http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
논문(論文) : 은자(隱者) 왕국의 세상 엿보기 혹은 좌절된 접속: 1900년 파리세계박람회에 전시된 "세기말" 조선
육영수 ( Young Soo Yook ) 대구사학회 2014 대구사학 Vol.114 No.-
This paper tries to reappraise historical implications and legacies of Korea`s participation at l`Exposition Universelle de Paris of 1900. Insead of approaching the Exposition as a diplomatic affair and international power game, the author rediscovers it as a cultural event where politics of spectacles, propagation of consumerism, and mode of civilizing process overlapped and competed each other. Were there any significant differences between Korea`s participation at the Chicago Columbian World Fair in 1893 and Paris Exposition in 1900? What kind of stereotyped knowledge and (mis)perception did European countries had on a poor and isolated ‘hermit kingdom’ in the Far East, and vice-versa? Had the Korea`s involvement with the Paris Exposition left any positive impacts on its construction of national identity and modernization? These are major questions that the article endeavors to answer. The first half of the article summarizes how Korea`s opening to Western nations since 1883 contributed to ‘importing’ European cultures, reviews the peculiarities of French-Korea relations prior to the Exposition, and introduces persons who engaged during fin-de-siecle in cultural exchanges and mutual (mis)understanding between the two nations. The second half of the paper explains how French mass media appreciated the Pavilion of Imperial Korea, and criticizes the serious incompatibilities regarding the Exposition between Emperor Gojong`s praise and curiosity (‘from the above’) and almost absolute ignorance among ordinary Koreans (‘from the below’). As many volumes of Korean ancient texts which had been displayed at the Exposition and seized in France for long repatriated recently to their home land, author concludes that “the tales of two nations” entangled at the Paris Exposition in 1900 continue in global and transnational perspectives. (Chung-Ang University / waldo@cau.ac.kr)
육영수(Young Soo Yook) 한국서양사학회 2001 西洋史論 Vol.71 No.1
Psychoanalysis and History: Theory and Practice The article intends to introduce and keep trace of the origins, development, and characteristics of `psychohistory`, which is known as one of the most controversial areas of twentieth-century historiography, and which, however, remains and unexplored field of historiography in Korea. In order to examine how psychoanalysis and history merged to establish a new hybrid of scholarship, the author divides a life-story of psychohistory into two stages: the phase of experimental cohabitation between psychoanalysis and history, which stretches from the death of Freud to the early 1960s, and the phase of take-off and active admission of psychohistory, which took place in the 1970s and continues to the present. During the first stage psychoanalysts such as Wilhelm Reich and Eric Erikson carefully tried to apply some psychoanalystic concepts and models to the research of past, whereas during the second stage historians such as Peter Loewenberg and Lynn Hunt advocate the use of psychohistorical methods in studying historical figures(Hitler) and events(French Revolution) After presenting several case-studies by scholars mentioned above, the article also summaries and explains major issues regarding `Psychohistory: For and Against`, in which both psychoanalysts and historians such as William Runyan, Hans Meyerhoff, Frank Manuel, Peter Gay and Hans-Ulrich Wehler were involved. Reviewing and considering different opinions and perspectives on psychohistory, the author emphasizes that in spite of some dangers and limitations psychohistory can provide historians with useful and powerful tools in their approaching primary sources, shedding a new interpretation, and raising new questions over old familiar subject-matters. Thus, just as William Langer in his Presidential Address to the American Historical Association in 1954 called to the historical profession to engage seriously with psychoanalysis, the author concludes the article by inviting his fellow historians in Korea to pay open-minded attention to the potentials of psychohistory.