http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 최현덕 (검색결과 102 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
독일 시민사회에서 전개된 한국 민주화를 향한 연대 운동: 한국연대위원회(Korea Komitee, 1977-1994)를 중심으로
최현덕 민주화운동기념사업회 2023 기억과 전망 Vol.- No.49
The struggle against dictatorship and for democratization in South Korea was not only fought within the country itself during the 1960s, up to the 1980s, but it was also supported to a considerable extent by civil society solidarity movements of foreign civil societies and overseas Korean migrants, especially in the United State, Japan, and Germany. Previous research on South Korea's democratization process has mainly focused on domestic actors and internal dynamics, and it has not been so long since researchers began to pay attention to transnational components such as international solidarity movements. For a more comprehensive understanding of the history of South Korea's democratization movement, it is necessary to approach to it as a transnational process and to reconstruct its history accordingly. Among the three main groups that initiated the Korean democratization movement in Germany, namely, the Korean diaspora, the German church, and German civil society, this article focuses on the Korea Komitee as the representative organization among the German civil society groups in solidarity with South Korea. This paper intends thereby to lay the groundwork for a full-scale research to reconstruct the transnational history of South Korea's democratization movement in a more comprehensive manner.
-
Mainstream smoke level of harmful substances in korean domestic cigarette brands
최현덕,홍석호,조훈식,김형경,이진희,윤순병,허석,박형준 한국분석과학회 2018 분석과학 Vol.31 No.1
After signing the WHO FCTC in 2003, South Korea ratified the FCTC in 2005. This study was conducted to provide data on toxic constituents that can be used as useful information for the level of exposure to Korean smokers. Emissions data from five brands of cigarettes were tested under the ISO and “Canadian Intense (HCI)” smoking regimes, respectively. We conducted an analysis of 25 compounds containing nicotine, tar, carbonyls, phenolics, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and semi-VOC cigarette smoke. Tar and nicotine showed levels of 4.3 to 5.8 mg/cig and 0.4 to 0.5 mg/cig, respectively, which are within the range of tolerance presented in ISO 8243. In the case of carbonyls, formaldehyde was detected within a range of 8.2 to 14.3 μg/cig, and acetaldehyde was present within a range of 224.7 to 327.2 μg/cig under the ISO smoke regime. Crotonaldehyde was not detected under the ISO regime, and all of the carbonyls showed values 2.3 to 4.5 times higher under the HCI regime than those under the ISO regime. Catechol, which showed a level of 47.0 to 80.5 μg/cig under the ISO regime and 117.5 to 184.7 μg/cig under the HCI regime, was the highest constituent among the phenols. The amount of isoprene was 91.7 to 158.3 μg/cig under the ISO regime and 221.0 to 377.0 under the HCI regime. To summarize, most of the constituents showed a tendency to be detected at levels 2 to 4 times higher under the HCI regime than under the ISO regime. Above all, these results represent the first analysis in Korea from an independent institute of tobacco companies under accreditation of ISO 17025.
