Analytical and empirical studies on the characteristic resistances of no-insulation GdBCO racetrack pancake coil under various operating currents

김광록,최윤혁,D.G. Yang,D.H. Kang,J.H. Kim,김호민,이해근 한국물리학회 2015 Current Applied Physics Vol.15 No.1

This paper presents the effects of the Lorentz force on the electrical behaviors of the no-insulation (NI) GdBCO racetrack pancake (RP) coil without turn-to-turn insulation by performing charging/discharging and sudden-discharging tests. The simulation results of the 2-dimensional finite element method showed that the Lorentz forces were generated towards the center of the winding pack consisting of 60- turn GdBCO CCs, which could enhanced the turn-to-turn contact within the RP coil. The charging/discharging test results indicated that the characteristic resistance (Rc) of the NI RP coil decreased with increasing operating current, which was caused by an increase of the Lorentz force. Further, the results of the sudden-discharging tests exhibited that the Lorentz force was dissipated instantly during the sudden-discharge of the coil, since the operating current immediately decreased to zero. Overall, this study clearly demonstrated that the Lorentz force induced by the operating current exerts the electrical behaviors of an NI RP coil.

기업지배구조 개선을 위한 최근의 상법상 변화

김광록,Kwang Rok Kim 한국비교사법학회 2014 비교사법 Vol.21 No.4

우리나라는 지난 1997년 소위 IMF 경제위기 이후 기업의 지배구조 개선을 위한 노력을 지속적으로 해 왔다. 이는 우리나라의 경제위기가 그간 우리나라 기업의 대표적 특성인 “재벌”들의 기업경영이 매우 불투명하게 이루어 져 온 것이 그 원인이라는 데에 큰 이견이 없었기 때문이다. 따라서 기업경영의 투명성과 소수주주의 권리 보호 등을 강화하는 것을 중심으로 하는 기업지배구조 개선의 노력은 지속되었고, 이러한 노력은 어느 정도 성공적인 결과를 나타내기도 하였다. 그러나 2008년 미국 발 세계경제 위기는 우리나라 기업환경의 변화를 더욱 강하게 요구하였으며, 우리나라는 기업지배구조의 국제적 정합성과 세계적 경향을 따르는 것은 물론 국내 경제 활성화를 위하여 지속적인 지배구조개선의 노력을 유지하여 왔다. 이러한 노력은 지난 2011년 대대적인 상법 개정을 통하여 그 성과를 나타낸 바 있으며, 가장 최근인 지난 2013년 7월 새로운 개정안을 제시하기도 하였다. 이렇듯 우리나라는 지난 1997년 말부터 지금까지 상법상 기업의 지배구조에 관한 변화를 요구하였고, 상법은 이 요구를 어느 정도 수용하면서 변화를 거듭하여 왔다. 따라서 이 논문은 기업의 지배구조의 전체적인 변화를 살펴보고 그 흐름에 따른 향후 개선 방안에 대하여 살펴보고자 한다. Recently endeavors for improving the corporate governance system has been continued all over the world. As for Korea, the economic crisis of the late 1997 was the turning point to the new era for improving Korean corporate governance. After the 1997 economic crisis, endeavors for betterment of Korean corporate governance, such as some new schemes for transparencies of corporate management and protective policies of minority shareholders, had been gradually increased, and these endeavors looked somewhat successful. However, the new world economic crisis in 2008 demanded Korean corporate circumstance new changes, the Korean government has continually tried to improve the corporate governance in order to catch up with the world’s consistency and international trend, and totally amended the Korean Commercial Code in 2011. Moreover, the Korean government, most recently, proposed to amend the Korean Commercial Code again in 2013 and this proposal included most controversial issues especially to Korean enterprises unlike some existed changes of Korean Commercial Code related to the Corporate governance in Korea by then. In the meanwhile, many studies and researches have focused on the detail subjects related to the Korean corporate governance whenever the Korean Commercial Code has been amended since the last economic crisis in 1997, but there are rare studies which screened the general amendments at large and examined the history of the changes of the corporate governance in Korea. Therefore, this article systematically examines the flow of changes for the betterment of Korean corporate governance since the economic crisis in 1997 and studies for the 2013 government’s proposals of amendment to the Korean Commercial Code. Through this article, the model of the corporate government standard to some other countries in the East Asia, especially to China could be established.

