獨逸民事訴訟法相의 財産明示保證制度 및 債務者 名簿制度에 관한 考察

沈重璿,李明雨 대한민사법학회 1991 민사법연구 Vol.1 No.-

製造物責任理論의 構想

沈重선 順天大學校 1982 論文集 人文社會科學篇 Vol.1 No.-

The products liability means the responsibility that a manufacturer has in the case of occurrence of damage for which he is responsible when the defects of the goods manufactured are found by which consumers or users can't help being infringed on, and it is also meant as the manufacturer's liability or the supplier's liability. It is a general aspect that the consuming public lead a life to buy, use, and consume the living necessaries under the modern economic system. And in this situation we can easily find many negative elements as following: the arbitrary tricks of wicked manufacturers and traders, the exaggerated advertisements and the defect of goods manufactured, with which the damage of consumers has no choice but to avoid making social problems. Now we are in the generation of national welfare as the first policy in the modern society, and so the public opinion can't emphasize the protection of the consuming public from such enchroachments too much. According to such public opinion and the social philosophy, our government enacted the protection law of consumers in 1980. But as the protection law of consumer is only to try to cover the prior or indirect remedial measure through administrative regulations, once the damage is occurred by the deficts of goods manufactured, the remedial measure after enchroachments are not yet unsatisfied to the people. Therefore the only civil law to which we should appeal under the legal order of our nation has no concrete provisions, which is a big problem. This paper is referred to the application of existing civil law about the porducts liability in the base of the interpretation of law. The applications of law are as followings: the application of article 750 of civil law in imputation of evidence responsibility, the anological application of article 758 of civil law which provided the structure liability, the diversion of vendor's warranty responsibility and the diversion of non-fulfillment of obligation etc.... But as the theory of interpretation of the existing civil law based on the principle of liability arising from negligence, since it itself has a certain limit, it should be settled with the theory of legislature based on the principle of no-fault liability.

日本에 있어서의 辯論 겸 和解와 訴訟促進

沈重璿,李明雨 순천대학교 사회과학연구소 1993 社會科學硏究 Vol.5 No.-

獨逸民事訴訟法上의 財産明示保證制度 및 債務者名簿制度에 관한 考察

沈重璿,李明雨 순천대학교 사회과학연구소 1990 社會科學硏究 Vol.3 No.-

Wenn ein Schuldner eine Schuld freiwillig nicht ausgleicht, wird die Schuld schlieβlich durch Zwangsvollstrekung ausgeglichen. Aber falls Schuldner sein Vermogen versteckt oder er es im Namen anderes Mannes u··bertragt, fa··llt es dem Glaubiger schwer, das Vermo··gen des Schuldners zu suchen. Es fuhrt zu Verlieren der Wirkung der Zwangsvollstrekung. In der ZPO, um die Entstehung dieser Unstande zu verhindern, gibt es das System des Offenbarungsversicherung, Laut des Glaubiger soll der Schuldner dem Gericht sein Verha··ltnis des Vermo··gens und den Inhalt der Vermo··gensrechtsabtretung inder bestimmten perioe anzeigen. Auf den Fall, daβ der Anzeige unwahrist, soll er nach der Ordnung bestraft werden. Und wenn der Schuldner in der bestimmten Periode nach dem Urteil des Gerichts die schuld nicht ausgleicht, wird Sein Name in dem Schuldnerverzeichnis, d.h. die schwarze Liste beschriben. Das Schuldnerverzeichnis kann von jedermann durch gesehen werden. Dadurch kann jedermann das Vertrauen des Schuldners untersuchen. Durch das artige System ist die Wirksamkeit des Urteils zu sichern. Der Inhalt dieser Arbeit ist denn wie folgt Komponiert. Ⅰ. Einleitung Ⅱ. Offenbarungsversicherung Ⅲ. Schuldnerverzeichnis Ⅳ. Die Charaktere u··ber die Offenbarungsversicherung und das Schuldnerverzeichnis in des Koreanischen Zivilprozeβrecht. Ⅴ. Schluβ

民法上의 使用者賠償責任에 관한 考察

沈重璿 順天大學校 1983 論文集 人文社會科學篇 Vol.2 No.-

Article 756 of the Civil Law prescribes the liability of compensation for damage which a master or a supervisor caused, in case that the employee causes the third person a loss in the course of his business, if the master or the supervisor couldn't testify the no-fault in selecting and supervising his employees. And so according to the above prescription, the master can't help assuming a sort of final liability caused from other persons. Lately most of large enterprises manage their business with an organic structure of employees, through which they are able to earn a large amount of profits, at the same time they are forced to include the unavoidable dangers in the managing business as well, the employees are generally weak in controling, improving and avoiding the labor conditions. To the damage caused in case of such occasions, the charge of master's vicarious liability is surely a fair treatment and so a victim can be goodly redressed the damage. This will be the spirit of legislation in accordance with the above article. However the identification of master's immunity in the Article 756, Clause 1st, and of master's right of claim for compensation to the emplovees in the same Article, Clase 3rd as well brings about the ambiguity in attributing the liability of business management. for such reasons the interpretation and application of the above Article should be paid the strict immunity, and the master's liability should be reached to the wide application. And by doing so the realization of business liability will be carried out. Furthermore the relation of employment between business and private labors has to be distinguished and with the different legislation from Article 756, it is believed the acceptance of the system of liability without fault is to be most reasonable.

賣渡人의 瑕疵擔保責任에 關한 考察

沈重璇 順天大學校 1984 論文集 人文社會科學篇 Vol.3 No.-

There has been frequent controvercies on the legal nature of the implied warranty of the seller. Recently the legal resposibility system of the warranty is popular view in Korea. On the process of reviewing the legal responsibility system of warranty, I studied the implied arranty system on the history and legislative examples of it, the legal nature and the various problems in the legal interpretation. As the popular theory, the legal responsibility system consists of the required conditions theory through the specific thing Dogma, it is said to make the nature and scope of the damage compensation restrict within the fiduciary interest. However since the implied warranty results from the sales contract, the contract agreement of party concerned should be the contents of supplying flauless thing. The article of 581 of the existing Civil Law stipulates the implied warranty in the sort things and recognizes the claim rights of supply of no-fault things. With the large purchase and frequency of the sort things, the modern society takes relatively the relationship between the specific things and non-specific things. In due consideration of points that the structural conditions and the attribution effects of the existing implied warranty attempt, I think it will be natural that the legal nature of implied warranty should be considered to be a kind of the default of an obligation. Now that the implied warranty is considered as a particular system of non-fulfillment of an obligation, the existing provisions of the implied warranty(Articles of 580, 581, 582) must be regarded as a special rules of the general provision(below Article 390) of non-fulfillment of an obligation. Furthmore in the theory of legislation, the rivision and supplementation of structural conditions and the attribution effects of the implied warranty system are to leave a desire to be reviewed.

上告審裁判機構의 擴張

沈重璿 순천대학교 사회과학연구소 1993 社會科學硏究 Vol.5 No.-

이해권고에 관한 일고찰

심중선 한국비교사법학회 1998 比較私法 Vol.5 No.1

日本의 民事上告制限

심중선 대한민사법학회 1999 민사법연구 Vol.7 No.-

許可上告制의 再檢討

沈重璿 대한민사법학회 1993 민사법연구 Vol.2 No.-