한국형 원전의 부흥을 위해 진짜 필요한 것

임명현 (사)방송기자연합회 2011 방송기자 Vol.3 No.-

공익서비스보상법제에 관한 연구

임명현 한국법제연구원 2008 법제연구 Vol.- No.34

Recently, the new government inaugurated this February has announced a plan to privatize some state-owned enterprises like electronic, gas, water, transportation etc. Privatization refers to transferring ownership of business from the public sector to the private sector. Private market actors can more efficiently deliver many goods or service than government due to free market competition. However, market interactions are all guided by self-interest, and successful actors must be committed to providing only profitable area and class charging the maximum price that the market will bear. Therefore, when privatizing, there is the need for responsible stewardship of social support missions. Public service obligations are any obligation imposed upon an enterprise to take all necessary measures to ensure the provision of a service satisfying fixed standards of continuity, regularity, capacity and pricing. They incur loss to privatized company. So to carry out privatization, it is firstly settled how to compensate the possible loss accompanying public service obligations. Recently, the new government inaugurated this February has announced a plan to privatize some state-owned enterprises like electronic, gas, water, transportation etc. Privatization refers to transferring ownership of business from the public sector to the private sector. Private market actors can more efficiently deliver many goods or service than government due to free market competition. However, market interactions are all guided by self-interest, and successful actors must be committed to providing only profitable area and class charging the maximum price that the market will bear. Therefore, when privatizing, there is the need for responsible stewardship of social support missions. Public service obligations are any obligation imposed upon an enterprise to take all necessary measures to ensure the provision of a service satisfying fixed standards of continuity, regularity, capacity and pricing. They incur loss to privatized company. So to carry out privatization, it is firstly settled how to compensate the possible loss accompanying public service obligations.

공영방송 보도의 공정성 저해 요인에 관한 연구: 언론통제 메커니즘의 관점에서 KBS 사례를 중심으로

임명현 (사)방송기자연합회 2018 방송기자 Vol.40 No.-

17대 국회 아동관련 법제 현황 및 시사점

임명현 한국입법정책학회 2007 입법정책 Vol.1 No.1

[기자협회장 대담] 2017 총파업, 왜 우리는 다시 일어섰는가?_KBS 박종훈 기자, MBC 왕종명 기자

임명현 (사)방송기자연합회 2017 방송기자 Vol.38 No.-

유전자 알고리즘을 이용한 침입 패턴 인식에 관한 연구

임명현,김판구 조선대학교 전자정보통신연구소 2001 電子情報通信硏究所論文誌 Vol.4 No.2

Many methods about IDS have been presented today. But, pattern of intrusion which is the most significant has not been defined clearly. With this fact, a study of pattern detection on unknown anomaly behavior is not sufficient. In this paper, we define DNA SEQUENCE as system calls of application so as to distinguish patterns of normal intrusion behavior. We measure degree of similarity with defined system calls and receiving module using genetic clustering algorithm. We can check out whether the patterns of system call are similar with established normal patterns. If the patterns escape from scope of similarity, the intrusion detection system report the event to system supervisor. System supervisor analyze reported intrusion behaviors and concludes known intrusion or unknown anomaly intrusion. This method has an advantage, finding normal intrusion and established intrusion behavior at the same time. Established intrusion detection systems can distinguish known intrusion behavior, but as defining system call patterns of normal program in this paper, this system can report intrusion behavior. This is able to detect the second intrusion with detecting unknown intrusion behaviors than other systems.

색상기준표에 의한 설진 진료부 작성 10례 보고

임명현,이태현,오용성,김승모,박재현 대한한방내과학회 2002 大韓韓方內科學會誌 Vol.23 No.4

상부위장관 출혈의 치료방법에 대한 중의잡지 고찰

임명현,노회목,김승모,박재현 대구한의대학교 제한동의학술원 2001 東西醫學 Vol.26 No.2

입법관리의 실태 및 효율화 방안

임명현 한국법제연구원 2004 법제연구 Vol.- No.27

Legistics, the science of legislation, has for a long time dealt with the contents of laws and the legislative process in the ministries and Parliament. It’s activities, both in theory and practice, have recently begun to concentrate on democracy, efficiency and effectiveness of norms. There are two reasons for these developments. First of all, budgetary pressure, which calls for more rational and cheaper laws. Second, the neo-liberal philosophy of the slim state, reinventing government as small government, the State as an agent for the essentials and no more. Like OECD countries, both the National Assembly and the Government in Korea have introduced and operated a variety of devices designed to achieve democracy and efficiency of the legislation. But as this study shows, those devices have not been managed well enough both in quality and in quantity, mainly because they are not made by the principle of check and balance. To make the legislative process well working from the aspect of democracy and efficiency, this study shows some remedies like “Point of Orders”. “Cost Estimates for Bills”, “Legislative Evaluation”, and so on. But more impotently, there is need for introduction of top-down systems in law-making procedure like budgeting one, to enable standing committees of assembly to deliberate bills in broader prospective, for example, from the aspect of efficient distribution of scarce resources.

