Novel influenza A (H1N1) 2009 infection in the pediatric patients with hematologic and oncologic diseases in the Yeungnam region

강석정,하정옥,이재민,심예지,이건수,신현정,김흥식,최은진,전소은,임영탁,박지경,박은실 대한소아청소년과학회 2011 Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics (CEP) Vol.54 No.3

Purpose: Natural history and consequences of the novel 2009influenza A H1N1 (2009 H1N1) infection in immunocompromised pediatric patients are not yet fully understood. In this study, we investigated the clinical features and outcomes of the 2009 H1N1infection in pediatric patients with hematological and oncological diseases. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 528patients who had hematological and oncological diseases and who were treated at 7 referral centers located in the Yeungnam region. Among the 528 patients, 27 with definite diagnosis of 2009 H1N1 infection were the subjects of this study. All patients were divided into the following 3 groups: patients who were receiving chemotherapy (group 1), patients who were immunosuppressed due to a nonmalignant hematological disease (group 2), and patients who were off chemotherapy and had undergone their last chemotherapy course within 2 years from the influenza A pandemic (group 3). Results: All 28 episodes of 2009 H1N1 infection were treated with the antiviral agent oseltamivir (Tamiflu^®), and 20 episodes were treated after hospitalization. Group 1 patients had higher frequencies of lower respiratory tract infection and longer durations of fever and hospitalization as compared to those in group 2. Ultimately, all episodes resolved completely with no complications. Conclusion: These results suggest that early antiviral therapy did not influence the morbidity or mortality of pediatric patients with hematological and oncological diseases in the Yeungnam region of Korea after the 2009 H1N1 infection. However, no definite conclusions can be drawn because of the small sample size.

미군정기 ‘서울시헌장’의 재발견 - ‘지방-국민국가-동아시아’의 구조와 긴장 -

강석정 한국법사학회 2018 法史學硏究 Vol.58 No.-

이 글은 미군정기 ‘서울시헌장’을 주로 다룬다. 서울시헌장을 기초로 서울은 대한민국에서 유일한 특별시가 되어 지금까지 이어지고 있다. 그런데 최근까지 서울시헌장의 영문본만발견되었을 뿐, 국문본은 발견되지 않았다. 종전에는 서울시헌장을 실패한 지방자치규범으로평가하고, 그 실패 원인을 좌우의 대립이라는 이데올로기적 요인으로 귀속시켜 왔다. 이 글은 서울시헌장 국문본의 존재를 확인하고, 이를 법적 관점에서 면밀히 분석하였다. 그리고서울시헌장이 이를 둘러싸고 있는 제반 국내․국제 환경과 어떻게 상호작용했는지, 그런 상호작용 속에서 서울시헌장이 어떻게 작동, 변질되었는지 등을 구조적․동태적 관점에서 분석함으로써 서울시헌장의 역사적 맥락이나 위상을 ‘지방-국민국가-동아시아’ 질서의 연계구조에서 재정립하고자 하였다. 한편 서울시헌장을 매개로 한 서울특별시 정책의 실패 원인을 국내 정치 투쟁이나 이데올로기적 요인이라는 단일하거나 결정적 인자로 귀속시키는 것이타당한지 여부도 비판적으로 재검토하였다. This paper reviews mainly ‘Charter of the City of Seoul’(hereafter Charter) during the American Military Occupation in Korea. With the Charter, Seoul became the only special and independent city in Korea and has came to this day. But until recently, only the english version of Charter was found and no korean version has been found. In the past, the Charter was regarded as a failure and the cause of failure was attributed to ideological factors such as strong conflict between the leftist and the rightist. This paper first identifies the existence of korean version of the Charter and analyzes it closely from legal point of view. And analyzes in a structural and dynamic perspective how the Charter interacts with the various domestic and international environments around it. Furthermore, aims to reestablish historical context and status of the Charter under the structure of ‘Local/Nation-State/East Asia’. On the other hand, this paper reviews critically whether it is appropriate to attribute the failure of special and independent Seoul plan through the Charter to a single factor, for example, political power struggle or ideology.

