http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김원곤 韓國外國語大學校 外國學綜合硏究센터 中國硏究所 2005 中國硏究 Vol.36 No.-
In this paper, I tried to explain the implications and the reflection of 'Taiwan Consciousness' in Taiwan society over the past five decades since the Februrary 28th Incident (generally referred to as '2.28') occurred in 1947. The Februrary 28th Incident of 1947 provides a dramatic demonstration of how such issues as national identity, cultural reconstruction, and the search for political autonomy have had significant impact on the development of 'Taiwan Consciousness'. The KMT's opposition, on the other hand, never forgot '2.28' and until the 1980s, used the incident as a powerful election platform and called on the government to narrow the gap between mainlanders and Taiwanese. In 1988, a native taiwanese Lee Teng-hui, ascended to the seat of power as president. The KMT mantle Lee inherited, however, made it imperative that he deflect the increasingly vocal and bitter charge that the president of the Republic of China is a Taiwan independence advocate. And so rather than insisting on a total rejection of China and treating it as a culturally and ethnically different alien other, as the radical wing of the independence movement does, Lee, more out of strategic considerations than sincere belief, does occasionally make public, lackluster acknowledgement of common cultural and ethnic roots with China. Lee's and, consequently, Chen Shui-bian's talk about Taiwanese national identity has infuriated communist leaders in Beijing. China has warned Taiwanese voters not to support independence leaders but has refused to acknowledge that their 'provocative talk' is backed by a real and growing sense of a new 'Taiwan consciousness'. This paper argues that the political change in Taiwan contains to major transitions, the political regime and national identity. These could be integrated into a framework composing two contrast references, i.e., 'modern democratic Taiwanese political nationalism' vis-a-vis 'traditional authoritative Chinese cultural nationalism'. The reason why the first repertoire is modern, it is because that fits into the modern world order, which is based on the territoriality. And since it fits into the world order, the Taiwanese consciousness would be politically self-generated in accordance with its territory. This nation/state-building is in accordance with the searching for Taiwan's subject. This paper also argues that Taiwan-centric consciousness is not tantamount to Taiwan independence, but instead gives priority to Taiwan's interests. The two sides of the Taiwan Strait will spend more time on crisis management rather than creating a sound framework for cross-strait interaction.
'하나의 중국'(一個中國)에 대한 中國과 台灣 · 美國의 기본 인식과 그 영향
金源坤 남서울대학교 2005 남서울대학교 논문집 Vol.11 No.1
過去國民黨和共産黨都主張「一個中國, 台灣是中國的一部分」, 但在九十年代以後, 由於台灣的民主化, 而有不同聲音, 國民黨的李登輝總統執政時期, 已開始出現「兩個中國」傾向, 民進黨公開主張「台灣獨立」. 2000年和2004年民進黨陳水扁總統當選後基本上排除國民黨的「一個中國」政策, 而走向以「台灣本土化」爲中心的台灣獨立路線. 陣政府所主張的以台灣獨立爲本質的「一邊一國」, 基本上是不可能爲中華人民共和國所接受. 而且美國對兩岸問題保持著二重的態度, 台灣內部社會對台灣獨立問題沒有達成公識等種種原因也是陳政府面臨的困難. 目前全球政治局勢的發展, 台灣獨立的主張似乎沒有發展的空間. 對台灣某些政治人物而言, 這類傾向台灣獨立的主張, 其實只是國內政治考量遠大於國際或兩岸政治的需要. 兩岸未來之關係有可能政治關係不確定的情況之下, 維持著經濟交流持續成長的局面.
초음파 모터의 위상차 조절과 위상차-주파수 다중 조절에 따른 속도 특성
김동옥,김원배,오금곤,최한수,김영동 조선대학교 에너지.자원신기술연구소 2003 에너지·자원신기술연구소 논문지 Vol.25 No.2
To control the position, velocity and torque of the ultrasonic motor, a great variety of method are proposed such as the amplitude, phase difference, frequency and so on. In the case of phase difference method, it has some advantages; it can control the direction and velocity of rotation only adjusting the phase difference and it has wide control-band. During the USM driving on adjusting phase difference, its characteristic was transformed by the change of resonance-frequency of stator, which means that the resonance frequency is different according to the phase difference. Consequently, we need to set up the most suitable driving frequency according to each phase difference.