새로운 입법방식의 전략적 활용가능성 검토 - 사례(관광진흥법 일부개정법률)를 중심으로 -

임명현 한국입법정책학회 2016 입법정책 Vol.10 No.1

현대 국가에서 입법이 다양한 국가 정책의 목적 달성을 위한 수단으로 인식 되면서 입법의 방식도 다양한 정책 유형에 따라 다양한 방식으로 진화하고 있는데, 특히 오늘날과 같이 변화가 심한 동태적 입법환경에서는 기존의 일 반성과 추상성, 영속성을 특징으로 하는 전통적 입법방식 보다는 특정 지역 이나 사례에 한하여 한시적으로 우선 적용해 보고 그 효과성을 평가해 보는 한시적이고 실험적인 성격의 새로운 입법방식이 주목을 받고 있다. 입법자는 법률이 현실과 괴리되지 않도록 항상 관찰하고 적시에 개선해야하 는 의무가 있음에 비춰보면, 모든 법률은 한시적이며 실험적 성격이 있다고 볼 것이나, 이러한 일몰입법이나 실험입법과 같은 잠정적 성격의 법률은 처 음부터 법률조항에 한정적 사례에 대하여 한시적으로 적용하고 사후 평가조 항을 담는다는 점에서 그 특징이 있다. 이러한 새로운 유형의 입법방식은 전통적인 일반·추상적이고 영속성을 갖는 법률형식에 비해 법률관계를 영속적으로 확정짖지 않고 법적용에 있어서 한 시적이며 잠정적이고 경우에 따라서는 적용 집단도 한정적이라는 점에서 법 적 안정성에 취약하다는 한계가 있으나, 상황이 복잡하고 미래가 불확실한 동태적 환경에서는 입법실패를 최소화할 수 있고, 전통적 법률형식의 경로의 존성을 탈피하여 사후 입법개선을 용이하게 하며, 장래 법률효과에 대한 입 장이 첨예하게 갈리는 경우 정치적 합의를 가능하게 한다는 점에서 그 효용성이 있다. 이 글에서는 최근 개정된 직접 학교환경위생정화구역 내 관광호텔 진입규제 를 해제하는 내용의 관광진흥법 일부개정법률을 사례로 선정하여 새로운 입 법방식의 가능성을 살펴보았는데, 사례에서는 입법부작위의 부작용이 크기 때문에 시급히 규제를 해제하여 관광호텔 수급균형을 맞춰야 한다는 주장과 학생들의 학습환경이 침해될 우려가 크다는 입장이 팽팽하게 맞서다가 결국 은 법적용 대상을 객실 100실 이상으로, 대상지역도 서울과 경기도로 한정하 는 한편, 법률의 유효기간은 5년으로 하여 비로소 합의가 되었다. 사례에서의 입법 방식은 법률효과의 불확실성에 대응하여 적용범위와 적용 기간을 한정하고 있다는 점에서 전통적인 입법방식과는 상당히 차별화된 것 으로 평가되며, 처음부터 전면적 시행으로 인한 입법실패의 위험, 즉 학생들 의 교육환경권의 침해에 대한 우려를 최소화하는 한편, 정치적 합의를 통해 신속히 사회문제에 대응할 수 있도록 하는 등 그 유용성도 확인할 수 있었다. 다만, 새로운 입법방식의 유용성에도 불구하고 모든 법률을 한시적이거나 실 험적인 법률 형식으로 제정한다면 법적 안정성이나 입법의 경제성 측면에서 바람직하지는 않으므로 향후 불확실성이 크고 시급한 입법이 요청되는 등 일 정한 요건을 갖춘 경우에는 적극적으로 새로운 입법방식을 채택할 필요가 있다고 보았다. In this fast changing world, legislators or regulators are faced with high level of complexity and numerous uncertainties. These dynamic law-making conditions often do not allow legislators have full access to the forms of information or knowledge on the potential effects of their choice which are necessary for enacting more permanent laws. As a results, traditional laws characterized with generality, abstractness and permanency seem not only to be unable to keep up with the pace of rapidly evolving societies, but also to accelerate the risk of legislative failure when they are applied directly to the whole country. In dealing with situations of great uncertainty, new type of dynamic legislative instruments like temporary legislation limiting the applying group of the policy or including clauses like sunset, periodic oversight and evaluation may be proved to be more effective in improving the quality of legislation. For example, sunset legislation make it possible to reduce regulatory pressure by terminating unnecessary regulations or agencies. Likewise, experimental legislation enable legislators to gather important information regarding the nature of the underlying problem, and test new rules' effectiveness on a small-scale basis before their implementation is extended to the whole country. Of course, these temporary and flexible approaches will not solve all social problems, but if used as a subsidiary method, it can be a rational way of dealing with today's ignorance and risk society. This means lawmakers now confronting with a new social problems must decide if they employ traditional legislating methods or new problem-solving instruments like experimental legislation.