http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
최성경,원성호 한국유전학회 2014 Genes & Genomics Vol.36 No.5
Recent investigations such as a more powerfulquasi-likelihoods score test (MQLS) statistic have enabledthe efficient association analysis with related samples. Although those approaches are robust against the misspecifiedphenotypic distribution and covariance structure,it has been shown that MQLS statistic becomes violatedunder the presence of the population substructure if thelevel of population substructure depends on the genomiclocation. In this report, we propose a new statistical methodwhich combines EIGENSTRAT approach and MQLS-statistic. The proposed method was evaluated with simulationdata under various scenarios and we found that proposedmethod performs better than the traditional methods suchas transmission disequilibrium test. The proposed methodwas applied to genetic association analysis for body massindex with Framingham heart study, and we found thatrs1121980 and rs9940128 in the linkage block in FTO geneare associated with the body mass index.
최성경 한국식품영양학회 2002 韓國食品營養學會誌 Vol.15 No.3
User satisfaction is the most critical criteria in measuring information systems success or failure. In this study. Contract Foodservice Information Systems were evaluated with user satisfaction instrument based on previous work. A total of 70 Contract Foodservice Information Systems users was surveyed. The status of building area of Contract Foodservice Information Systems was more in foodservice management (M=3.74), but less in producing (M=2.53) and purchasing (M=3.02) management. The users recognized accuracy of information (M=4.27), lasting educational services on systems (M=4.34) and increasing work productivity (M=4.42) as the most important factors and they also recognized it was important factors to build systems such area database management, menu management, purchasing and producing management and foodservice management (p<0.1).
재난·안전 주거환경 조성을 위한 주거복지 서비스 - 화재 및 감염병 예방·대응을 중점으로 -
최성경,문정민 한국주거학회 2020 한국주거학회 논문집 Vol.31 No.3
주거는 일정한 위치에 자리하여 삶을 영위하는 공간으로써 물리적 요소로써 주택과 사회적 관계로써 가족이 결합되어 이루어지는 생활환경이다. 현재의 주거복지는 취약계층의 주거문제 해결을 위해 주택공급, 주거비 금융 지원에 많은 비중이 치중되어 왔다. 하지만 한국의 주택 보급률은 이미 100%를 넘어서 양적 공급이 해소된 시점에서 현재는 주택건설과 공급을 넘어서 주거의 안전성 확보와 국민 주거의 질적인 삶을 향상시키는 주거복지로 전환하고 있는 과정에 놓여있다. 주민의 입장에서 주거안전이란 생활안전을 넘어 재난과 전염병 등 다양한 위험상황에 대응할 수 있는 포괄적 개념으로 이해해야 한다. 현대사회의 주거환경과 생활 속에 산재되어 있는 여러 위험과 취약성으로부터 주민의 안전성을 확보하여 피해를 예방하고, 피해발생 이후에도 자생적 회복이 가능한 주거환경과 커뮤니티를 구성하는 것이 중요하다. 이를 위해서는 물리적으로 안전한 주거환경을 바탕으로 주민과 지역 커뮤니티가 협력하여 모든 위험요소를 관리하고 능동적으로 대응할 수 있는 통합적인 주거 시스템 구축이 필요하다. Housing space is one of the physical factors which provides stable life and living space for family as social relationship. Housing welfare is mostly focused on financial support or housing residence supply for the vulnerable class to deal with their housing related problem. However, the rate of housing supply is over one hundred percent, which means that quantitative problem of housing supply is alleviated. Therefore, it is the stage of changing to housing welfare to improve quality of living for people and to secure housing safety. For residents, housing safety is considered as comprehensive concept for responding to a variety of dangerous situation such as disaster or infectious disease in addition to life safety. Thus, It is important to prevent damage by securing safety of residents from many dangerous factors and vulnerable factors hidden in living space of modern society, and to build community and housing environment which can recover itself after disaster happen. For this, it is necessary to build integrated housing system for managing and actively responding to dangerous factors with cooperation of local community and residents, based on physically safe housing space
성전환자의 성별정정 허가기준과 그 입법적 제안 : 대상결정: 대법원·2011.9.2.자 2009스117·전원합의체 결정
최성경 한국가족법학회 2013 가족법연구 Vol.27 No.1
This paper is about the legal standards for the "sex correction" of transsexuals on the National Family Registration. A significant case regarding this issue was decided at the Supreme Court recently. In this case, the applicant has suffered from disorders of sexual identity for a long time. She has believed that she is a woman and the people around her have recognized her as a woman because she has put on the woman's clothing. But she was registered as a man because she was born a man. After receiving several psychiatric treatments to overcome her sexual disorders, she made up her mind to maintain her psychological sexual orientation. Finally, she had a sex reassignment surgery and mammoplasty on Aug. 8. 2006 in Thailand. After the operation, she has undergone the estrogen therapies. In the meanwhile, she was married on Oct. 21.1992 and had a baby on Nov. 8. 1994, but got a divorce. Afterwards, she petitioned the sex correction on the National Family Registration from male to female. The Supreme Court rejected it for these reasons. First, the Civil Law only permits marriage between different sex, even though there is no way for the government to intervene in identifying a person's sexual orientation who lives his or her social lives as a different sex after a sex reassignment surgery with others' recognitions. The government's permission on the sexual correction of the transsexuals especially during their marriage can be regarded as the acceptance of the same-sex marriage. It may cause an unconstitutional influence on the sociolegal status of the spouse. Furthermore, when a transsexual has children underage, the government should consider the welfare of minors when judging the sex of the parents. If the correction of sex is permitted, minors are supposed to face a psychological disorientation, and may undergo possible social discriminations and prejudices during their sensitive juvenile period because their parents' sex on the registration shows the marriage between same sex. The writer evaluates this Supreme Court decision introducing the theories on the sexual transformation and the correction of sex. Considering recent trends of other courts and legislations, she suggests an unbiased legislation policy for transsexuals. Marriage status and possession of a minor child should not be the decisive standard for a sex correction. First, this study suggests that the legal provides could be that if someone in marriage is to request the correction of sex, they should file a divorce or be in divorce. Second, minors do not suffer from a mental disorientation because of the display of their parent's transformed sex. Under the current system, minors cannot approach the legal registration of sex, so they will not have the related information. Moreover, their mental hurts that come from the changes of the parents' appearance will be much bigger than those from information regarding sex change on the registration. We have to understand that minors will not suffer from the mental confusion if they are accustomed to the sexually changed parents. Thus, the impact on a child from the parent's sex change on the registration may not be so serious. For an idea of a statutory change, the writer suggests the removal of the sex registration. If we remove the sex/gender blank from the National Family Registration form, the history of the sex correction will not be uncovered.
