http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
All Good Things Did Not Go Together: Nepal’s Democratization since the Collapse of the Monarchy
조엘 R. 캠벌,금희연,강가 바하두르 타파 21세기정치학회 2013 21세기 정치학회보 Vol.23 No.2
This paper critically reviews the challenges Nepal is facing as it struggles to transform from insurgency to a peaceful and stable democratic society. Examining Nepal’s political constellation, the course toward structural change becomes evident, especially efforts to solve the country’s fundamental problems. There is a promising window of opportunity to institutionalize constitutional reforms, create new state institutions, and establish the rule of law and democratic pluralism. The Constituent Assembly (CA) should employ a bottom-up model of engaging citizens in the practice of democracy, but it is not certain whether the new constitution will change Nepali power dynamics or facilitate a democratic constitutionalism and consensual model of democracy that can end instability and violence. The victory of liberal democracy appears far more fragile and incomplete than many had initially expected. This is precisely what the first CA, elected in 2008 for a two year term, failed to accomplish in the repeatedly extended tenure of a total of four years. The monarchy proved ineffective, as it was an outdated feudal institution that utilized divide-and-conquer politics to keep itself in power while the state crumbled around it. Unfortunately, it was replaced by a system based on corruption and cronyism.
All Good Things Did Not Go Together
Joel R. Campbell(조엘 R 캠벌),Ganga Bahadur Thapa(강가 바하두르 타파),Hieyeon Keum(금희연) 21세기정치학회 2013 21세기 정치학회보 Vol.23 No.2
This paper critically reviews the challenges Nepal is facing as it struggles to transform from insurgency to a peaceful and stable democratic society. Examining Nepal’s political constellation, the course toward structural change becomes evident, especially efforts to solve the country’s fundamental problems. There is a promising window of opportunity to institutionalize constitutional reforms, create new state institutions, and establish the rule of law and democratic pluralism. The Constituent Assembly (CA) should employ a bottom-up model of engaging citizens in the practice of democracy, but it is not certain whether the new constitution will change Nepali power dynamics or facilitate a democratic constitutionalism and consensual model of democracy that can end instability and violence. The victory of liberal democracy appears far more fragile and incomplete than many had initially expected. This is precisely what the first CA, elected in 2008 for a two year term, failed to accomplish in the repeatedly extended tenure of a total of four years. The monarchy proved ineffective, as it was an outdated feudal institution that utilized divide-and-conquer politics to keep itself in power while the state crumbled around it. Unfortunately, it was replaced by a system based on corruption and cronyism.