http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
( Shigeo Miyagawa ) 서울대학교 아시아태평양법연구소(구 서울대학교 법학연구소) 2021 Journal of Korean Law Vol.20 No.1
Clinical legal education started in Japan together with the introduction of the law school system in 2004. This is an experiential pedagogy to “bridge theory and practice” at law schools throughout Japan. It became a prevalent teaching method to integrate knowledge in law, skills to practice law, and professional responsibility in the first stage of the law school system. As the law school system faced vexing difficulties, two important changes were made in law school system in 2020. One is the introduction of the “3+2” program in the legal education process, namely, making it possible to graduate from the undergraduate law program in three years instead of four and to finish the professional law school in two years instead of three. The other change is to make law students eligible to take the national bar examination before their law school graduation. With these two changes, the law school system entered the second stage. Clinical legal education needs to adapt to these changes. This author proposes three approaches to the “3+2” program: First is early exposure of undergraduate law students to law practice. Second is the incorporation of clinical components in fundamental law courses in the undergraduate law curriculum. And third is the intensive use of legal clinic courses in the final term of the law school curriculum after the bar examination. Legal clinics occupy an essential locus in Japanese legal education to develop lawyers to buttress the rule of law.