http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 장동철(Dong-Chul Jang) (검색결과 7 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
장동철(Dong Chul Jang) 한국공공정책학회 2004 공공정책연구 Vol.15 No.-
Under similar initial condition of economic, social and cultural circumstances, Korea and Taiwan could expand their exports and achieve the high performance of economic growth in the process of export-oriented industrialization. In Korea, they let big firms primarily undertake the export, expecting the economies of scale, and faced the structural inequilibrium at the cost of economic growth. However, Taiwan let the small firms mainly undertake the export and made a rapid economic development without any cost of unequal structure. After all, it is necessary to avoid the excessively artificial policy ignoring the market mechanism in excecuting trade policy.
-
-
-
-
-
張東喆 건국대학교 1977 論文集 Vol.5 No.1
A classical school and scholars like J. Viner and G. Haberler among modern scholars says that international division based on the principle of comparative production cost is still useful for underdeveloped countries. They contends a country which has the comparative advantage of agriculture doesn't need to seek industrialization with sacrifice of agriculture, but must specialize in agriculture. In contrast with this R. Nurkse and R. Prebisch oppose to traditional trade theory and inisist the industrialization of underdeveloped countries. Owing to decreasing demand of the primary product of underdeveloped countries and protection policy of developed countries, they believe that they cannot expect the economic development through agriculture specialization. I think Nurkse' and prehisch's industrialization theory is more realistic in overpeopled backward countries. Because the traditional international trade theory supposing general equilibrium under perfect competitution and perfect movement of factors among industries is not suitable to underdeveloped countries which unemployment is serious, and the importance of dynamic factors is large. In this way if the industrialization of underdeveloped countries is inevitable, which way is more desirable, balanced growth or unbalanced growth? When we think over the situation that capital and resources are insufficient in underdeveloped countries, I think the method of Hirschman's unbalanced approach is more realistic. Even so, in underdeveloped countries which linkage effect among industries is small, the effect of the development of one leading sector may not spread over other industries and bring about the waste of resources. Accordingly it is difficult to try only unbalanced growth.
-
ScienceON연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
