http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Kwong-loi (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Kwong-loi Shun,李?熙(번역자) 중국어문논역학회 2010 中國語文論譯叢刊 Vol.0 No.27
This chapter deals with various methodological issues in studying Menicus and other early Chinese thinkers. Kwong-loi Shun, first, examines carefully the relationship between the text, the Mencius and the thinker, Mencius, the problem of reference inherent in the term, Confucianism, and the meaning of “ethical.” Next, he discusses bigger issues concerning methodology. This first one is whether or not it is proper to treat early Confucianism as an object of intellectual inquiry. The second is how to avoid imposing on early Chinese certain presuppositions and frameworks alien to it. Kwong-loi Shun, while defending his own approach based on the analysis of content of thought, acknowledges the relevance of historical research and suggests the complementary relationship between them. And he attempts to resolve the second problem by the scrupulous cross-examination of early texts as well as by avoiding modern, western terms that carries too much alien connotations. Lastly Shun tells how to use commentaries and translations in analyzing the text. By comparing and adjudicating between the major alternative interpretations, he says he seek to provide some reason for accepting a proposed interpretation, rather than merely presenting it as his own preferred interpretation. In so doing, he hopes to put forward considerations in its favor to which those who disagree can respond, thereby providing the starting point of a dialogue to resolve such disagreements.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
