http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
金順吾,鄭美淳 동남보건대학 2001 論文集-東南保健大學 Vol.19 No.2
As the development of modern medical technology has been able to prolong patient's life span, concern about the meaning of life and the patient's quality of life, rather than the life span itself, has increased. Accordingly, the disease-oriented nursing in the past is required in to change into the human-oriented comprehensive nursing for the pursuit of patient's quality of life. This study is designed to provide the basic data of identifying nursing care plans based on comprehensive nursing by examining correlation between percie The instruments were tested for reliability. Data were colleved family support and the quality of life of chronic schizophrenic patients. The subjects of this study are 90 chronic schizophrenic patients currently admitted in one hospital, visiting outpatient department or three community mental health centers in Kyunggi province. The instruments used for this study were the family support scale made by Park(1985) and quality of life scale made by Noh(1988).cted from May 21 to June 7 2001 and analyzed by use of descriptive statistics. Pearson Correlation Coeffient, t-test, ANOYA and x²-test. The results of this study were as follows : 1.The mean score of the subjects' quality of life was 3.055±.472. 2.The mean score of the subjects' family support was 3.473±705. 3.There was significant difference in each case. 1) between subjects' qualify of life and economic status(F=3.127, p=.049). 2) between subjects' family support and type of medical security(F=4.728. p=.011), type of family(F= 374, p=.001).
김순오,강경아,이명숙 동남보건대학 2004 論文集-東南保健大學 Vol.22 No.1
The purpose of this study was to see teaching effectiveness in clinical education. The subject of this study were 234 D Health College nursing students in Suwon. This study was conducted during the period from May 27 to 31, 2004. The instruments used in this study was 1nstrument to Measure of Clinical Instructors by Reeve (l994). In order to measure general characteristics and teaching effectiveness, students were asked to submit self-report the papers which contain 66 questionnaires. The data were analyzed using SPSS PC+ program which included frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, ANOVA, t-test, and Pearson's correlation. The results of this study were as follows : 1) For the teaching effectiveness, the average marked 3.03 out of 5 and giving positive replies. and standard deviation was .48. 2) Available candidates for clinical instructors were put in order of the most preferable to the least preferable as follows instructors for a specific subject. a team of both nursing professors & head nurses. nursing professors. instructors from specific hospital, head nurses, which resulted in significant difference(F=2.86, p< .05). 3) Available teaching programs were put in order of the most preferable to the least preferable as follows : nursing skiJls, nursing process, a combination of nursing skills, orientation, conference etc.,orientation. inspection, conferences which resulted in significant difference(F=2.55, p< .05). 4) There was a significant difference between teaching effectiveness and role model(t=4.41, p< .001).
중년남성의 자기효능, 사회적지지, 건강증진생활방식에 관한 연구
金順吾 동남보건대학 2000 論文集-東南保健大學 Vol.18 No.2
The purpose of this descriptive study was to analyze the degree of self-efficacy. social support, health promoting lifestyle profile in middle aged men. The subjects of this study were 82 men in middle aged group. The degree of self-efficacy was measured used to self efficacy scale a four point likert scale consisting of 17 items. developed by Sherer(1982), social support was measured used to social scale a five point likert scale consisting of 18 items, developed by Cohen & Hoberman(1983). health promoting lifestyle profile was measured used to health promoring lifestyle profile scale a four point likert scale consisting of 47 items grouped into five subsections, developed by Walker(1982), and the demographic variables include 11 items. The period of data collection was from Mar. 2 to Apr. 15 .2000. The data were analyzed using the SAS program. The demographic variables were analyzed using frequency, percentage, degree of self efficacy, social support. health promoting lifestyle profile were analyzed using means and standard deviations, the relationship between the demographic variables and self efficacy, social support. health promoting lifestyle profile were analysing t-test and ANOVA. and correlation of self efficacy, social support, health promoting lifestyle were Pearson Coefficiant. The results of this study were as follows. 1. The means of total score showed that self-efficacy was 2.79±.36, social support was 2.65±.46, health promoting lifestyle profile was 2.42±.33. 2. A statistically significant difference were found in relationship of the following demographic variable to the degree of social support:age(F=-.363, P<.001)/health responsibility:monthly income(F=2.353 .P<.05)/personal relationship-occupation. (F=2.920, P<.05).present health problem(F=2.352, P<.05)/stress management:age (F=-.204, P<.05),monthly income(F=2.570. P<.05) 3. A statistically significant difference were found between the social support and self-efficacy(F=-.269,P<.01).health promoting lifestyle profile and social support (F=.502, P<.001).health promoting lifestyle profile and self efficacy (F=-.249, P<.001).
金順吾 동남보건대학 2001 論文集-東南保健大學 Vol.19 No.2
This study was conducted to investigate the physical health status and psychological health status of the aged. The subjects were 123 old people, men and women who were over 65, living in Suwon. The data for this study were collected using direct interviewing method from October 15 to November 15, 2001. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS program. The results of this study were as follows : 1. The average score of the subjects' physical health status was 2.562±.292. 2. Psychological health status was 2.494±.409. 3. The perceived health status of the aged was 3.081±.911. 4. Health status was significantly correlated with physical, psychological and perceived health status of the aged. 5. The physical and psychological health status showed the significant differences according to age, education, religion, marital status, spouser, occupation, economic status, family type, present health status, and Present illness.