[교회여, 청년을 살려라] 청년사목 성공의 핵심적인 4키워드 : 첫째 키워드 `공동체`

최준규 미래사목연구소 2016 사목정보 Vol.9 No.2

생부의 친생부인권과 임시출생신고에 관한 입법론

최준규 한국가족법학회 2024 가족법연구 Vol.38 No.1

In this article, the author proposes legislation that would recognize the biological father’s right to deny paternity for a child born within wedlock, and allow the biological father to seek a provisional birth registration for such a child. The main points of the proposed legislation can be summarized as follows: On the biological father’s rights to deny paternity: 1. Ⓐ Within 2 years from the date of the child’s birth, or Ⓑ within 1 year from the date the plaintiff discovers that he is the biological father, provided there is no social parenthood between the legal father and the child, and if the adult child consents to the denial themselves, the biological father may file for the denial of paternity against the legal father and the child/the mother with parental authority. 2. Although the above requirements are met, the court may dismiss the biological father’s request for denial of paternity if such denial significantly harms or is likely to harm the welfare of the child. 3. Any person who files for denial of paternity while aware that he is not the biological father will be subject to criminal punishment. On the provisional birth registration by biological father of the child: 1. The biological father who has already filed for denial of paternity may apply for a provisional birth registration listing himself as the father of the registered child, by attaching test results conducted through scientific methods proving that he is the biological father. 2. A provisional birth registration has the same effect as a formal one, except for matters regarding the child's legal father. Even if a provisional birth registration is made listing himself as the father of the registered child, the child’s legal father remains the mother’s husband until the court’s judgment denying the presumed paternity of the husband, and confirming the biological father's acknowledgment of his paternity is finalized. 3. Upon finalization of the judgment in the lawsuit filed by the biological father for denying paternity, or termination of the legal proceedings for other reasons, the legal father and mother responsible for the birth registration, and the biological father who applied for the provisional birth registration are obligated to correct the provisional birth registration in accordance with the final judgment or parental law.

경기도 사회적경제지원센터 설치 방안 연구

최준규,이현우,신이수 경기연구원 2019 정책연구 Vol.- No.-

The purpose of this study is to diagnose the operational performance of Gyeonggi–Do Ddabok Community Support Center and to suggest an appropriate way of establishing a new Gyeonggi–Do Social Economy Support Center as the vision and goal of Gyeonggi–Do‘s social economy policy changing. This study investigates the concept, function and role of an intermediate support organizations and illuminates them within the context of public policy delivery system. Especially, this study compares the characteristic of some legal and administrative form of the intermediary organization, which includes from a public management under local government, contracting-out, foundation to a private organization. Additionally, this study suggests that social deliberation will be needed when considering the new Center establishment as a juridical foundation for its sustainable development.

Abolition? or Permanent Legislation? Recent Discussions on the Corporate Restructuring Promotion Act

최준규 서울대학교 아시아태평양법연구소 2019 Journal of Korean Law Vol.18 No.2

The sixth Corporate Restructuring Promotion Act (CRPA) was re-enacted as a temporary law effective for five years on October 16, 2018. As an out-of-court debt restructuring scheme, CRPA procedure is governed by the principle of majority or super-majority, not unanimity. Thus, under the CRPA, the claims of the dissenting creditors are subject to a restructuring plan when the council of financial creditors adopts one. Dissenting financial creditors who do not wish to be bound by the resolution can demand that their claims should be purchased. If they do not exercise this right of appraisal, they must follow the restructuring plan, according to which they may be forced to extend additional financing to the distressed company. Out-of-court restructuring schemes are still important because they can contribute to the early and preventive corporate restructuring. Furthermore, most distressed companies prefer out-of-court proceeding to a formal insolvency procedure supervised by the courts, because it can have a relatively minimal impact on the credit rating and trading reputation of the distressed company. CRPA procedure can also hinder the opportunistic behavior of creditors, which is the main problem of the workout procedure governed by the unanimity principle. The social harmfulness of the CRPA has not yet been proved. The CRPA increases the restructuring options from which the distressed companies can choose. Therefore the CRPA should be maintained and made as a permanent law instead of being abolished, and some amendments do need to be added. To strengthen the fairness of the procedure and the private autonomy of creditors, a process of confirming restructuring plans governed by the courts should be introduced, and any additional financing should be left to the voluntary wills of the creditors. Finally, to promote new financing in the CRPA procedure, the protection of additional voluntary financiers should be reinforced.

