http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
丁仲煥 東亞大學校 1966 東亞論叢 Vol.3 No.-
Every change of dynasty has a basis on the adequate reason and cause. Although the changing dynasty has, generally speaking, no epochmaking significance in the process of historical development, yet there are always some historically important factors in rising a new dynasty after the fall of a long lasted one in the history of a certain country. There are sufficient historical reasons in the changing process to the founding of the Korea dynasty from the fall of the Shilla dynasty. In this thesis the writer has first discussed the above historical reasons from the social state in the last period of the Shilla dynasty by (1) the rebellion and (2) the growth of powerful families, and secondly discussed the activities of Koongye and Kyunhwun from the separation of the Late Three Kingdoms which occured as a precondition to the establishment of the Korea dynasty by (1) the activity of Koongye and (2) the activity of Kyunhwun, and finally discussed the executive policy which Korea Taejo, the founder of the Korea dynasty, had exercised in the process of establishing a new dynasty by (1) the executive policy on the later Paikche, (2) the executive policy on Shilla and (3) the executive policy on the Northern Countries. 1. The rebellion of the late period of Shilla was confirmed being different in its quality between the one before Jin-Sung Queen, the 52nd throne, and the one after her. The rebellion before the Queen was conducted mainly for the purpose of contending for the throne among nobles, while the one after the Queen was mainly to deny the dynasty by powerful families. 2. The growth of powerful families was discussed by the growing process of district powerful families and by the social background. 3. The native social positions of powerful families and the purpose of their activities were clearly discussed. 4. The writer outlined Koongye's having rancor against Shilla and establishing Taebong Country as well as the activities until losing the country to Korea Taejo. 5. The writer outlined Kyunhwun's establishing the Later Paikche as a son of a farmer, and the activities he had until he lost the country to his son, Singum. 6. Korea Taejo's executive policy toward the Later Paikche was mainly by arms. 7. Toward Shilla, however, on the contrary, it was by protecting and soothing policy so that she finally volunteered to surrender. 8. Toward the Northern Countries, since the Korea dynasty succeeded Tae-bong Country, the doctrine of the new dynasty was to unify Three Hans(Mahan, Chinhan and Byunhan), to force nine East Races to surrender by a strong expanding-northward policy as to refund the old territory of Kokuryu, to win the people of Balhai and to eliminate the invasion of Kitan.
太祖御製御墨誥命書에 대하여 : 山淸郡丹城面南沙里 星州李氏 부조묘所藏
丁仲煥 東亞大學校 大學院 1977 大學院論文集 Vol.1 No.-
Komyungseo(誥命書), so called King Taejo's message, was fonferred on Yi Jae(李濟), Heongangun(興安君), in October 1392, the year TaeJo founded the Yi Dynasty. Laid in the shrine of Soungjoo clan of the Lees,(星州李氏), it was written sideways on silk cloth 96cm wide and 15cm long and arranged in 16 lines with 15 characters in each line. The roll reinforced with backing paper is 115cm wide and 36.5cm long; the left bar holding the roll still remains but the right one lost. Heongangun was born into a renowned lineage in the reign of King Gongmin of the Koryo Dynasty to lined under King Taejo. A man of literary and military achievements, he assisted Taejo in establishing the monarchy. In recognition of his meritorious service, he was designated a subject of the first class. This fact was referred to at a few places in the authentic history. The Koryo Sa(高麗史) says that Heongangun was born of a noble family and a man of extraordinary ability, holding in official post when yound and that as a son-in-law of King Taejo, he helped him lay the foundation of the dynasty. When Taejo was enthroned, Yi jae was designated Heongangun along with the title of mertiorious subject of the first class. He was, however, involved in the so-called revolt by royal princes and killed together with Cheong Do-jeon(鄭道傳), Mam Un(南誾) and Sim Hyo-Saeng(沈孝生). As a result, he was not allowed a place in the royal shrine. Later, in the reign of King Sejong he was restored to Heongangun, the title of meritorious retainer, and other related post and court rank, and was granted the privilege of being placed in the royal shrine. Meanwhile, Heongangun's shrine (dedicated to permanant rituals) located at Daeha-chon, Yonjin-gun, Kyunggi-do, later being moved to Do-chon, Kwangjoo when Maengsoon, the grandson of Heongangun, moved there to avoid the disaster in connection with six dead subjects(死六臣) of King Danjong. Since 1934 when his inherited grand son moved to Namsa-ri, Sanchoung-gun, Heongangun has been enshrined there. In short the origin and motivation of the King's message is obvious. This is also unique in that it is said it was composed and written by the king himself, and conferred on a meritorious subject of the first class. The author thinks that it deserves careful preservation by the government authorities.