http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
백선희,조성우 한국영유아보육학회 2005 한국영유아보육학 Vol.0 No.41
This article analyzes factors that determine expenditure levels for daycare and education centers utilized by families with children under five years old. The following results are obtained : first, those households are mostly nuclear families, lower women's participation in the labor market, lower income than the average income of household living in cities. Secondly, 50% of those households use day care and education centers, and users expend costs as 11% of their income. Thirdly, using of daycare and education centers is affected by mother's age, whether employed or not, number of children and income. Also the expenditure levels is affected by mother's education background, number of children under elementary school in addition to above factors. Thus, we suggest to enlarge social support for low income families, working mothers, families with two children or more, families with infants or toddlers who have burden for children rearing costs. 본 연구는 육아비용의 사회적 분담 방안 모색에 필요한 실증적 근거를 제시하기 위해 한국노동패널 데이터를 활용하여 미취학자녀를 둔 가구의 특성과, 보육ㆍ교육비 지출수준 및 그 결정요인을 분석한 것이다. 노동패널 데이터를 연구의 목적에 따라 분석하여 다음과 같은 연구 결과를 얻었다. 첫째, 미취학자녀를 둔 가구는 대부분이 핵가족이고, 여성경제활동참여가 낮으며, 소득수준은 도시근로자 평균소득에 비해 낮다. 둘째, 가구의 50%정도가 보육ㆍ교육기관을 이용하고 있는데, 지출수준은 근로소득대비 평균 11%이지만, 소득이 낮을수록, 자녀가 어릴수록 부담이 크다. 셋째, 보육ㆍ교육기관 이용 여부는 모(母)의 연령, 취업, 미취학 자녀의 수, 근로소득이 영향이 미치며, 보육ㆍ교육비 지출 수준은 이외 추가로 모의 학력과 취학 자녀의 수가 영향을 미친다. 이와 같은 분석 결과를 바탕으로, 일률적인 육아비 지원보다는 육아비에 대한 부담이 큰 상대적 빈곤가구, 취업모 가구, 다자녀 가구, 영아가 있는 가구 등을 중심으로 비용 효과적인 육아비용의 사회적 분담방안이 모색되어져야 한다고 제안하였다.
사회복지 이념적 모형을 통해 본 김대중 정부의 아동보육정책 평가
백선희 한국영유아보육학회 2003 한국영유아보육학 Vol.0 No.33
The purpose of this study is to evaluate on the child care policy of the Kim Dae-Jung administration(1998-2002). This article classified welfare ideologies into residual welfare, corporate welfare and institutional welfare models. Perspectives on the child care policy is different each other: poverty policy, labour policy for women, child welfare policy. Generally, Child care policy has characteristics of human development(child development) and economic investment(Women's participating in labour market). That seems to be response to the productive welfare of DJ welfarism. But government did not adopt the child care as a crucial policy. As evaluating on subjects, objects, methods, deliverly systems and finances in the child care policy, this article describes that DJ's child care policy is located between residual welfare and corporate welfare.
백선희 서울神學大學校 2005 교수논총 = (A)collection of treatises Vol.17 No.-
The present age is changing; increasing nuclear families, divorce rates and dual-earner families. These are the main causes that the families are under difficult of rearing children. Also, Child care have became major social problem in crisis of low-birth rates and aging society in Korea. But our social care system for children is very poor, specially for elementary school children. Merely 9.4% children are covered social care service, 69.0% children rely on private institutes, 4.5% children are leaving alone at home without adult. Parents demand subsidy for children, public childcare agencies for the school aged and so on. But we don't have a good system for social care; service is not adequate from quantity or quality aspect, as well as delivery system is separated as 'After school care' of the Ministry of Family and Gender Equality, 'School based after school education' of the Ministry of Education and Human Resources' and 'Community children center' of the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Fortunately, we could meet some plans for children announced by some of the Presidencial consultation committees recently. For our future, We have to make efforts such as increasing concern, larger investment, establishing complex plans of social care for school aged children, community networking, coordinating in related ministries, working out measures for reducing economic burden of parents.