법관은 두 개의 양심을 가져야 하는가? - 헌법 제103조 법관의 ‘양심’에 관하여

강석정 사법발전재단 2017 사법 Vol.1 No.41

Article 103 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea provides, “Judges shall rule independently according to their conscience and in conformity with the Constitution and laws.” Traditionally, the mainstream position has been to interpret the “conscience” of a judge under Article 103 of the Korean Constitution as an “objective and professional” conscience, not a “subjective” conscience as a human being under Article 19 of the Constitution. According to this position, however, the judge turns out to be a curious being with both “subjective, non-judicial” conscience as a human being and “objective, judicial” conscience at the same time. As a result, it is not uncommon to hear from judges who confess that they experience conflict due to the clash between the subjective and objective consciences when presiding over trials. Against this backdrop, this article seeks to do the following: (a) review the developments surrounding the introduction of the concept of the judge’s “conscience” to the Constitution, as amended in 1962, the course of events leading up to the establishment of an interpretive theory in the constitutional scholarship ever since up to the present, and the latest, new perspectives on the judge’s “conscience”; and (b) compare conscience under Article 103 with that under Article 19 of the Constitution, and consider whether the intrinsic nature of conscience under Article 103 is objective, judicial, logical, neutral, and obligatory. Based on the above discourse, this article concludes as follows: (a) it is neither inherently appropriate, nor logical, nor practically useful to describe conscience as a concept comprising contrasting ideas by dichotomy between “objectivity versus subjectivity,” between “judicial versus non-judicial,” between “logic versus ethics,” and between “neutrality versus politics”; (b) in artificially attempting to structure the concept of judge’s conscience under Article 103 of the Constitution as an objective and neutral entity, the past mainstream position ended up giving a misleading impression as if judges have two inherently different, mutually clashing consciences; and (c) the cause for the situation can be found in linguistic system as well as the structure of ‘Western-Modern’ legal system. This is not to say that the judge’s conscience under Article 103 and that under Article 19 of the Constitution are identical even in terms of their constitutional function and status. From a fundamental, text and language point of view, Judge’s conscience under Article 103 features a strict restrictions under the Constitution and statutes, which is inevitably anticipated by the ‘Western-Modern’ legal system. The tension, friction, and conflict in the judge’s mind as manifested in the judge’s conscience under the restrictions of the Constitution and the laws(objective legal system) ought to be resolved, and can be resolved under certain conditions. Finally, based on the above analyses, this article seeks to address some of the practical legal issues, such as cases involving conscientious objection to military service and the issue of the jurors’ conscience under the Act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials. 대한민국 헌법 제103조는 “법관은 헌법과 법률에 의하여 그 양심에 따라 독립하여 심판한다.”라고 규정한다. 종전의 다수 입장은 헌법 제103조에서 말하는 ‘양심’은 헌법 제19조에서 말하는 인간으로서의 ‘주관적’ 양심이 아니라, 법조인으로서의 ‘객관적·직업적’ 양심이라는 것이고, 그렇다면 법관은 인간으로서 주관적·비법조적 양심을 가지면서 동시에 객관적·법조적 양심을 가진 기이한 존재가 된다. 그 결과 실제 재판에서 법관들은 주관적 양심과 객관적 양심이 충돌하고 이 때문에 갈등을 겪고 있다는 취지의 고민을 토로하고 있다. 본고에서는 우선, 1962년 헌법에 법관의 ‘양심’이 도입된 경위, 그 이후부터 현재까지 헌법학계의 해석론이 정립된 과정을 살펴보고, 최근에 새로운 시각에서 법관의 ‘양심’을 이해하는 입장들을 살펴보았다. 다음으로, 헌법 제103조의 양심을 제19조의 양심과 비교하면서 제103조의 양심이 본질적 속성에 있어서 객관적, 법조적, 논리적, 중립적, 의무적인 것인지 등을 검토하였다. 그 결과 양심이란 ‘객관 대 주관’, ‘법조 대 비법조’, ‘논리 대 윤리’, ‘중립성 대 정치성’ 등의 이분법적 도식으로 설명하기에 본질적으로 적절하지 않고, 이러한 도식적 접근은 논리적이지 않으며 실무상으로 유용하지 않다고 보았다. 종전의 다수 입장은 헌법 제103조 법관의 양심을 애써 객관적이고 중립적인 어떤 실체로 구성하려다 보니, 법관은 애초 본질이 다른 두 개의 양심을 가지고 있고, 두 개의 양심이 상호 충돌하는 것처럼 오해하게 만들었는데, 이런 사태의 원인은 서구 근대 법학 체계, 언어 사용 체계에서의 소위 ‘괄호 넣기’ 작업의 불가피성 때문이다. 하지만, 헌법 제103조 법관의 양심이 제19조 인간의 양심과 헌법상의 기능이나 위상까지 동일한 것은 아니다. 제103조 법관의 양심은 근원적·문언적으로 ‘헌법과 법률’에 의하여 강한 제약을 받는다는 점에 그 특징이 있고, 이는 서구 근대법 체계가 필연적으로 예정한 것이다. 그리고 헌법과 법률(객관적 법질서)의 제약하에 놓인 법관의 양심이라는, 다시 말해 ‘긴장’, ‘충돌’, ‘갈등’ 등으로 표현되는 상황은 해소되어야 하고, 일정 조건하에서 해소될 수 있다. 마지막으로 이상의 분석을 통하여, 법 실무에서 현재 첨예하고 문제 되는 소위 양심적 병역 거부 사건, 국민의 형사재판 참여에 관한 법률과 관련하여 향후 개정 과정에서 문제될 수 있는 배심원의 양심 문제도 해결해 보고자 하였다.