-
-
-
-
-
-
최현덕 대동철학회 2010 大同哲學 Vol.53 No.-
이 글은, 강원대학교 인문과학 연구소가 한국 연구재단이 지원하는 인문한국 사업의 일환으로서 수행하고 있는 “인문학 진홍을 위한 인문치료” 라는 아젠다의 핵심적인 개념인 ‘인문치료’를 소개하고 있는 최희봉의 논문에 대한 논평문이다. 인문한국 사업은 현 한국 연구재단의 전신인 한국 학술진흥재단이 ‘인문학의 위기’에 대응하는 한 가지 정책으로 도입한 지원 사업으로서, 2010년 대동철학회는 이 사업을 수행하고 있는 인문학 관련 연구소 다섯 곳을 추계 학술대회에 초청해 함께 인문학에 대해 성찰할 기회를 마련했다. 이 글에서는, 그간에 진행된 인문학 및 인문학 위기 담론을 염두에 두면서, 최희봉의 발제문에 담긴 다음과 같은 논점에 대해 토론하면서 논의의 심화를 위한 질문을 던진다. 첫째, 인문치료 사업 역시 ‘인문학의 위기’에 대응하는 한 가지 기획으로서, 현실에 개입하고자 하는 의지에 의해 진행된다면, 인문치료 사업은 인문학을 어떠한 방향으로 변화시키게 될지 그리고 그 변화는, 현재 “인문학의 위기”라 부르는 상황에 비추어 볼 때 얼마만큼의 해결이 될 수 있는가? 둘째, 인문학을 기반 학문으로 하고 있는 ‘인문치료’가, 의학을 기반으로 하고 태동한 ‘의료인문학’보다 더 인문학적이라고 할 수 있는 지점은 무엇인가? 셋째, 이론적 학술활동을 전제로 하고 있는 인문학의 사업으로 연구재단의 지원을 받고 있으면서 실천적 활동이 핵심이 되는 사업을 수행해가는데 있어서 생길 수 있는 제약, 연구재단의 평가체제에 대한 대책이 있는가? 넷째, ‘병’과 ‘치료’의 개념이 전제로 하고 있는 사고방식의 체계, 심신이원론적 인간관은 서구의 주류의학계에서 통용되는 것과 많이 달라 보이지 않는데, 여기에 관한 인문학적 성찰을 바탕으로 하는 대안의 모색이 필요하지 않을까? 다섯째, 인간의 마음을 치유하려는 ‘인문치료’의 노력이 심리치료와 다른 점이 무엇일까, 즉 모두가 인간의 마음을 치유하는 것을 목표로 하고 있고 인문학적 지식이 그 과정에서 원용된다고 했을 때, ‘인문치료’에 있어서 보다 더 인문학적 색채는 어디에서 어떻게 주장될 수 있는가? 이러한 질문들이 ‘인문학의 위기’가 거론되는 맥락에서 인문치료 사업이라는 실례를 통하여 인문학의 성격 및 의의를 보다 더 규명하는데 일조할 수 있기를 바란다. This Thesis is to discuss the article of Heebong Choi introducing the concept of 'Humanities Therapy' as the core concept of the research project of the Institute for Humanities & Sciences at the Kwangwon National Unviersity in the framework of the Humanities Korea Program supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea. The Humanities Korea Program was introduces as a counter-policy of the above foundation to meet with the situation defined as the 'crisis of humanities'. In October 2010 the Daedong Philosophical Associaltion invited five humanities institutes performing the research projects of the Humanities Korea Program to hold a symposium to reflect on the problems of humanities today. In this article I discuss several issues contained in the paper of Heebong Choi, being conscious of the context of the discourses on the humanities and the crisis of the humanities developped in the last twenty years in South Korea. Based on the discussions I raise the following five questions: (1) If the project of the 'Humanities Therapy' was launched as a counter-measure responding the 'crisis of humanities', in what extend or in what aspect it could offer a solution? Could it provoke a change of humanities itself? In which direction? (2) In comparison to the 'Medical Humanities' which has the medical sciences as its scientifical basis, does the humanities play more essential role in the 'Humanities Therapy'? In what sense? (3) The humanities projects supported by the National Research Foundation has the assumption of the humanities as theoretical activity. However, the 'Humanities Therapy' has its place in the 'praxis'. Is there a counter-measure for a possible conflict caused by the different notions of the activities of humanities. Could it cause an excessive burden to the staff due to the competitive evaluation system of the research foundation? (4) The system of the conception presupposed in the concepts of 'disease' and 'therapy', especially the view of the human beings based on the mind-body-dichotomy seems not so much different as that of the Western orthodox medicine. Isn't it necessary to develop an alternative based on humanistic reflections? (5) What is the difference between the 'Humanities Therapy' and the psychotherapy? Where can we find the aspects more rooted in the humanities in the 'Humanities Therapy'? These questions are intended to deepen the discussion on the humanities in the face of the situation of the 'crisis of humanities'.
-
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