특집 : 환경영향평가 교육의 필요성 및 기본방향

최준규 한국공학교육학회 ( 구 한국공학기술학회 ) 2001 공학교육동향 Vol.8 No.3

유류분과 신탁

최준규 사법발전재단 2015 사법 Vol.1 No.34

Forced Share and Trust Choi, Joon-kyu This article examines: ① the means of calculating forced share; ② the subject matter of a forced share; and ③ the party against whom to claim for a forced share, in case where either an inter-vivos trust for will substitute, a testamentary trust, or a trust with successive beneficiaries is established. The main conclusions are as follows. First, as a contract for the benefit of a third party, an inter-vivos trust for will substitute is often substantively a gift mortis causa granting beneficial interest in trust to a beneficiary. As such, it is reasonable in principle to include the value of the beneficial interest in the base property in calculating forced share, and allow the holder of forced share to claim for the return of forced share against the beneficiary, by way of claiming the transfer of beneficial interest. However, in cases where there is no beneficiary in trust or where it would be manifestly unfair for the holder of forced share to be allowed only the beneficial interest, the successor entitled to forced share may claim for the restitution of trust estate against the trustee. In such cases, the value of trust property should be included in the base property in calculating forced share, regardless of the point at which the revocable inter-vivos trust was established. Second, where a testamentary trust is settled, it is reasonable to allow both the restitution of trust estate and the transfer of beneficial interest in trust. As the trust property belongs to inheritance estates in case of testamentary trust, the successor entitled to forced share may claim for the restitution of trust estate against the trustee. Forced share guarantees successors some portion of inheritance estates. But in view of the substance of a testamentary trust as a bequest granting beneficial interest in trust to a beneficiary, the holder of forced share may also claim for the reversion of the beneficial interest. Third, where a trust with successive beneficiaries is established, the value of beneficial interest of the second, successive beneficiary should also be included in the base property when calculating forced share. The successor entitled to forced share has a claim against not only the first beneficiary, but also the second, successive beneficiary for the transfer of future beneficial interest. 이 글에서는 유언대용신탁, 유언신탁, 수익자연속신탁의 경우 ① 유류분 산정방법, ② 유류분 반환대상, ③ 반환청구의 상대방을 검토하였다. 필자의 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 유언대용신탁은 제3자를 위한 계약으로서 수익자에 대한 사인증여의 실질을 갖고 있는 경우가 많다. 따라서 원칙적으로 수익권의 가치를 유류분 산정의 기초재산에 산입하고, 수익자에 대한 수익권 이전청구 형태로 유류분 반환청구를 허용함이 타당하다. 다만 수익자가 존재하지 않거나 위와 같은 방식이 유류분권자에게 현저히 부당하다는 등 특별한 사정이 있는 경우, 수탁자에 대한 신탁재산 이전청구 방식으로 유류분 반환청구를 할 수 있다. 이 경우 신탁재산의 가치는 신탁재산 이전시기를 불문하고 유류분 산정의 기초재산에 산입되어야 한다. 둘째, 유언신탁의 경우 수탁자에 대한 신탁재산 이전청구와 수익자에 대한 수익권 이전청구를 모두 허용함이 타당하다. 유언신탁의 경우 신탁재산이 상속재산에 포함되므로 신탁재산 반환을 구할 수 있고, 유언신탁의 실질이 수익권의 유증인 점을 고려해 수익권 반환도 허용할 수 있다. 셋째, 수익자연속신탁의 경우 제2 수익자의 수익권 가치도 유류분 산정의 기초재산에 산입해야 하고, 유류분권자는 제2 수익자에 대하여 장래 발생할 제2 수익권의 반환을 구할 수 있다.

환경영향평가 교육의 필요성 및 기본방향

최준규,Choi Jun-Gyu 한국공학기술학회 2001 공학교육과 기술 Vol.8 No.3

사회혁신의 새로운 도구, 마을정책플랫폼

최준규,신이수 경기연구원 2019 이슈&진단 Vol.- No.372

지방의회 의정비 운영개선에 관한 연구 : 월정수당 및 의정활동비를 중심으로

최준규 한국지방재정학회 2021 한국지방재정학회 세미나자료집 Vol.2021 No.12

주민주권 실현의 첫 걸음, 주민자치회

최준규,윤소은 경기연구원 2021 이슈&진단 Vol.- No.483