남북한 스포츠교류 체험의 현상학적 의미

박주한 서울여자대학교 인문과학연구소 1996 인문논총 Vol.3 No.-

한국의 프로스포츠 현황과 과제

박주한,추연숙 한국체육정책학회 2005 한국체육정책학회지 Vol.6 No.-

체육단체 조직구조의 변천과정과 통합방안

박주한 한국체육정책학회 2015 한국체육정책학회지 Vol.13 No.1

The past effort for the consolidation of sports groups had been initiated in reflection of governmental policies at the early stages of each governmental administration. However, such effort has resulted in its original point without resulting in a lead. Since 2003, the Korean Olympic Committee has resolved to the unification with KOC and changed the name to its English form of the Korean Olympic Committee (“KOC”), in order to emphasize that the organized group is not a consolidation of the Korean Olympic Committee and KOC, but a new establishment of KOC. The Korean Olympic Committee is opposing the bifurcation of the legal corporatization of the National Council of Sport for All, but is adhering to the official position of opposing permanent corporatization, while embracing the condition for a grand consolidation. On the contrary, the National Council of Sport for All has demanded the consolidation of an equal relationship, after establishing a legal corporation by revising the National Sports Promotion Act (enacted as the Sport for All Promotion Act) and the separated independence of KOC. Accordingly, both groups empathize with the need for consolidation, but are insisting on a method of consolidation that benefits their own organization. An initiation plan that is most suitable for the consolidation of organizations is to establish a social negotiation organization wherein the consolidation can be discussed, and to initiate promotion and relegation by implementing the consolidated athlete registration system by strengthening the installation of a one-category one-association system. Further, in order to successfully realize this plan, the strong will and administrative/financial support of the government and the national assembly toward the consolidation of organizations must follow.

체육의 정책윤리에 관한 연구

박주한 한국체육철학회 2009 움직임의철학 : 한국체육철학회지 Vol.17 No.4

This paper studied the relevance of sport policy and ethics, the theoretical grounds of sport policy ethics and the measure to secure ethics in sport policy based on related literature. 1) The ethical problem is caused by the fact that the work subject is a certain individual or a group. Thus, the ethical standard and normative selection cannot be avoided in the process of policy making. The policy decision itself is the product of values and ethical judgment of the people who participate in the policy making process. Therefore, the relationship between sport policy and ethics becomes a very important factor in the development of sport. 2) Policy ethics is deeply related to utilitarianism (criticism based on the result) and the deontology (criticism based on the right or rule); ethical standard can be classified into individualism (microscopic view) and groupism (macroscopic view); and communication. Considering everybody, an integrated ethics should be searched. 3) The most important policy analyst in the policy making process can be categorized in to three types. These are the objective technician tape, client’s advocate tape and issue advocate tape. Those three tapes are applied and connected under the circumstances of sport policy making process in order to secure ethics in the process and the result, as well as minimize conflict. Furthermore, as a measure to secure sport policy ethics, this study proposes specialization and a sense of view of the policy-making of scholars and public officials; society that respects fairness and justice; PR or policies and administration; expansion of public opening and real-name system; enhancement of information exchanges, and cooperation among relevant departments (the establishment of 'National Physical Fitness and Sports Committee' under direct of the president); the introduction of a manual system and simplification of the process, and reinforcement of the representativeness of sport groups, etc. 이 연구의 목적은 체육정책과 윤리의 결부, 체육정책윤리의 이론적 근거와 윤리 확보방안 제시를 목적으로 하고 있다. 오늘날 체육정책의 분석과 결정, 그리고 집행과 평가과정에 대한 불신현상은 종종 나타난다. 이러한 문제를 최소화하기 위하여 관련문헌 중심으로 고찰하였다. 1) 작업의 주체가 특정 개인 또는 집단이라는 것에서 윤리적 문제가 발생하며, 정책과정에서 가치판단의 윤리적 기준과 규범적 선택을 회피할 수 없다. 정책결정 그 자체가 정책결정과정에 참여하는 사람들의 가치관과 윤리적 판단의 산물이기 때문이다. 그러므로 체육정책과 윤리성의 관계는 체육발전을 위하여 매우 중요한 요소가 된다. 2) 체육정책윤리는 공리주의(결과론)와 의무론(또는 권리론, 규칙론)과 깊은 관련이 있고, 윤리수준은 개인론(미시론)과 집단론(거시론)으로 구분될 수 있으며, 이들 이론은 장점을 살리고 약점을 보완할 수 있는 방법으로 양쪽 모두를 중시하는 소통과 통합적 윤리가 모색되는 것이 바람직하다. 3) 체육정책 역할윤리와 관련하여 정책과정에서 가장 중요한 정책분석가는 일반적으로 객관적 기술자 모형, 고객옹호자 모형, 쟁점 옹호자 모형의 세 가지로 유형화할 수 있으며, 체육정책분석가의 역할 윤리는 상황에 따라 선택적 입장을 취하면서도 중복적, 연계적 관계 속에서 상호 간의 소통을 통한 정책과정과 결과의 윤리를 확보하면서 갈등을 최소화하는 노력이 요구된다. 그리고 체육정책 윤리의 확보방안으로 정책학자 및 공직자의 전문성과 가치관, 공평성·정당성 존중의 사회, 정책 의 홍보와 공개 및 실명제 확대, 부처 간의 정보교류 및 협력 강화(대통령 직속 국민체력스포츠위원회 설치), 매뉴얼 시스템 확대와 정책제안 활성화, 체육단체의 대표성과 역량강화 등을 제시하고 있다.

