cases w

      • KCI우수등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