http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 박용이 (검색결과 6,416 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
박용구(Park Yong Koo, 朴容九),김미정(Kim Mi Jung, 金美廷) 한국외국어대학교 일본연구소 2015 日本硏究 Vol.0 No.66
This study researched ① How do Korea and Japan evaluate the other's soft power resources respectively? ② Among them, which ones are pros and cons toward the relationship between Korea and Japan? ③ How can we examine the present and future of the relationship between Korea and Japan with the evaluation of soft power resources? Joseph Samuel Nye categorized soft power resources into political value, culture and foreign policy. In the political value, Korea perceived Japan to be militarism or nationalism and Japan also perceived Korea to be nationalism or statism. In cultural aspect, Japan showed interest in tourist spot, cuisine, history of Korea and Korea showed interest in tourist spot, manufactured goods, animation and Manga, history of Japan. Generally, Japan presented more interest than Korea in cultural aspect. In foreign policy, Korea has taken much firmer stance toward clearing the past affairs, apology, compensation and recompence consistently. Japan also has held stronger stance since 2013 although it is difficult to assert because of the absence of material. Japanese answer of "going well in the relationship between both Countries" decreased from average 40% to 7% betwenn 1980's and 2000's. Korean answer of "going bad in the relationship between both Countries" was average 69% during same period, but it increased up to 90% in 2015. It is considered that the relationship of two countries has a rough time for a while because of negative forecast about the future of the two countries. This negative forecast has begun with minus evaluation of political value and foreign policy. Nevertheless, the evaluation of mutual culture is optimistic and both nations desire cultural exchange and resolution in relationship strongly. Namely, the future of the relationship between Korea and Japan is not dark.
-
-
-
-
朴用吉(박용길) 충남대학교 법학연구소 2003 法學硏究 Vol.14 No.1
우리나라 商法은 1999년 改正시에 株式會社는 定款이 정한 바에 따라 監事에 갈음하여 理事會 내 委員會로서 監査委員會를 설치할 수 있다고 하여 監査委員會制度를 채택(新設)하였다. 監査委員會를 설치한 경우에는 監事를 둘 수 없다. 따라서 본고에서는 株式會社의 監査委員會에 관한 硏究로서 序論에서는 株式會社에 있어서의 監査制度의 必要性에 대하여 알아보고 그 다음으로 監査委員會의 意義와 導入背景을 살펴보고 監査委員會는 어떻게 組織되고 運營되는 가 부분에서는 監査委員會의 設置의 根據, 監査委員會 委員의 資格, 委員의 選任, 解任, 任期, 監査委員會의 橫成을 살펴보았고 監査委員會의 運營의 장에서는 監査委員會의 代表, 監査委員會의 召集과 決議를 살펴보았고 그 다음으로 監査委員會의 職務權限과 義務의 장에서는 監査委員會의 職務執行의 監査 즉 業務 및 會計監査權, 그 밖의 監査委員會의 權限, 즉 子會社 調査權, 理事의 報告受領權, 臨時總會召集請求權, 각종 訴의 代表權, 違法行爲留止請求權, 淸算人으로부터의 각종 書類受領權을 살펴보았고, 監査委員會의 義務에서는 善良한 管理者의注意義務, 理事會에 대한 報告義務, 株主總會에서의 意見陳述義務, 監査報書를 作成義務 등을 살펴보았고, 그리고 監査委員會 委員의 責任을 살펴보았으며, 그 다음의 監査委員會制度의 問題點의 장에서는 監査委員會의 業務監査權에 관한 問題, 監査委員會委員 選任의 問題, 監査委員會의 機能上의 問題, 監査委員會의 獨立性 文題를 살펴보았고, 마지막으로 結論부분에서는 監査委員會制度의 改善方案을 提示해보았습니다. In Korea, the "audit committee system" was introduced in accordance with the revision of the commercial law in 1999. According