가족관계의 변화와 젠더 - 캐나다 Civil Marriage Act(2005, c.33)의 법 형성 과정을 중심으로 -
최성경 한국민사법학회 2010 民事法學 Vol.51 No.-
There has been a lot of modifications in Family Law in Korea. Recently, there was reform of Family Law and accordingly ‘Act on Registrations of Family Relations' are in effect since first of January in 2008, and a ‘Family Register Act' has been reformed and valid since ninth of November in 2009. This reflects the legislative efforts to meet the changes requested by our society. There has been exception, though, it is the area of same sex marriage. The prejudice against homosexual love makes same sex relations difficult to get into legislative system. The tendency to consider the legislation for same sex relations as fostering them makes it difficult. The problem of same sex couples is the inclination of sex, though, so the enactment does not increase the same sex couples. It only discloses them. It is not the concern of this study that if same sex couples are right morally. This only turns attention to their existence though there is no legislation for them. Then at this moment when they are in existence and participating in society, I wonder if it is right to ignore the enactment on same sex couples. This study is to introduce ‘An Act Respecting certain Aspects of Legal Capacity for Marriage for Civil Purposes(Civil Marriage Act, S. C. 2005, c. 33.)' which has endowed legislative solution on same sex marriage in Canada. Civil Marriage Act was enacted on 20th of July in 2005 in Canada. This was to provide legislative solution to otherwise divided opinions on same sex marriage. After series of debates on status by law of same sex couples socially and lawfully since supreme court had judged constitutional coverage should be extended to same sex couples in 1999, federal council made a decision to exclude the segment of ‘male and female' from the traditional concept of marriage in only 6 years. The study on law systems in Canada is scarce despite its close relationships to Korea both socially and nationally. Furthermore though Canada was fourth nation to make same sex marriage legal in 2005, this was not known widely in Korea. So, this study was intended to introduce Civil Marriage Act in Canada and contemplate issues on same sex marriage. Even though the legislative decision in Canada cannot be applied directly to Korean law system due to the differences in law and enforcement systems, the decisions of court and enacting processes can provide references. In this way, this study is intended to provide informations on repairing and applying law system in Korea through evaluations on enactment of Civil Marriage Act, progresses on judicial decisions in Canada and issues on same sex marriage as progresses on law theory were made.
상속법상 법률행위와 채권자취소권: 상속의 승인·포기와 포괄적 유증의 승인·포기를 중심으로
최성경 법조협회 2007 法曹 Vol.56 No.9
상속의 승인포기와 포괄적 유증의 승인포기의 경우, 채권자취소권의 외관상 요건을 갖추게 되면 일반적인 사해행위로 인한 책임재산의 변경과 마찬가지로 채권자취소권을 행사할 수 있다고 할 것인가. 아니면 상속의 승인포기나 포괄적 유증의 승인포기의 특수성으로 인해 다른 판단이 필요한 것인가.이 문제의 검토를 위하여 상속의 승인이나 포기의 채권자취소권 행사가능여부에 대한 문제 상황을 제시한 후 구체적인 판단을 해 본다. 다음으로 상속과 상당부분 공통점을 가지고 있는 포괄적 유증의 승인포기와 채권자취소권의 문제를 살펴본다. 그리하여 우리민법이 상속인의 의사자유를 존중하여 제도화한 승인과 포기를 채권자취소권의 형식적인 요건을 갖추었다고 해서 취소할 수 있게 할 것은 아니라는 것, 다만 예외적으로 법정승인의 일정한 경우에는 채권자취소권을 인정할 수 있도록 해야 할 것이라는 결론을 얻는다. 포괄적 유증의 경우에는 포괄적 수증자가 상속인인 경우와 상속인이 아닌 경우로 나누어, 상속인인 경우에는 상속의 승인이나 포기의 경우와 같이 판단하고, 상속인이 아닌 경우에는 승인의 경우에는 채권자취소권을 행사할 수 있지만 포기의 경우에는 채권자취소권을 행사할 수 없다는 입장을 밝힌다. * 논문접수 : 2007. 7. 16. * 심사개시 : 2007. 8. 7. * 게재확정 : 2007. 8. 27.