상장기업 정보공시제도의 비교법적 검토

김광록(Kim, Kwangrok) 한국비교사법학회 2021 비교사법 Vol.28 No.3

증권시장의 안정적 성장은 그 증권시장에 투자하는 투자자가 얼마만큼 그 시장을 신뢰할 수 있는가에 달렸다고 할 것이다. 따라서 투자자 자신이 투자하고자 하는 증권에 대하여 얼마나 투명하고 정확한 정보를 근거로 투자판단을 하느냐 하는 것이 증권시장에 대한 신뢰성을 확보하는 매우 중요한 요인이 되는 것이다. 바로 이러한 측면에서 기업정보의 올바른 공시는 증권시장이 효율적으로 운영 및 유지되도록 하는 것은 물론 증권시장에서 나타나는 사기행위를 방지하는 전통적인 방어수단이 되고 있다. 따라서 기업에 대하여 기업정보, 특히 기업이 발행하는 주식 등에 대한 정보를 포함하는 기업정보를 의무적으로 공시하도록 하는 것은 증권시장이 안정적으로 성장하는 기장 기본적인 요소이기도 하면서 그러한 증권시장에 투자하는 투자자를 보호하는 중요한 수단이 된다. 이러한 기업정보 공시제도와 관련하여 상법은 상업등기제도를 두고 있고 자본시장법은 소위 의무공시제도를 두고 있다. 이 중에서 자본시장법상 의무공시제도는 특히 상장기업에 대한 투자자의 투자판단에 중대한 영향을 미칠 수 있는 기업정보를 공시하도록 하여 투자자가 해당 기업의 정보를 바탕으로 정확한 투자 결정을 할 수 있게 해주는 제도이다. 이러한 의무공시제도는 불공정거래행위 등 증권시장에서의 사기행위를 규제하는 자본시장법의 또 다른 축으로서 매우 중요하다. 이 글에서는 자본시장법상 의무공시제도를 미국의 연방증권법상 의무공시제도와 비교함으로써 자본시장법상 의무공시제도의 발전 방안을 모색해 보고자 하였다. 특히 최근 미국이 예측정보의 공시에 대한 면책조항을 폐기하여 지난 2021년 2월 10일부터 그 면책조항의 효력이 없어진 것과 관련하여 우리나라 자본시장법도 새로운 방향을 모색해 보는 것이 중요하다. Steady growth of the market is depending on how much investor trusts the market and investor protections are very important. Namely, steady growth and investor protection depend on whether the price of stocks is fairly decided and whether investor’s decision to invest on those priced stocks is based on sufficient and fair information. Therefore, it is very important that the issuing companies disclose their accurate and sufficient information. When the companies disclose the right information, investors can make a successful decision to invest with a basis of this information. Under this circumstance, steady growth of the market can be guaranteed. With this point, this article basically introduces and analyzes the U.S. mandatory disclosure system under the U.S. Federal Securities Acts. After this work, the Article also introduces and analyzes the mandatory disclosure system under the Korean Capital Market Act in order to make suggestions for improving Korean mandatory disclosure system.

상법상 항공운송인의 물건운송에 대한 손해배상책임 규정 검토

金洸祿(Kwang-Rok Kim) 한국기업법학회 2011 企業法硏究 Vol.25 No.4

After The Korean government enacted the Part VI of Korean Commercial Code(herein after as “KCC”) as the Part of the “Carriage by Air” and the enactment of the Part VI is effective from November 24, 2011. Even though the Korean government ratified the Montreal Convention of 1999(Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, Signed at Montreal on 28 May 1999) on September 20, 2007 that became effective from December 29, 2007, there have not been any laws or regulations applying to the domestic air carriers for damages of goods which are caused by domestic air transportations. Moreover, the volume of air cargo transportation in Korea has increased in recent years nevertheless the KTX(Korean high-speed railroad) has been tremendously developed and expanded its routes all over the country. Therefore, the needs for some laws or regulations on the domestic air carriage including air carriers" liability for damages of goods has been increased as well in Korea. Under this circumstance, the Korean government has seriously deliberated on the subject of the needs and finally decided to enact the Part of the “Domestic Carriage by Air Act” in the KCC. This Article examines the newly enacted provisions of the KCC, focusing on the Air Carrier"s Liability for Damages of Goods which mainly reflected the Montreal Convention. Through the examinations, this Article tries to suggest some betterments of the enactment of KCC as well.

