http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
AGREEMENT, GUIDANCE AND PREFERENCES : THE U.S.-JAPAN SEMICONDUCTOR DISPUTE REVISITED
Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka The Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam Un 1998 人文學硏究 Vol.23 No.-
The U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Arrangement is one of the most important trade accords concluded between the two countries and is regarded as both a positive and negative model of trade negotiations. Given that one facet of the positive view is that the arrangement attained the target for market share and successfully expanded access in Japan, we need to carefully examine why the agreement could achieve the target. This study argues that although the Semiconductor Arrangement provided serious incentives to encourage the Japanese government and electronics firms to promote market access for foreign semiconductors, this was not the absolute condition. The market expansion was ahchieved as a mixed result of the arrangement with evolved corporate preferences and the Japanese government's guidance.
Material Interests and Social Norms : Regional Economic Integration in Southeast Asia
Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka 이화여자대학교 국제통상협력연구소 2005 Asian International Studies Review Vol.6 No.2
Ever since the early 1990s, the members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations(ASEAN) have deepened regional economic integration, advancing the main programs from the creation of an ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) to the formation of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC). This article identifies underpinning factors that have qualified ASEAN's such efforts for regional economic integration. In particular, it highlights the evolving perception of material interests due to external environments and socially shared norms as factors influencing ASEAN's efforts to promote economic integration. I argue that external threats deriving from moves towards stronger regionalism in other parts of the world or the rapid economic growth of the neighboring countries induced ASEAN members to strengthen their own regional economic cohesion. In addition, ASEAN's particular set of norms, such as consensus-building, flexible incrementalism, and informality, were effective in drawing willingness from members with divers differences to participate in cooperative programs. However, in the process of shifting from AFTA to the AEC, ASEAN members reconsidered some of these norms by adopting more formal implementation methods, including stronger dispute settlement mechanisms.
Hidetaka Yoshimatsu 연세대학교 동서문제연구원 2000 Global economic review Vol.29 No.2
This article explores the role of the state in industrial transformation in the era of economic globalization. It argues that economic globalization and market liberalization have not necessarily led to the retreat of state capacity in industrial development. Given the rising importance of multinational corporations (MNCs) as promoters of international transactions and domestic industrialization, even developing countries are required to show capacity to promote industrial development in cooperation with foreign MNCs. The argument is examined with the case studies of the automobile industry in Thailand and the telecommunications industry in Malaysia.
Hidetaka Yoshimatsu 서울대학교행정대학원 2010 Asian Journal of Political Science Vol.18 No.3
After the early 1990s, the wave of regionalism covered broader areas in the world, andNortheast Asia, which had weak regional cohesion largely due to history-orientedanimosity, gradually developed initiatives for regional cooperation since the late 1990s. This article seeks to address why and how China, Japan, and South Korea have pursuedregional cooperation by relying on the concept of ‘regional governance’. It advances twoarguments. First, the governments of China, Japan, and South Korea have identified theavoidance of risk from uncertainty as a major objective of promoting trilateralcooperation in specific functional areas. Second, they have gradually intensified theharmonisation of regulatory frameworks in the cooperative process in collaboration withnon-state actors. The article examines the arguments by tracing the evolution oftrilateral cooperation in environmental protection and information technology (IT)development.
Sino-Japanese Energy Relations: Processes and Constraints
Hidetaka Yoshimatsu 서울대학교행정대학원 2012 Asian Journal of Political Science Vol.20 No.2
Economic growth and a resultant rise in energy demand in China and other East Asiancountries have attracted academic interests in energy security and energy cooperation. This article examines the nuanced development of institutions to realise Sino-Japaneseenergy cooperation at the bilateral and regional levels. It highlights the objective andprocess of cooperative engagements in terms of relative gain concern and the involvementof non-state actors. The arguments that this article advances are three-fold. First, theJapanese government has pushed forwards multilateral energy cooperation in East Asiaand bilateral cooperation for energy conservation with China, which would produce botheconomic and political gains. Second, the Chinese government has adopted a cautiousapproach to Japan’s energy engagements largely because it took into account the relativepolitical gains of committing to such engagements in addition to the economic gainsproduced by them. Third, the involvement of non-state actors in cooperative projects andtheir meaningful roles in forging cross-border linkages could play a catalytic role inadvancing cooperative processes.
Global Competition and Technology Standards: Japan's Quest for Techno-Regionalism
Hidetaka Yoshimatsu 동아시아연구원 2007 Journal of East Asian Studies Vol.7 No.3
This article examines Japans evolving commitments to technology development and technology diffusion in Asia. It explores Japans technology strategies in three areas internet protocol, open source software, and horology focusing on the importance of technology standards. The development and diffusion of technology standards have become one of the core elements in establishing industrial competitiveness. The importance of technology standards encouraged the Japanese government and firms to pursue a regional policy to develop and diffuse new technological ideas and standards in Asia. Japans commitments were accepted by its neighbours because they could obtain various benefits from collaboration with Japan such as technological exchanges, technology transfer and financial aid.