브랜드자산 강화요인의 영향성에 관한 연구

강석정 한국마케팅과학회 2000 마케팅과학연구 Vol.5 No.-

브랜드 자산가치의 형성에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구

강석정 한국마케팅과학회 2001 마케팅과학연구 Vol.8 No.-

충수염으로 속발된 요관폐색증 1례

강석정,성명순,최광해 영남대학교 의과대학 2009 Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine Vol.26 No.1

Appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdomen in pediatrics. Periappendiceal abscesses are frequently found in the pediatric population. Acute appendicitis in children can, at times, be a difficult clinical diagnosis because of its highly variable history? and physical manifestations and its unpredictable course. Despite the uncertainty of the diagnosis, appendicitis demands prompt treatment because of the risk of perforation, which occurs in approximately one third of cases. Urological manifestations of appendicitis and appendiceal abscess can vary. Acute appendicitis presenting with ureteral stenosis and hydronephrosis is very rare. Here, we report a case of acute appendicitis with perforation and left hydronephrosis in a 3-year-o1d female. This case presents a 3-year-old girl with dysuria having hydronephrosis that originated from a perforated appendix.

대한제국기 ‘분반(分半) 판결’에 관한 연구 -전통적 민사 재판에서 理는 무엇인가?-

강석정 한국법사학회 2017 法史學硏究 Vol.56 No.-

This paper reviews judgments of civil cases in the Hanseong․Hanseongbu court(lower court) and the Godeung․Pyeongliwon court(higher court) between April 1895 and July 1908 and primarily studies the ‘Bunban(分半)’ judgments of civil litigations in the ‘The Korean Empire(Daehanjeguk)’ period. Traditional civil trial and judgments have been called decisions by the ‘customary law and Li(理)’, ‘Qing․Li(情理)’ and ‘didactic conciliation’. But it has not been clarified exactly what is the substance or details of ‘Li’ and ‘Qing․Li’. Therefore this paper intended to reveal the substance and principles of ‘Li’ by examining ‘Bunban’ judgments. A Bunban judgment is a court decision which divides legal gain(benefit) or loss(damage) in half. Bunban judgments can be categorized into several types based on the grounds, motives of dividing in half. These are ⒜ the responsibility of both parties or neither type (i.e. ‘both parties are equally negligent’ or ‘neither is negligent’), ⒝ purchase in good faith type, ⒞ responsibility of third party type, ⒟ agreement type (i.e. ‘contract in half’ or ‘compromise or settlement in half in court’), ⒠ multiple debtors (decision based on custom and practice) type, and ⒡ difficulty in estimating the amount of damage or expense type. Once Bunban judgments are analyzed and categorized as above, several principles of ‘Li(理)’ can be found as mentioned below: “finding provider of cause in legal dispute”, “judgement of liability”, “stability of transactions”, “confirmation of facts through evidence”, “equal distribution of legal risk, etc. This conclusion leads us to the understanding of the substance of ‘Li’, legal reasoning and principles of law in traditional Civil trial and judgments. And ultimately we can access to clue of legal justice and equity in traditional society. 전통적인 민사 재판과 판결에 대하여 통상 ‘情理에 따른 재판’, ‘관습이나 理에 기초한재판’, ‘교유적 조정’ 등으로 칭해 왔다. 그러나 이때 말하는 ‘情理’ 또는 ‘理’의 구체적 내용, 이에 내재된 논리, 그 실체는 무엇인지, 과연 ‘교유적 조정’으로 단언할 수 있는지에 대하여는 다소 모호하게 이해되어 왔거나 명확히 해명되지는 못한 상태였다. 이 글은 법원도서관의 구한말 민사판결문 데이터베이스에 수록된 민사 판결문 중에서 이러한 의문을 풀기에적합한 대상으로 갑오개혁기․대한제국기(1895.4.~1908.7.)의 ‘분반 판결’을 선정하고 이를 분석하여 전통적 민사 재판과 판결의 논리, 원리, 실체 등에 접근해 보고자 하였다. 분반 판결은 판결요지에 ‘半’이라는 말이 포함되어 있고, 원․피고의 법률상 이해관계, 즉 법적 관점에서의 이익이나 손해를 반으로 나눈 판결을 의미하는데, 당사자 책임 판단형, 선의 매수형(형사법 적용형), 제3자 원인 제공형, 원․피고 합의형, 다수 채무자형(관례형), 입증 책임 반영형(액수 산정 곤란형) 등으로 유형화할 수 있다. 이렇게 분반 판결을 유형화하고 이를 분석하면, ‘분쟁의 원인 제공자 특정’, ‘책임성 판단’, ‘거래 안전 고려’, ‘증거를 통한 사실 관계 확정’, ‘합의나 관례의 존중’ 등의 원리를 확인할 수 있는데, 이를 理의 내용, 세부 원리, 실체로 이해해 볼 수 있다. 이로써 전통적 민사재판과 판결에서의 법적 논변, 사유 방식, 법 원리의 실체를 파악할 수 있고, 나아가 전통사회의 정의, 형평 관념의 단서에 접근해 볼 수 있다.