김원곤 남서울대학교 1998 남서울대학교 논문집 Vol.4 No.-
This article purports; 1) to consider the theoretical aspects of 'One Country, Two Systems' ; 2) to analyze it ; and 3) to understand the unification policies currently performed by the Chinese government. The problems which are relative to the unification between China and Taiwan have enormous impacts upon the present status of affairs around the north-east Asia. Furthermore, this kind of consideration will afford a wide range of excellent lessons to the divided country of Korea. Since the 80s, when Deng Xiao Ping took power, the Chinese government has attempted assiduously to shift 'the armed unification policy' that Mao had carriedout before into 'the peaceful unification policy' and has laid out the general schema for unification of Taiwan. On the occasion of the retrocession of Hong Kong to China on the 1st of July in 1997, the Chinese government started to apply the schema virtually to its diplomatic strategy and is now ready to carry out the unification policies toward Taiwan. In this article, We will analyze the positions which China, Taiwan and United States might take in that the three countries mentioned hold the immediate key to the solutions of the unification problems. The efficiencies and problems predictable in the process of bringing 'One Country, Two Systems' to effect will be investigated.
「16차 당대회」를 통해서 본 중국 정치엘리트의 성격변화와 특징
김원곤 남서울대학교 2004 남서울대학교 논문집 Vol.10 No.3
中國共産黨每五年擧行一次的全國黨員代表大會, 是決定黨的理論、 方針、 路線和政策的一項重要會議。十六大的召開, 除了上述任務, 同時承擔世代交替、 權力傳承的重責大任。 本文乃透過中共甄拔政治精英的制度化與非制度化因素, 從權力領導核心之重組、 人事佈局原則分析、 人事變遷對未來之影響三部分, 針對十六大及十六屆一中全會的人事變動進一步硏究, 以做爲觀察中共未來走向依據之一。 本文最後指出, 中共十六大雖平穩地完成權力繼承, 不過其人事佈局, 基本上是由第三代領導所決定, 尤其是江澤民掌握了主導權, 其次是基於派系平衡考慮, 以致處處有妥協的痕跡。 在擴大各方利益, 讓各股勢力得以調和之下, 中國共産黨黨內民主機制是否向前推進, 値得觀察。
김원곤 한국중국문화학회 1999 中國學論叢 Vol.8 No.-
1949年10月, 中國政府成立後, 中國展開其所謂[社會主義新型外交], 以爲其政權存續與壯大的利益服務. 外交政策必然有具體設定的目標, 綜合觀察, 50年來中國政府始終不懈所追求的外交政策目標有三, 第一是安全的保障, 第二是대灣回歸祖國, 第三是對外影響力的展現, 包括國際地位的提昇在內. 目標持續不變, 但中國的外交政策動向각經歷多次變動. 1949年中國向蘇聯[一邊倒]到1960年代中蘇共分裂, 1972年後轉而同美國進行[低탕], 到1982年後, 開始展開獨立自主外交政策, 而1992年後, 隨著對內外環境的變化, 中國外交政策已經明顯呈現了全方位取向. 上述的對外變化過程乃爲本文的探討對象.
김원곤 남서울대학교 2010 남서울대학교 논문집 Vol.16 No.2
就在一九三五年, 日本帝國主義日益擴大對中國的侵略, 使中國民族危機空前嚴重起來. 日本在一九三一年侵佔東三省, 一九三三年侵佔熱河之後, 又於一九三五年五月製造華北事變, 提出對華北統治權的要求. 一九三七年七月七日日本發動盧溝橋事件, 中國與日本之間終於發生全面戰爭. 日本侵略中國之際, 蔣介石仍然採取‘先安內後攘外’策略, 後來因‘西安事件’與‘盧溝橋事件’的發生, 國民黨與共産黨達成第二次國共合作. 但統一戰線戰術的內容上, 國民黨與共産黨, 共産黨內毛澤東與王明之間存在著岐見. 國民黨主張片面抗日統一戰線和企圖衰弱與消滅共産黨,而王明是回國來執行共産國際七大所決定的統一戰線戰略, 均强調“抗日高於一切, 一切服從抗日”鼓吹“一切服從統一戰線”. 毛澤東堅持主張“獨立自主原則”, 主張建立統一軍隊, 主張統一指揮,編制,紀律 等. 中國共産黨第六屆六中全會後, 黨中央採取毛澤東的“獨立自主原則”統一戰線路線. 毛逐漸擴張黨內力量, 相對來說衰弱國際派的力量, 後來七次黨大會以後樹立了毛澤東思想, 最後共産黨在中國大陸完成了共産主義政權. Key Words : United front strategy, Mao-zedong, Wang-ming, Jiang-jieshi