스포츠강사제도의 정책윤리적 의미

박주한 한국체육철학회 2012 움직임의철학 : 한국체육철학회지 Vol.20 No.1

The purpose of this study is to develop the sports instructor business. This study points out problems that need to be done for the process of promoting the sports instructor business in elementary school and future tasks. From a utilitarian viewpoint, it explains the moral value of good will, which divides into positive and negative aspects. The problems of sports instructor business and future tasks are as follows: First more sports instructors must be deployed for work and excellent resources must be procured to them and their students. Second, sports instructors should be given better treatment and a more stable social status. Third, the role of sports instructors must be established in the educational system. fourth, there should be a secured legal basis. and fifth, there should be stabilized financial affairs for supporting sports instructors. There are implications from the policy-ethics of sports instructor business, and positive values of the system deduced from the utilitarian point of view as follows: ① Making the operation of physical education classes substantial through the security of having expert instructors, ② Enhancing the satisfaction level of physical education class participants, ③ Reducing the burden of elementary school teachers in doing their work, ④ Activation of after-school sports activities, ⑤ Contributing to the construction of a system for cooperation between the government departments in charge. On the other hand, the negative values of the sports education as seen from a utilitarian viewpoint are as follows: ① It becomes a means of concealing unemployment through incomplete employment, ② Extravagant use of professionals and increase in low-income workers, ③ Structural problems of social exclusion in terms of individuals (sports instructors) and groups, ④Degradation of self-esteem among sports instructors due to confusion in role and unstable social status. 이 연구는 스포츠강사사업의 발전을 목적으로 초등학교 스포츠강사사업의 현황분석을 통하여 추진과정에서의 문제점 및 추진과제를 제시한 후 공리주의적 관점에서 선의지의 도덕적 가치를 긍정적 측면과 부정적 측면으로 구분하여 설명한다. 스포츠강사사업의 문제점 및 추진과제로는 첫째, 스포츠강사 확대 배치와 우수자원 확보, 둘째, 스포츠강사의 신분안정 및 처우개선, 셋째, 스포츠강사의 역할정립, 넷째, 스포츠강사의 법적 지원근거 확보, 다섯째, 재정의 안정적 확보가 요구된다. 스포츠강사제도의 정책윤리적 의미로는 첫째, 스포츠강사사업을 공리주의적 관점에서 긍정적 가치는 ①체육수업운영의 전문성 확보를 통한 내실화, ②체육수업 참가자의 만족도 증진, ③초등교사의 수업부담 감소, ④방과 후 체육활동의 활성화, ⑤정부 주관 부처 간 협력체제 구축의 결과를 가져왔다. 둘째, 스포츠강사사업을 공리주의적 관점에서 부정적 가치는 ①불완전한 고용을 통한 실업률 은폐의 수단, ②전문 인력 남용과 동시에 저소득층 양산, ③스포츠강사 개인과 집단 차원에서 사회적 소외의 구조적 문제 야기, ⑥사회적 신분의 불안정과 정체성(역할)의 혼란으로 자존감을 상실하게 만드는 결과를 가져왔다.

