http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
박상도 언어과학회 2022 언어과학연구 Vol.- No.101
The system of feature inheritance from C to T entails the syntactic presence of C in any tensed clause where Agree and Case assignment take place. However, the complementizer that, which is conventionally assumed to head a tensed clause, never appears in a main clause in English, and this empirical fact implies that the complementizer occupies a higher syntactic position than C. Here emerges the necessity to postulate a CP shell above CP. The author suggests labeling this shell as cP, headed by the complementizer that. The specifier of little c is the target of wh-movement in embedded clauses whereas the null head C contains various features associated with such syntactic operations as feature inheritance, negative inversion, and wh-movement in main clauses. .
内村鑑三의 再臨思想批評 - 海老名弾正와 富永徳麿를 중심으로 -
박상도 일본어문학회 2011 일본어문학 Vol.52 No.-
本稿では、内村鑑三の再臨思想をめぐって、海老名弾正と富永徳麿によって行われた再臨批判の言説を考察し、また内村鑑三の再臨思想の内容についても具体的に考察してみた。まず、海老名と富永の批判の核心にあたる内容を整理してみると、キリストの有形的復活、有形的再臨は受け入れがたいというのがその中心にある。キリストの復活と再臨は、霊的なものであり、精神的なものとして解釈しないといけないと、彼等は主張する。そして、聖書の解釈も文字の一つ一つに拘らず、全体の精神を捉えるべきであると彼等は再臨思想を批判する。海老名と富永の再臨批判は復活、神の国、歴史観、聖書解釈などにおいて、内村と克明に対照をなす。内村の再臨思想はイエスキリストの有形的な肉体の復活、可視的再臨を受け入れている。そして聖書解釈においても文字的な解釈と聖書無謬説を支持している。内村は聖書に書かれているとおり、キリストの復活、再臨を確信していたし、目に見える形でイエスキリストがこの世に再臨するとき、人類の歴史が完成するという思想を持っていた。しかし、このような思想は当時としては、あまりにも破格的なもので、一般のキリスト教界では、反発か大きかったし、内村は段々孤立していくしかなかった。
Splitting Semantic Features for the External Argument
박상도 한국외국어대학교 언어연구소 2013 언어와 언어학 Vol.0 No.61
The subject-object asymmetries observed in theta-role assignment have motivated some researchers to analyze the external argument as being severed from VP. The analyses along these lines inevitably lead us to conclude that unaccusative verbs and transitive verbs have the identical argument structure. This paper discusses why this is an erroneous conclusion and argues for the necessity to split semantic features for theta-marking the external argument. This proposed mechanism can provide an explanatory account of why only some verbs allow inchoative-transitive alternations and how a verb can affect the selection of an external argument without violating the locality condition.
Case Assignment in There-Constructions
박상도 언어과학회 2013 언어과학연구 Vol.0 No.65
Despite its conceptual elegance, the probe-goal theory established in the current version of the Minimalist Program faces some problems in analyzing there- constructions where the clause is headed by defective T. An analysis of treating the postcopular nominal as a kind of predicate can solve these problems, but it also falls short of explanatory adequacy in dealing with some other aspects in there-constructions where an unaccusative verb is selected. This paper identifies two different types of there- constructions, arguing that only one of them involves a multiple Agree relation. While discussing what it takes to operate an effective Case- assigning mechanism, the paper introduces the Revised Maximization Principle and the Feature-Based Relativized Minimal Link Condition.
Another Unified Approach to Japanese Passives
박상도 언어과학회 2016 언어과학연구 Vol.0 No.77
The traditional analyses of Japanese passive constructions in the framework of generative grammar have been divided largely between the Uniform Hypothesis and the Nonuniform Hypothesis. Despite what its name suggests, the Uniform Hypothesis does not prove to be sufficiently “uniform” when a wider range of data is considered, and therefore it is not conceptually more elegant than the Nonuniform Hypothesis. In addition, some empirical problems still remain unsolved in these classic analyses although subsequent research has been continued to produce a more general theory for reconciling them. Hence, this paper proposes a new analysis that deserves to be called a “unified” approach to Japanese passives in such a way that only one kind of passive morpheme is needed to account for all the relevant passive constructions. In an attempt to achieve theoretical simplicity, it will also suggest a device for adding an extra argument in a monoclausal sentence.