http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
변진석 한국지식정보기술학회 2011 한국지식정보기술학회 논문지 Vol.6 No.5
he present study is a part of a larger study and investigated whether power law of practice, which has been discussed in relation to skill acquisition, applies to the acquisition of automaticity in second language development in terms of reaction time, error rate, and length of time of speech. Fourteen native speakers of English participated in fourteen computerized learning, practice, and test sessions through DMDX, MS Word, Audacity, and Cool Edit over a 5-week period to learn three Korean morphosyntactic rules. The analysis of their performance indicated that overall the acquisition of automaticity in second language development followed a power law pattern. The findings are discussed in relation to their pedagogical implications for second language learners, who often give up the acquisition of automaticity easily.
변진석,김정태 한국지식정보기술학회 2011 한국지식정보기술학회 논문지 Vol.6 No.6
The development of web2.0 technology has contributed to language instructional design in terms of increasing interaction between learners and their motivation. Also the combination of web2.0 technology and storytelling activities would diversify instructional activities. A blended teaching method through the appropriate combination of both offline and online activities would enhance the effect of learning greatly. The blended teaching method is an instructional method that maximizes the effect of online instruction whose advantageis learner-centered repetitive and/or preview study free of the limitation of time and space and that of offline instruction whose advantage is direct interaction between the teacher and learners or between different learners. In designing such a blended English teaching method, integrating several web2.0 technologies such as Phrasr, Dumpr, Jaycut, Prezi, Dipity into offline teaching activities would surely increase learners 'interaction and motivation in learning.
Homestay: What Factors Contribute to Second Language Learning?
변진석,김정태 21세기영어영문학회 2013 영어영문학21 Vol.26 No.1
The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of homestay and contributing factors to second language learning of 13 Korean students in the U.S.A. They participated in 3 week summer homestay as a part of a 6-month TESOL certificate program in a U.S. university. They were given pre- and post-tests consisting of listening, speaking, reading, and writing. They were also required to complete a survey, journal, and storyboards about the homestay experience. The analysis results demonstrated that they tended to communicate with a certain member of the host family because of the person’s outgoing personality and that they were given proficiency-appropriate help for their English. There was an ignorable amount of score improvement in listening and reading. Speaking showed a small amount of score improvement and the fluency component of the speaking skill played an important role in elevating the score. Students acknowledged increased interaction with their American host families with their native country-related topics and current topics. The contexts that promoted interaction were mealtime, playing games, shopping with the host family, and helping the host family.
미국 헌법상 전쟁권에서 행정부와 의회의 권력분립과 충돌, 그리고 대법원의 판결 — 테러와 전쟁 사례 —
변진석 안암법학회 2009 안암 법학 Vol.0 No.30
본 논문은 미국의 헌법 하에서 대통령과 의회 사이의 권력분립이 테러와의 전쟁에서 어떻게 해석되고 적용되는지 분석하였다. 미국헌법은 전쟁관련 권한을 대통령에게 통수권을 부여하고 의회에 전쟁의 선포를 비롯한 다른 권한을 부여함으로써 다른 두 정치적 부서간에 분산하고자 하였다. 911사태 이후 미국의 행정부는 테러단체와 전쟁을 수행하는 것은 대통령이 헌법상 통수권을 행사하는 것이기 때문에 의회게 이를 제약할 수 없으며 대통령은 전쟁을 수행하고 승리하기 위해서 필요한 조치를 취할 수 있다고 주장하였다. 이에 대하여 미국 연방대법원은 헌법이 전쟁권을 의회와 행정부에 분산하여 부여했기 때문에 의회가 자신이 권한을 부여받은 영역에서 입법을 하는 경우 대통령은 이를 따라야 한다고 판결하였다. 본 논문의 결론은 대통령의 행동이 전장에서 직접 군사력을 운용하여 작전을 수행하는 것에 가까울 경우 이에 대한 의회의 제약은 인정받지 못할 것이며 반면 대통령의 행동이나 조치가 전장에서 멀리 떨어져 미국 국내문제에 주로 영향을 미치는 경우 의회가 입법으로 규정한 바를 대통령이 따라야 한다는 것이다. 그리고 이러한 양 극단을 기준으로 특정 대통령의 행동이 어느 쪽이 가까운가에 따라서 대법원이 합법 또는 불법으로 판단할 것이라는 것이 본 논문의 결론이다. This paper attempts to analyse how the separation of war powers between President and Congress was interpreted and applied when the US prosecuted the war against terror since 911. The executive department of the US government interpreted the US Constitution, particularly, the Commander in Chief clause, gave the power to wage war. Therefore, when and if Congress passes a law restricting President's power to wage war, it would be an infringement of President's power under the Constitution. The US Supreme Court, however, held in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld that because the Constitution gave war power to both President and Congress, the legislation by Congress, as long as it is within the area allowed by the Constitution, legimatedly limits President. Based on the analyses of the US Supreme Court's decision from early 19th century, this paper concludes that when Congress tries to regulate President's power to wage war in matters of pure military operations closer to combat field, the Court is likely to find the legislation unconstitutional while President's uses the war power to regulate domestic affair in order to help himself to wage war in foreign territories, the Court is likely find the President infringing either the power of Congress or civil rights of individual.