국가 체육지도자 자격제도의 개선 방안

박주한 한국체육정책학회 2008 한국체육정책학회지 Vol.11 No.-

존 롤스(J. Rawls)의 정의론과 체육정책의 방향

박주한 한국체육정책학회 2018 한국체육정책학회지 Vol.16 No.1

Today, a theory of justice by John Rawls has emerged because utilitarians paid no attention to the distribution method considering the socially disadvantaged since they were most interested in finding the point where social benefits would be maximized, and therefore institutional mechanisms were needed to resolve inequality and give consideration to underprivileged groups. In a five-year plan for the state management released by Moon Jae-in government, terms such as justice, fairness, equality, public welfare, balanced development and state responsibility(responsible state) were mostly used, and a blind recruitment system was adopted in the hiring process to realize these values. Since this system is a kind of Rawls’ approach that makes an attempt at the original position considering the veil of ignorance that removes all academic details including schools, credits and specs, it can be safely said that the philosophy of John Rawls is directly or indirectly reflected in the state management of Moon Jae-in government. John Rawls presented the principles of justice in the order of the first principle of equal liberty and the second principle of limitations to equality (fair equality of opportunity, difference principle) according to the degree of importance based on the basic premises of social contract, original position and veil of ignorance. In this regard, the main directions of sport policy to be emphasized by Moon Jae-in government in accordance with Rawls’s theory of justice are as follows. First, the government should nurture athletes with a guarantee of basic liberty and construct a career support system. Second, it should establish a fair personnel management system by procedural justice. Third, it should ensure the balanced installation and operation of community sports facilities per unit population. Fourth, it should strengthen support systems to encourage low-income and disadvantaged groups to participate in sport.

‘스포츠지도사’ 자격제도 개선의 과제

박주한,박성준 한국체육정책학회 2014 한국체육정책학회지 Vol.12 No.1

This study seeks to supplement the revised qualification policy for sports instructors. This study also intends to consider the ‘Sports Instructor’ policy through a critical approach in reference to related literature. The use of the title sports instructor is appropriate in terms of literary properties. However, it is in appropriate to categorize sports instructors into elite sports and sports for all, and using the term ‘sports’ in the titles youth sports instructor and elderly sports instructor. Partial abolition of the exemption based on academic background and grades poses the risk of not acknowledging the professionalism of university education, since only teaching and coaching experiences are recognized. The new policy has reinforced site adaptation skills by adding practical training to those with approved practical skills. The exemption from written examinations for school physical education teachers can be understood. However, it is unreasonable to exempt national athletes and professional sports athletes from the written tests. A practical category must be additionally appointed as used in elite sports and sports for all. Minimizing written examination subjects may simplify the administrative process, but subjects must be expanded to include essential and selective subjects, as there are problems with the combined theoretical examination. The qualification conditions set by the examiner are judged as appropriate. However, the plan to secure fairness is insufficient. A practical training course comprising theoretical education rather than on-site practical training alone, and the distribution of national certificates have not been reinforced.

학생체력 증진을 위한 교육ㆍ사회적 기반 조성 방안

박주한,김현석 한국체육정책학회 2007 한국체육정책학회지 Vol.9 No.-

학술연구논문 포스터발표 : 1분과: 산림환경, 산림생태, 수목학, 분류, 조림 ; 2004년 이후 지리산, 백운산 지역의 수종 구성 변화

박주한,이우신,박종영,김현석 한국임학회 2013 한국임학회 학술발표논문집 Vol.2013 No.-