to the articles of association, a corporation is able to adopt the audit committee system as an internal committee of the board of directors. If a corporation introduces an audit committee, the corporation cannot belong to an external accounting auditor. In the introduction of this study, we examine the need of the audit system for corporations and look into the significance of a audit committee and backgrounds for introducing a committee. Taking up the main subject, in the part for understanding organization and management of the audit committee system, we identify reasons for establishing the audit committee and know qualification, assignment, dismissal and term of office of a committeeman, and organization of the committee. Furthermore, we seek to know the representative, the convocation and the resolution of the committee. In the section on rights and duties of the audit committee, we go into enforcement by the committee, businesses, the right for accounting and other rights; the right to investigate affiliated companies, the right to collect results by directors, the right to represent subcommittees, the right to request to stop illegal acts, the right to receive any document from liquidators. And then, we go into duties of the committee such as the duty to take a notice to respondents as by a generous manager, the duty to report to the board of directors, the duty to present opinions at a general meeting of stockholders, the duty to make reports of auditing results and responsibilities of the committee. To solve problems of the committee, in the next part, we consider the matter on auditing businesses, the matter of assigning a committeeman, the function of the committee and the independence of the audit committee. In conclusion, I present what will be necessary in the future for enhancing the functions of the audit committee system.
-
박용일(朴墉一)(Park, Yong-Il) 일본어문학회 2012 일본어문학 Vol.57 No.-
本論文は、日本語の補助動詞構文のうち｢テ｣形補助動詞として呼ばれている補助動詞構文の表層構造(surface-structure)を明示し、個々の｢テ｣形補助動詞構文を総合的にまとめたものである。本論文の考察結果は以下のようにまとめることができる。 Ⅰ. ｢おく｣、｢みる｣、｢みせる｣、｢いる｣、｢いく｣を補助動詞とする｢テ｣形補助動詞構文はそれらの表層構造において単文構造と複文構造の2通りの統語構造を持っている。 Ⅱ. ｢やる｣、｢もらう｣、｢くれる｣、｢しまう｣、｢くる｣を補助動詞とする｢テ｣形補助動詞構文はそれらの表層構造において単文構造だけを持つ。 以上のような本論文の考察結果は、｢しか｣と否定詞｢ない｣の間に存在する同節制約と、｢だけ｣と｢ない｣の相対的なスコープ関係をもって導いたものである。 また、このような考察結果から得られる大事な事実は、個々の｢テ｣形補助動詞構文の表層構造において、元々複文構造であるとされる統語構造を維持している｢テ｣形補助動詞構文は存在しないという点である。
-
박용일(朴墉一)(Park, Yong-Il) 일본어문학회 2012 일본어문학 Vol.59 No.-
本論文は、日本語のイ形補助動詞のうち、特に｢はじめる｣、｢かける｣、｢きる｣、｢だす｣を補助動詞とする構文を中心にイ形補助動詞構文の統語構造を考察した。考察の際用いた文法現象は、尊敬語現象と、｢だけ｣と｢ない｣のスコープ現象である。 本稿の考察結果をまとめると次のようになる。 Ⅰ. ｢はじめる｣と｢きる｣を補助動詞とするイ形補助動詞構文は、元々生成される時の複文構造と、一定の派生過程を経て現れる単文構造を両方持っている。 Ⅱ. ｢かける｣と｢だす｣を補助動詞とするイ形補助動詞構文は、単文構造のみの機能をみせる。 本研究において特に注目すべき点は、日本語のイ形補助動詞構文には複文構造だけをみせるものはないということである。このような事実は、元々複文構造であったイ形補助動詞構文が派生過程を経る中で、複文構造をそのまま維持しているものはないということを意味する。 本稿では｢はじめる｣、｢かける｣、｢きる｣、｢だす｣以外のイ形補助動詞構文についての個別的な考察は行われていない。これらのイ形補助動詞構文についての個別的な考察は今後の課題として残す。
-
-
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