증권집단소송의 최근 동향으로 본 증권관련집단소송법의 발전적 개선을 위한 제언

김광록 ( Kwang Rok Kim ) 한국상사판례학회 2013 상사판례연구 Vol.26 No.3

The Korean government enacted the Securities related Class Actions Law in order to seek a relief for collective injuries of investors, caused in the course of unjust trading securities, and to enhance the operational transparency of companies in Korea. However, it is true that when the government first announced the enactment of the Securities Related Class Action Law, many experts worried recklessly extravagant uses of securities class actions. Despite of this worries the Securities Related Class Action Law took in effect in 2005. Historically said that securities class action system was made and developed under the American economic circumstance which is the representative model of the formal capitalism. So Korea is the unique country which introduced the securities class action system to its own financial market among the OECD member countries excluding the U.S. and Canada. In that the Korean government should be very serious and studied many aspects of securities class action in order to make the system of the securities class action just fit to the Korean financial market. However, the Securities Related Class Action Law in Korea is not very fit it-selt to the Korean financial market. Because there are only 5 securities related class actions that have been brought before the court since the enactment of the Securities Related Class Action Law, in spire of the experts worries that the Securities Related Class Action Law would cause recklessly extravagant uses of securities class actions. This Article is basically to examine the present conditions of securities class action in the Korean financial market as well as those in the U.S. financial market. And the Article also introduces the Federal Civil Procedure Rule, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act, Securities Litigation Uniform Standard Act, Sabanes-Oxley Act, and Class Action Fairness Act and studies the current trend of securities class action in the both countries in order to examines the reason why securities related class actions are not in use in Korean financial market. And the Article finally tries to make a proposition for the betterment of the Securities Related Class Action Law.

미국법상 내부자거래에 관한 규제 법리와 자본시장법

김광록 ( Kwang Rok Kim ) 한국상사판례학회 2009 상사판례연구 Vol.22 No.2

자동차손해배상보장법(自動車損害賠償保障法)상 법인(法人) 대표자(代表者)의 타인성(他人性)에 관한 판례연구 (대법원 2006.8.25선고 2006다3263판결)

김광록 ( Kwang Rok Kim ),조규성 ( Gyu Seong Cho ) 한국상사판례학회 2007 상사판례연구 Vol.20 No.3

적대적 M&A에 대한 방어수단으로서의 테뉴어 보팅(Tenure Voting)에 관한 미국판례 -대상판결: Williams v. Geier, 671 A. 2d 1368 (Del. 1996)-

김광록 ( Kwang Rok Kim ) 한국상사판례학회 2008 상사판례연구 Vol.21 No.2

자동차보험에서의 피보험자 개별적용 -보상실무상의 적용을 중심으로-

김광록 ( Kwang Rok Kim ),조규성 ( Gyu Seong Cho ) 한국상사판례학회 2008 상사판례연구 Vol.21 No.3

이동통신회사간의 번호이동성과 소비자보호 (330 F.3d 502; 2003 U.S. App.) (April 15, 2003, Argued, June 6, 2003, Decide)

김광록 ( Kim Gwang Log ) 한국상사판례학회 2003 상사판례연구 Vol.15 No.-

From the year of 2004, the number portability system is introduced and given effect to the Korean wireless telecommunications markets. For the enforcement of the number portability system, customers of the wireless telecommunications companies do not have to change their own wireless phone numbers even though they change the wireless carriers. As a result, the number portability system makes that each wireless carrier is trying to induce customers to let them keep or select its own services. Therefore, the competition between wireless carriers to hold customers is getting to keener. The actual purpose of the number portability system is to cause the fair competition between wireless carriers in order to give customers the best quality of the wireless telecommunications services. However, how could we handle the number portability system if the system obstructs the fair competitions between wireless carriers, and rather the system protects the existing big telecommunications companies and drives out new developing companies from the wireless telecommunications market. And for these reasons, if one wireless carrier claims to reserve the enforcement of the number portability system, what could we do for settling these problems. In order to find out the answers to these problems, it is worth examining the precedent related case in the United States. Therefore, this Review introduces the case of Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association and Cellco Partnership, D/B/A Verizon Wireless, Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Respondents Cingular Wireless LLC, et al., Interveners(330 F.3d 502; 2003 U.S. App.: April 15, 2003, Argued, June 6, 2003, Decide). In the United States, when a certain wireless carrier demands to reserve the number portability system and some conditions are met under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the enforcement of the system to the certain wireless carrier can be reserved. Namely, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 reads as follows: i.e (1) enforcement of such regulation or provision is not necessary to ensure that the charges, practices, classifications, or regulations by, for, or in connection with that telecommunications carrier or telecommunications service are just and reasonable and are not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory; (2) enforcement of such regulation or provision is not necessary for the protection of consumers; and (3)forbearance from applying such provision or regulation is consistent with the public interest. However, this Review also proposes to make a new scheme for the consumers protection under the number portability system when the portability circumstances are going to against the consumers protection and the public interests.