코로나19 시대에 원격교육을 경험한 간호대학생의 학습관련 자기주도성, 사회지능이 진로준비행동에 미치는 영향

강석정 학습자중심교과교육학회 2023 학습자중심교과교육연구 Vol.23 No.16

Objectives This study is to identify the degree of self-directed learning readiness, social intelligence, career preparation behavior and to confirm the effects of self-directed learning readiness, social intelligence on career preparation behavior of nursing students who experienced distance learning in COVID-19. Methods Data were collected from December 13 to December 23, 2022 using a structured questionnaire targeting 175 3rd and 4th grade nursing students in 3 regions where convenience samples were extracted. The collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficients and hierarchical regression analysis using the SPSS/WIN 27.0 statistical program. Results Self-directed learning readiness had a statistically significant positive correlation with social intelligence (r=.54, p<.001) and career preparation behavior (r=.52, p<.001). Social intelligence also had a statistically significant positive correlation with career preparation behavior (r=.41, p<.001). As a result of hierarchical regression analysis, the factors significantly affecting career preparation behavior were self-directed learning readiness (β= .37, p<.001), social intelligence (β=.19, p=.014). The overall explanatory power of these variables was 28.0%. Conclusions Development and application of various programs that can improve self-directed learning readiness and social intelligence of nursing students are necessary for career preparation behavior.

업무 프로세스 개선을 통한 암센터 주사실 방문 환자의 대기시간 감소활동

강석정 한국의료QA학회 2009 가을학술대회 Vol.2009 No.3

임상실습을 경험한 간호대학생의 공감피로, 공감만족, 영성과 삶의 질의 관계

강석정,이정림,Kang, Seok-Jung,Lee, Jung Lim 한국융합학회 2021 한국융합학회논문지 Vol.12 No.9

본 연구는 임상실습을 경험한 간호대학생의 공감피로, 공감만족, 영성과 삶의 질의 관계를 파악하기 위한 서술적 조사연구이다. 연구 대상은 C도에 소재한 3개 대학에서 임상실습을 수행한 4학년 간호대학생 172명이며, 자료는 2020년 11월 7일에서 12월 11일까지 구조화된 설문지를 이용하여 수집되었다. 연구결과, 공감피로의 하위요인 중 소진은 삶의 질과 유의한 부적 상관관계를, 공감만족은 삶의 질과 유의한 정적 상관관계를 나타내었다. 영성은 소진과는 부적 상관관계를, 공감만족과는 정적 상관관계를 나타내었다. 따라서 간호대학생의 공감피로와 공감만족을 조절하여 삶의 질을 향상시키기 위해 영성증진전략의 개발과 적용을 제언한다. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, spirituality and quality of life in nursing students with clinical practice. Participants were 172 fourth-year nursing students who were recruited from 3 universities. Data were collected using self-reported questionnaires from November 7 to December 11 in 2020. The results show that burnout was negatively correlated with quality of life and compassion satisfaction was positively correlated with quality of life. In addition, spirituality was negatively correlated with burnout and was positively correlated with compassion satisfaction. In order to improve the quality of life of nursing students, it is necessary to develop and apply a spirituality promotion strategy that can control compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction along with the enhancement of compassion competency in the undergraduate course